Results 1 to 40 of 60
-
10-08-2018, 06:02 PM #1
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 78
i hate to ask, but..
I really hate to see the threads where people are asking what kind of cycle they can run based on what they have on hand yet here I am kinda asking....
I'm 52, 5'9" with 9% bf at around 190 lbs
im looking to run a lean bulk cycle starting in November then take a ten week break or so and then lean out a little before summer.
I was planning on running Test, EQ and possibly Mast cycle, but I do have some Tren on hand and I would mind running that a lower dosage for possibly only 8 weeks or so to avoid to many side effects. I have run Tren several times I the past with minimal side effects.
Does anyone have stacks that they run with these compounds???
thanks in advance
-
10-08-2018, 06:06 PM #2
Hey. Glad you asked and didn’t just throw something together.
How many cycles have you run?
What’s your training experience?
What type of test do you have?
Is the tren e or a?
-
10-08-2018, 06:08 PM #3
-
10-08-2018, 06:24 PM #4
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 78
Thanks for the reply guys.
I have run several cycles in the past 8 years and have worked out my entire adult life.
The Tren I have on hand is Tren A and I have about 2500 mg
I also have 10,000 mg of Test C, 7500 mg of EQ and 6000 mg Mast
im not in a huge hurry to start the cycle so I have time to add to what I currently have.
-
10-08-2018, 06:34 PM #5
-
10-08-2018, 06:43 PM #6
-
10-08-2018, 06:46 PM #7
Aw fuck I just saw the tren amount.
Yup cape got this
-
10-08-2018, 06:47 PM #8
Or... Load it all into one vial and pin 3ml per day...
Its called "pot luck"
-
10-08-2018, 06:48 PM #9
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
Being your wanting to run a 'lean bulk' , and not blow up with lots of size and water (which is great for a traditionally bulk) then you'll want to use your EQ as a 'filler' . also that way you won't have to run much or any AI at all.
so a traditional bulk you'd probably run 750-1000mg of test as a base . WELL with a lean bulk, we are going to get that 1000mg base by using EQ instead. . just think of EQ as test, but its your low estrogenic clean test.
so instead of 1000mg of test , we do
300mg of test
700mg of EQ
this is your new 1 gram base
Then we have the Masteron and Tren , which go awesome together. the Masteron and Tren will add your 'androgenic ' base , which you'll need with Test being on the lower end. The Masteon will also work as an 'ancillary' to the cycle as a whole as well as to the Tren, as it blunts both prolactin and estrogen receptors. AND, the masteron will work to lower SHBG which will in turn free up more Testosterone (another reason we don't need a high dose of test in this cycle plan)
so looks like
weeks 1-12 - Test 300mg
weeks 1-12 - EQ 700mg
weeks 6-12 - Tren 400mg
weeks 6-12 - Masteon 500mg
pretty basic . IF you were after more size and not looking for a more dry lean bulk, I'd be running a lot higher dosage of test to get some estrogenic effects with the elevated androgens . but raw size doesn't appear to be your goal.
-
10-08-2018, 06:54 PM #10
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
I know of a guy that had his clients do this.. he would have them get 100ml vials and mix their own 'blends' for daily injections for 30 day period. he'd have them label them things like 'androgenic mix #1" , 'anabolic mix #2' ..
I wonder how well things actually mix though and how much of each compound you're getting in each 3ml draw daily . after the 30 days though, you obviously got it all in
-
10-08-2018, 06:58 PM #11
-
10-08-2018, 07:35 PM #12
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 78
Great advice guys, I think ill add a little Tren to my supply and finish off my cycle with a lower dose of tren and Mast.
I did forget to mention that I'm on TRT and run abbot 150mg of test C weekly.
-
10-08-2018, 07:37 PM #13
-
10-08-2018, 08:11 PM #14
Yes mood changed.
You can literally rock out with you cock and/or Glock out!
-
10-08-2018, 08:12 PM #15
-
10-08-2018, 08:16 PM #16
-
10-08-2018, 08:40 PM #17
Staff ~ HRT Optimization Specialist
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Arctic Circle
- Posts
- 4,286
Is your TRT done as 75mg twice per week or all in 1 shot ? Also do you have HCG as part of your TRT?
You may also be a candidate for HGH - something to consider / look in to.
Also since you said you handle Tren well, if it was me I would sell the EQ and buy more Tren or Nandrolone for the future.I no longer check my inbox. If you PM me I will not reply.
-
10-08-2018, 08:58 PM #18
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
I'm honestly curious why ? how do you know he doesn't also handle EQ quite well ? EQ and 19 nors are complete opposites . basically selling quality oranges to buy apples instead (just wonder why not both ?)
If you like Test, but you don't like to 'aromatize' a ton so you keep your test dosages on the lower end .. EQ is nothing more then Test that doesn't Aromatize much. that trait makes it a very universally useful compound imo.
and on side note -- wither anyone reading this is a fan of Dave Palumbo or not, he just recently stated last week that if he was to get back on a cycle he would ONLY run TRT dose test and EQ... (I've been promoting using EQ as a 'filler' drug with low TRT doses of test since I joined this board . . . pretty sure it was 'muscle science' was one of the first guys to hear about doing that and gave it a try and liked it).
I think a lot of guys may dismiss EQ. and they never once even tried it , or never ran it properly perhaps
-
10-08-2018, 09:02 PM #19
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
and for those that are not aware .. EQ was developed by taking Dianabol and making it into an injectable (chemically on paper they are the exact same drug minus the 17 alkalation).
NO injectable Dbol is not EQ lol . injectable Dbol is pure Dbol, 17 alkalated and all in an injectible solution .. EQ is Dbol chemically altered to remove the 17 alkalation (which results in EQ not being very estrogenic).. and Dbol was originally made to be a type of oral test . when EQ came about shortly after, they realized the EQ was basically a non estrogenic form of test to a certain degreeLast edited by GearHeaded; 10-08-2018 at 09:07 PM.
-
10-08-2018, 09:04 PM #20
-
10-08-2018, 09:06 PM #21
-
10-08-2018, 09:07 PM #22
-
10-08-2018, 09:08 PM #23
-
10-08-2018, 09:15 PM #24
Banned- for my own actions
- Join Date
- Feb 2014
- Posts
- 1,957
-
10-08-2018, 09:16 PM #25
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
from my impression of the way you run gear Obs, you may be better suited running Boldenone Ace (which is just fast acting EQ).. better suited for guys that really blast imo
-
10-08-2018, 09:17 PM #26
-
10-08-2018, 09:20 PM #27
I did not know there was short acting boldenone ...
Damn.
When I write something off I pay no attention and miss important shit
-
10-08-2018, 09:29 PM #28
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
people are realizing the benefits of using shorter esters and this stuff is becoming more available..
in regards to primo tabs --
I've always said that oral steroids are generally stronger and have more 'punch' to them then their equal counterpart in injectible form (Dbol tabs are way stronger then injectable Dbol for eg.).
however, Primo is the ONE exception . I would go with injectable Primobolan Ace over the primo oral tabs (the inject is 50mg/ml though).
I don't think primo is very strong orally because it is not 17 alkalated (which means its not too bad for your liver, but mg per mg it doesn't absorb well and is considered 'weak'). I've never ran oral primo though, just depot and ace.
-
10-09-2018, 05:48 AM #29
Staff ~ HRT Optimization Specialist
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Arctic Circle
- Posts
- 4,286
I did say "If it was me..."
Not many people handle Tren well and it's a lot stronger of a compound and in my opinion better for bulking than EQ with 5x the Anabolic Rating. As an analogy, Steak is a better protein source than boneless/skinless Chicken, but not everyone can afford steak, so for those that can, they have reason to be more inclined to choose the better option.
I would rather keep Test low, not have to run an AI, and only worry about managing prolactin with a 19nor (200 Test+Masteron allows for this).
Also, EQ only lasted a decade before being discontinued for human use and being transitioned equestrian applications. I've seen hundreds of horses on EQ and I've seen people in the gym, in the community, and on the board - the differences are a complete joke which is why I don't feel it to be an effective steroid use for humans.
EQ Dosing for horses is 0.13-0.50mg/lb - One of the largest breeds of horses is a Percheron which has an average weight of 1900 lbs. That means a horse, at 8x the weight of a 250 lb monster gym rat is only going to be taking 700mg of EQ per 10-14 days and put , and likely gain 75-100lbs. Most people are advised to take 800-1g of EQ, aka more than an animal which exponentially more muscle mass. Yes, I understand people are not like horses but the goals are the same and the example still applies.
That is why I don't think EQ has a place in bodybuilding, again, which is why I stated "If it was me..."I no longer check my inbox. If you PM me I will not reply.
-
10-09-2018, 06:28 AM #30
I myself have had zero results with EQ. But I have a friend that was 220ish lbs 8 yrs ago. He is 280 now and he swears by EQ. Maybe some people respond better to it than others. I don’t know. I do know there’s usually no in between with EQ. You love it or you hate it.
-
10-09-2018, 06:46 AM #31
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 78
I do the TRT shots at 75mg twice per week. I was running HGH for about a year but I stopped in June. I was doing two injections daily totaling 3 IU. at the time I didn't think I was getting much gain from it but looking back now I think I should probably pick that back up.
currently I'm not running HCG, I have in the past but I have to keep my dosages pretty low. I take 15 mg Mobic daily for inflammation and oddly enough the HCG causes me to have some side effects from the Mobic.
-
10-09-2018, 07:10 AM #32
Staff ~ HRT Optimization Specialist
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Arctic Circle
- Posts
- 4,286
-
10-09-2018, 07:57 AM #33
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2012
- Posts
- 78
-
10-09-2018, 11:29 AM #34
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
things on paper do not always equate to real life. is tren 5x more anabolic then EQ, sure. but Halotestin is like 19x more anabolic then Test and 5x more anabolic then Tren .. yet anyone who has used Halo knows, it sucks for bulking. its a way better cutter.
ever ran Tren by itself or with a very low dose of just Test ? Plenty of guys have. They expect to blow up on tren, and after a few weeks they find they are actually losing weight. its not a stand alone bulker at all. its high androgenic rating with zero ability to convert to estrogen keeps it from being able to add on a lot of size (unless properly stacked).
as much as I like Tren . From my own practical experience and what I've seen with other guys, I cannot confidently say that Tren is a bulker and EQ is not. its very context dependent . like I said, run Tren solo and when you start losing weight you may re-consider your opinion on Tren being a bulker.
having said that.. combine Tren with a shit ton of estrogen (example, 500 tren with 50mg of Dbol per day, and 1000mg of test per week with NO AI) and thats when the magic happens and Tren becomes a very good bulking agent. reason why Tren is not given to bulk up cattle WITHOUT ESTROGEN being injected as well.
but as for EQ - its not even in this conversation . its an entirely different compound for entirely different goals and reasons. like I say. apples and oranges here.
and just a side note-- I never knew EQ was used to try and put 100 pounds of mass on a race horse. seems counter productive to me.
always heard of EQ being used to raise the horses aerobic capacity , increase recovery, performance, and even joint health with collagen synthesis and synovial fluid retention.
adding 100 pounds to a race horse in 10 days would just slow that horse down big time.
but hey. I don't know shit about horsesLast edited by GearHeaded; 10-09-2018 at 11:35 AM.
-
10-09-2018, 11:43 AM #35
Staff ~ HRT Optimization Specialist
- Join Date
- Mar 2011
- Location
- Arctic Circle
- Posts
- 4,286
Percherons aren't race horses they are work horses. Saying equipoise is for only race horses is like saying Monkeys only eat bananas.
I no longer check my inbox. If you PM me I will not reply.
-
10-09-2018, 11:48 AM #36
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
thats a pretty bold statement
so an IFBB pro (I won't name publicly but you all are familiar) who has been in the game for 25 years, done over 60 shows, placed in the Arnold.. when he says he never ran Tren to get to where he got to (but did run plenty of test, eq, gh, and diuretics) . we should dismiss that being EQ has no place in bodybuilding.
or when top level 'gurus' have EQ in Olympia comepetitors off season and on season cycles , we should dismiss that.
or when guys who have been over 300 pounds and jacked and competed at a high level , like Dave Palumbo, and who have coached pros for years, say that EQ is his favorite anabolic ,. we should dismiss that cause EQ really has no place in bodybuilding .
seems like a ludacris statement to say that one of the most popular bodybuilding drugs for decades and decades has no place in bodybuilding, when in fact that is the EXACT place the drug is primarily used !!Last edited by GearHeaded; 10-09-2018 at 11:55 AM.
-
10-09-2018, 11:48 AM #37
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
-
10-09-2018, 11:58 AM #38
My horse eats anabolic hay.
-
10-09-2018, 12:04 PM #39
BANNED
- Join Date
- Nov 2017
- Location
- Bragging to someone
- Posts
- 8,550
so by your math, a 1900 pound horse can put on about 4% his body weight in mass by taking EQ (which to you seems like a big deal and that EQ is great for mass for horses but not humans).. but a man can't put on 4% his body weight in mass by taking EQ.
how much do you weigh ? lets just say 180 pounds .. so you don't think EQ can help you put on only 7 pounds (ie, thats 4% just like the horse)
1900 pound horse takes eq and gains 75 pounds like you said ,,, thats 4% mass increase
180 pound man takes eq and gains 7 pounds ... thats a 4% mass increase
hmm.. seems very reasonable to me. so not sure why you say horses respond to EQ but humans don'tLast edited by GearHeaded; 10-09-2018 at 12:15 PM.
-
10-09-2018, 12:05 PM #40
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
So far so good, they seem to be doing what they’re supposed to.
Expired dbol (blue hearts)