Results 1 to 14 of 14
Thread: IGF, MGF research or lack of
-
01-20-2007, 08:58 AM #1
IGF, MGF research or lack of
How many of you guys are concerned about the fact there is no research about IGF MGF long term effects?
I was reading a post about the possibilty for IGF to cause more cancer cells to be produced...
-
01-20-2007, 09:06 AM #2
it makes perfect sense if you already have cancer I could see it growing the cells. always get a cancer screen b4 using igf LMAO are those available
-
01-20-2007, 09:29 AM #3
their is a risk of something with just about everything that is discussed on this forum bro...
just gotta be smart and not abuse anything...everything in moderation
-
01-20-2007, 09:53 AM #4
Im aware of these risks... I was just reading other posts and was curious what everyones thoughts were on the topic
-
01-22-2007, 03:04 PM #5Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jan 2007
- Posts
- 138
the same thing is said about GH and AAS
-
01-22-2007, 05:28 PM #6New Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2006
- Location
- Massachusetts
- Posts
- 30
I agree, the thought of new advancements makes me want to try them out but with such little research... well, I think I'll hold off for a little bit.
-
01-22-2007, 08:08 PM #7Originally Posted by sundancekid
-
01-22-2007, 08:09 PM #8Originally Posted by Bigjroach
-
01-22-2007, 09:04 PM #9
The MGF still needs to be used from legitimate labs in kits instead of generic versions of it in one vial. Generic IGF does not compare to the kits of IGF from China according to two good bros of mine that are mods at a few forums. I would wait until MGF is produced in kits...which I actually hear is going to be pretty soon...same labs that make Getropin I believe.
-
01-22-2007, 09:07 PM #10
As far as the cancer goes, anything that can make cells bigger, get bigger faster, or make more cells of can pose a problem. Why do you think diets high in sugar can lead to cancer? Because the onslaught of insulin over years and years can cause certain cells to mutate and not die off like in a natural life-cycle of healthy cells.
I would say that AAS, IGF, MGF, GH and even some research chemicals can increase one's chance of having cancer if you are already prone to it. The key is to be as healthy as possible with everything else. You can't be doing a gram of test, 20 iu/wk of GH, slin, and snortin' coke on the weekends for years on end. Everyone has a vice, but you should still know that moderation is key.
-
01-22-2007, 09:10 PM #11
Has any one had any good or bad results to comment on? I think this would clear up alot of confusion.
-
01-23-2007, 11:01 PM #12Originally Posted by jdavis2007
-
01-23-2007, 11:06 PM #13Originally Posted by jdavis2007
Originally Posted by jdavis2007
-
01-24-2007, 08:02 AM #14
http://endo.endojournals.org/cgi/con...ull/144/6/2319
read this, it links growth of prostate cancer to IGF-1 levels. the study reduced igf-1 levels by binding them. they where able to reuce the levels w/ low fat diets and excersice showing thatg once the IGF-1 was reduced the size decreased.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Cytomel dosage ?
05-15-2024, 09:31 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS