Ok guys so I'm debating about taking IGF lr3 at 40mcg ED for 50 days, does anyone have any experience with using this at a young age?
Ok guys so I'm debating about taking IGF lr3 at 40mcg ED for 50 days, does anyone have any experience with using this at a young age?
wait. Im 26, and I started with Gh at 25 I think that is a little premature. This is beyond pushing it IMO. The odds of your plates being open is pretty significant. Don't risk it.
the youngest that i've heard of guys starting is when they're 20 and they're fine so far.
I am not an expert, but I think it is a good idea...the best drug you could take at your age.
I am 19, and you said you were 18. At these ages are muscle cells are more impressionable than those of an older person. Meaning that there is a greater chance for Hyperplasia.
Again, i am not an expert on this stuff, but I think it makes sense.
So far...you are talking about introducing a basically new drug (i.e. long term effects are unknown because the data is not out there) at the youngest age of anyone who has ever tried it...that about right?
well my reasoning for wanting to take it is because woulnd't it be better then taking aas like tren and deca at my age when they can really fvck up my testicular axis and what not, what bad sides from IGF lr3 are experienced long term?
i wouldnt risk it man. like Kingof516 said... its so new you dont know the longterm effects on someone your age who is still growing. i'm 23 and i just started using it a few weeks ago.
with such a short half life and a short cycle with a long break afterwards would there really be any need to fear long term side efects though?
honestly i have no background info on why you should really not use it. all i know is its potent and effective when used correctly. i'm only 5 yrs older than you and im getting sick results so who knows!Originally Posted by BlInDsIdE
your best bet would be to ask JohnnyB or Rodge. they've tought me a lot about the stuff.
thanks fight
i think that is a little bit too young as well. wait until your plates are closed but if your intent on running anything then nothing we say is going to stop you. I would train with Anavar instead, i am pretty sure it doesnt close the growth plates (you should double check that I may have misinterpreted)
IGF just seems like it would be the better way to go as opposed to aas that could fvck up my natural test levels 4ever, my last cycle i got shut down really really hard and i'm still going through my PCT. it just kinda made me think
I mean which would be better, going on test e tren e and eq for 14 wks in 6 months or just going with the IGF
What makes you think lr3igf-1 won't do anything to your axis. Wouldn't it screw up your GH axis?
Especially right now, it's not even developed maturely.
I'm done growing....i've used aas and worst of all "clomid"
Off topic, but does clomid close your growth plates? Thats how I interpreted that line (I may have been wrong).Originally Posted by BlInDsIdE
yes its been provenOriginally Posted by TheNextBigThing
Yes it would, since it's a SERM, so is nolva. It acts like estrogen on bone.Originally Posted by TheNextBigThing
anyone else have any input?
Also, about the question, I am only a little bit older than you and I will most likely be taking it in the near future. Although, my body is more matured than most people my age.
as is mineOriginally Posted by TheNextBigThing
OK so assuming my growth plates are already closed since they are, why else would i not want to use IGF, would it hinder my bodies ability to produce its own free IGF-1?
I say take advantage of your hormones now and eat and train like a mad man, you'll see great gains
JohnnyB
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)