-
11-23-2005, 11:53 AM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 40
Is 25 years old too young for HGH?
Is 25 years old too young for HGH? If so, why?
-
11-23-2005, 11:57 AM #2
I dont know a lot about this subject but I'm inclined to say yes. But I dont know your stats or lifting experience so you should say what the others say
-
11-23-2005, 11:57 AM #3
Before I get into a lengthy post,let me ask you a question.
Are you a high level athlete?By that I mean are you pursuing some sport as a career?
~Pinnacle~
-
11-23-2005, 12:05 PM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2005
- Location
- New York
- Posts
- 40
no I'm not a high level athlete, I'm just looking to make some gains and burn some fat that will be more permanent than those that I have seen through my use of AAS. I have been working out now for about six years and juicing for about 4 and I am considering this because I want to see more permanent results.
-
11-23-2005, 12:19 PM #5Originally Posted by marshall law
As for burning fat,there are much cheaper alternatives than HGH.
Lastly,HGH needs to be ran at least 3 mos to see results.6 months or more is the suggested cycle.And at your age in order to really see results off HGH you'd need to run at least 4-5 iu's ED.And the results you'd see off that dose would be an expensive fat burner,nothing more,but it will help to retain mass while you're off cycle.
~Pinnacle~
-
11-23-2005, 01:04 PM #6
I was going to use HGH at the age of 22, but i read that its not any idea until your in your 30:s or you are going to go pro.
-
11-23-2005, 03:11 PM #7
I'm 24, ran GH at 4iu for 7 months. Pinnacle hit every point clearly. Not worth it at all. I think I'll wait another 5-10yrs before I do it again.
BD
-
11-23-2005, 04:07 PM #8Originally Posted by IBdmfkr
Thanks,
-
11-23-2005, 05:17 PM #9Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 139
Im 27 and it wasent worth the money no and why its not worth it? because i ran jin 4ius ed for 5months and if i compare the price with the gains i got was it worth it hell no ,Lr3 IGF-1 is better for mass gaines and why does gh work better on older guys because your hormon production gh,Test starts to decline at the age of 25 so thats logical then that a 35 year old will get better effect because he´s gotr lower levels
-
11-23-2005, 08:13 PM #10Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 247
for you guys sayin it wasn't worth it...
its not worth it for mass, but would you agree that you probably lost a lot of fat on GH?
-
11-23-2005, 08:16 PM #11Originally Posted by alwayson
I lost a decent amount of fat but can think of many many other ways of losing some BF then spending that kind of money of GH. First choice would be a proper diet and cardio regimen then take it from there. Too many people turn to "help" and dont even have the basics under control
-
11-23-2005, 11:45 PM #12
Agreed, I would not do it again. The gains are so small that it is almost unnoticable. Just my opinion.
-
11-24-2005, 01:50 AM #13Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2005
- Posts
- 139
I think that are you 35+ then gh could be something if you run it 6-12months 4-5ius/ed with aas/slin and now you can get cheap generic Gh that works just as good as jintropin so i were to run another gh cycle i would probably run some generic gh
-
11-24-2005, 10:28 PM #14Associate Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Posts
- 247
how about GH for keeping more gains after cycle?
does it work in that respect or not?
(i refuse to use igf)
-
11-24-2005, 10:31 PM #15Originally Posted by alwayson
~Pinnacle~
-
11-24-2005, 10:31 PM #16
I thought it did a good job, but not worth the money. I've experienced similar results with clen . GH and clen are both known for retaining muscle after a cycle.
-
11-24-2005, 10:38 PM #17supersteve Guest
I found it kept the sides from tren away pretty well. I didn't get night sweats once while I was on. Insomnia was kept at bay for a long time, and acne was a non-issue.
Also it kept me lean while eating way over my maintenance calories.
It isn't ridiculously expensive if you've got a good source (don't pm me lol), but you can get 500iu of generic gh for ~$800. If you homebrew your AAS, it doesn't work out being that bad all up.
-
11-24-2005, 10:50 PM #18
I'm a month into my GH cycle of 5iu's/day, and I feel as if it's just starting to kick. I'm running it w/ 1250mg test/wk for 8 wks, and 40-50mg dbol /day for 6 wks, I will begin my insulin use within the next couple weeks. So far I'm liking GH, its giving me a pretty full and pumped look and I'm nowhere near as bloated as I should be running all this test and dbol. I think when I drop this dbol I'll be able to see my abs again. I'm going to run GH for 6 months, I'll give it a fair chance. However I wont do it w/out slin and a shitload of test. W/out slin I've heard the shit is almost useless.
-
11-24-2005, 10:52 PM #19
BTW, I'm also 25 myself. The only downside to this stuff for me is the fatigue on it. I'm tired as hell all the time. I'll sleep 10 hrs, wake up and eat, then go right back to bed for 2 hrs sometimes. It's constant fatigue, so maybe that means I'm growing?
-
11-24-2005, 11:32 PM #20Originally Posted by stayinstacked
-
11-27-2005, 08:34 AM #21
what are the sides of using this slin wrong or something happening playing with insulin
-
11-27-2005, 11:03 AM #22
You die an excrutiating death.
-
11-27-2005, 11:11 AM #23Originally Posted by doghunter
That's definitely not the best word to use in the same sentence with Slin. "Playing" with slin can be playing with your life. As IB already stated
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
Today, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS