Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    donberry427's Avatar
    donberry427 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bodymore
    Posts
    380

    IGF, MGF research or lack of

    How many of you guys are concerned about the fact there is no research about IGF MGF long term effects?

    I was reading a post about the possibilty for IGF to cause more cancer cells to be produced...

  2. #2
    BITTAPART2's Avatar
    BITTAPART2 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    anywhere my son lives
    Posts
    1,745
    it makes perfect sense if you already have cancer I could see it growing the cells. always get a cancer screen b4 using igf LMAO are those available

  3. #3
    plzr8's Avatar
    plzr8 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Posts
    1,352
    their is a risk of something with just about everything that is discussed on this forum bro...

    just gotta be smart and not abuse anything...everything in moderation

  4. #4
    donberry427's Avatar
    donberry427 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bodymore
    Posts
    380
    Im aware of these risks... I was just reading other posts and was curious what everyones thoughts were on the topic

  5. #5
    sundancekid is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    138
    the same thing is said about GH and AAS

  6. #6
    Bigjroach is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    30
    I agree, the thought of new advancements makes me want to try them out but with such little research... well, I think I'll hold off for a little bit.

  7. #7
    donberry427's Avatar
    donberry427 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bodymore
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by sundancekid
    the same thing is said about GH and AAS
    Duh about GH ..........but AAS has been around for sometime and theres plenty of research about it...

  8. #8
    donberry427's Avatar
    donberry427 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bodymore
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by Bigjroach
    I agree, the thought of new advancements makes me want to try them out but with such little research... well, I think I'll hold off for a little bit.
    Thats how I feel...plus people arent getting great results with MGF like I thought they would...

  9. #9
    jdavis2007's Avatar
    jdavis2007 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    www.tylergrip.com
    Posts
    321
    The MGF still needs to be used from legitimate labs in kits instead of generic versions of it in one vial. Generic IGF does not compare to the kits of IGF from China according to two good bros of mine that are mods at a few forums. I would wait until MGF is produced in kits...which I actually hear is going to be pretty soon...same labs that make Getropin I believe.

  10. #10
    jdavis2007's Avatar
    jdavis2007 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    www.tylergrip.com
    Posts
    321
    As far as the cancer goes, anything that can make cells bigger, get bigger faster, or make more cells of can pose a problem. Why do you think diets high in sugar can lead to cancer? Because the onslaught of insulin over years and years can cause certain cells to mutate and not die off like in a natural life-cycle of healthy cells.

    I would say that AAS, IGF, MGF, GH and even some research chemicals can increase one's chance of having cancer if you are already prone to it. The key is to be as healthy as possible with everything else. You can't be doing a gram of test, 20 iu/wk of GH, slin, and snortin' coke on the weekends for years on end. Everyone has a vice, but you should still know that moderation is key.

  11. #11
    monkeyboy1215's Avatar
    monkeyboy1215 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    A galaxy far far way!
    Posts
    133
    Has any one had any good or bad results to comment on? I think this would clear up alot of confusion.

  12. #12
    donberry427's Avatar
    donberry427 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bodymore
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by jdavis2007
    The MGF still needs to be used from legitimate labs in kits instead of generic versions of it in one vial. Generic IGF does not compare to the kits of IGF from China according to two good bros of mine that are mods at a few forums. I would wait until MGF is produced in kits...which I actually hear is going to be pretty soon...same labs that make Getropin I believe.
    I will def be watching out for this.

  13. #13
    donberry427's Avatar
    donberry427 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Bodymore
    Posts
    380
    Quote Originally Posted by jdavis2007
    As far as the cancer goes, anything that can make cells bigger, get bigger faster, or make more cells of can pose a problem. Why do you think diets high in sugar can lead to cancer? Because the onslaught of insulin over years and years can cause certain cells to mutate and not die off like in a natural life-cycle of healthy cells.
    True.

    Quote Originally Posted by jdavis2007
    I would say that AAS, IGF, MGF, GH and even some research chemicals can increase one's chance of having cancer if you are already prone to it. The key is to be as healthy as possible with everything else. You can't be doing a gram of test, 20 iu/wk of GH, slin, and snortin' coke on the weekends for years on end. Everyone has a vice, but you should still know that moderation is key.
    LMFAO ..........but true

  14. #14
    BITTAPART2's Avatar
    BITTAPART2 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    anywhere my son lives
    Posts
    1,745
    http://endo.endojournals.org/cgi/con...ull/144/6/2319

    read this, it links growth of prostate cancer to IGF-1 levels. the study reduced igf-1 levels by binding them. they where able to reuce the levels w/ low fat diets and excersice showing thatg once the IGF-1 was reduced the size decreased.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •