-
09-24-2010, 10:45 AM #1
-
09-24-2010, 12:29 PM #2
what are your plans with the nolvadex (are u going to run labs to see where your estro is soon?) i dont see many ppl using nolva on trt let alone both...have u read up on either?
-
09-24-2010, 12:50 PM #3
I had an estrogen panel ran. I don't have the results in front of me. I'm gonna have to pick them up on Monday. I go back in for blood work on the 14th. I didn't know much about either when I got the Rx. I thought Nolva was an A.I. But now after some research I realize that it is a blocker. I think I need arimidex instead of the nolva. Guess I'll have to talk with the Dr. and see what he thinks.
-
09-27-2010, 03:32 PM #4
I got my Estradiol lab back and it is 44 on a range of 0-56.
-
09-27-2010, 07:29 PM #5Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2010
- Location
- Central Oklahoma
- Posts
- 131
-
09-27-2010, 08:44 PM #6
Thank you. I have found this out the hard way and am having troubles getting my GP to give me an A.I. I know he will once my next labs are run but that's not till the 8th.
-
09-27-2010, 10:53 PM #7Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Californication
- Posts
- 5,656
I would dump the Nolva unless you're dealing specifically with gyno related issues. Nolva is a SERM, not a AI.
In the big picture of things, your E2 score isn't all that bad at 44. Depending on your TRT regiment, you could add 0.25mg or 0.50mg x 2/wk of Adex/Liquidex and get that in the low 30's in no time. You can easily get the Liquidex from our sponsor, ARR.
-
09-27-2010, 11:26 PM #8
Thanks. I am starting to get a better grasp of what is going on with everything. I guess it's all just going to take time. I'd drop the Nolva if I had an A.I. But until I get one I'm gonna stick with it. Hopefully today will be a new day and the doc will write the Rx for the Arimidex .
I see that you said 44 wasn't that bad for an E2 score, but it is still in the upper 1/3???
-
09-28-2010, 12:02 AM #9Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Californication
- Posts
- 5,656
If you get it down to 35, it would still be in the upper 1/3 range depending on who's reference chart you're looking at. I see these E2 ranges that show 0-52, or similar. Trust me, you would rather be 52 than 0. E2 is very good hormone to have, just not abundance levels of it. 30 is about perfect in my book +/- 5 points. 52 is manageable by all means. Ask members like Forrest & Trees what high levels of E2 really are. I think he was around 100 points higher than yours, and trusted a moderate dose of AI to bring it down to normal levels. It took 2 or 3 months, but that's the pace it should go to allow the body to adjust and get acclimated properly.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS