Thread: 191 aa vs 192aa HGH
-
05-03-2006, 11:26 PM #1
191 aa vs 192aa HGH
Im sure this has been posted many times, but I am having trouble finding much about this. Is there and consensus about which form of hgh is better, 191 or 192aa? Do they both work about the same? Saw where some were saying the 192aa can cause welts at injection site, but havent seen much else.
-
05-03-2006, 11:36 PM #2
Most will use HGH that has a 191aa sequence, because the 192aa HGH causes antibody build up as well as red welts at injection site.
-GearLast edited by Gear; 05-03-2006 at 11:40 PM.
-
05-03-2006, 11:40 PM #3Originally Posted by Gear
-
05-04-2006, 01:36 AM #4
If I was to inclcude HGH in my cycle, I would run it for at least 6 months.
-Gear
-
05-04-2006, 10:34 AM #5Originally Posted by Maldorf
-
05-04-2006, 11:14 AM #6Originally Posted by Maldorf
-
05-04-2006, 11:22 AM #7Originally Posted by Jayhova
-
05-07-2006, 05:19 AM #8
ive used them both many, many times and i think kexing and gensci are the same. ive always had the same results and sides from the both of them. im well aware of the difference on paper and i was hesitant to try the 192aa myself but once i did i was just as satisfied as i was from the 191.
-
05-07-2006, 08:16 PM #9Originally Posted by RedBaron
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Filtered draw syringe
Today, 10:16 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS