Thread: 18 yr old on IGF lr3
-
08-16-2005, 01:39 PM #1
18 yr old on IGF lr3
Ok guys so I'm debating about taking IGF lr3 at 40mcg ED for 50 days, does anyone have any experience with using this at a young age?
-
08-16-2005, 01:40 PM #2
wait. Im 26, and I started with Gh at 25 I think that is a little premature. This is beyond pushing it IMO. The odds of your plates being open is pretty significant. Don't risk it.
-
08-16-2005, 01:46 PM #3
the youngest that i've heard of guys starting is when they're 20 and they're fine so far.
-
08-16-2005, 01:47 PM #4
I am not an expert, but I think it is a good idea...the best drug you could take at your age.
I am 19, and you said you were 18. At these ages are muscle cells are more impressionable than those of an older person. Meaning that there is a greater chance for Hyperplasia.
Again, i am not an expert on this stuff, but I think it makes sense.
-
08-16-2005, 01:48 PM #5
So far...you are talking about introducing a basically new drug (i.e. long term effects are unknown because the data is not out there) at the youngest age of anyone who has ever tried it...that about right?
-
08-16-2005, 01:50 PM #6
-
08-16-2005, 01:52 PM #7
i wouldnt risk it man. like Kingof516 said... its so new you dont know the longterm effects on someone your age who is still growing. i'm 23 and i just started using it a few weeks ago.
-
08-16-2005, 01:55 PM #8
with such a short half life and a short cycle with a long break afterwards would there really be any need to fear long term side efects though?
-
08-16-2005, 02:11 PM #9Originally Posted by BlInDsIdE
your best bet would be to ask JohnnyB or Rodge. they've tought me a lot about the stuff.
-
08-16-2005, 02:30 PM #10
thanks fight
-
08-16-2005, 03:33 PM #11
i think that is a little bit too young as well. wait until your plates are closed but if your intent on running anything then nothing we say is going to stop you. I would train with Anavar instead, i am pretty sure it doesnt close the growth plates (you should double check that I may have misinterpreted)
-
08-16-2005, 03:35 PM #12
IGF just seems like it would be the better way to go as opposed to aas that could fvck up my natural test levels 4ever, my last cycle i got shut down really really hard and i'm still going through my PCT. it just kinda made me think
-
08-16-2005, 04:16 PM #13
I mean which would be better, going on test e tren e and eq for 14 wks in 6 months or just going with the IGF
-
08-16-2005, 04:57 PM #14Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 275
What makes you think lr3igf-1 won't do anything to your axis. Wouldn't it screw up your GH axis?
Especially right now, it's not even developed maturely.
-
08-16-2005, 05:00 PM #15
I'm done growing....i've used aas and worst of all "clomid"
-
08-16-2005, 06:55 PM #16
anyone else have any input?
-
08-16-2005, 09:25 PM #17Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 379
Originally Posted by BlInDsIdE
-
08-16-2005, 09:27 PM #18Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 379
Also, about the question, I am only a little bit older than you and I will most likely be taking it in the near future. Although, my body is more matured than most people my age.
-
08-16-2005, 10:05 PM #19Originally Posted by TheNextBigThing
-
08-16-2005, 10:06 PM #20Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2005
- Posts
- 275
Originally Posted by TheNextBigThing
-
08-16-2005, 10:06 PM #21Originally Posted by TheNextBigThing
-
08-16-2005, 10:11 PM #22
OK so assuming my growth plates are already closed since they are, why else would i not want to use IGF, would it hinder my bodies ability to produce its own free IGF-1?
-
08-16-2005, 10:14 PM #23
I say take advantage of your hormones now and eat and train like a mad man, you'll see great gains
JohnnyB
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS