Results 41 to 49 of 49
-
06-27-2007, 11:14 PM #41
Sorry that last part was kinda funny.
-B D
DO NOT ASK FOR A SOURCE, NONE SHALL BE GIVEN.
If asking cycle advice Post up Stats/previous cycle experience/goals!
If asking diet advice Post Stats/current diet/goals!
“Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same.”
I B D
AR VET
-
06-28-2007, 12:18 AM #42Associate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Location
- USA
- Posts
- 379
Originally Posted by ss01
-
06-28-2007, 12:26 AM #43Originally Posted by I**mfkr
Well I have read quite a lot on this subject. The point is someone has a tumour and they are considering taking a compound which SOME would say in theory could make his situation worse. Wether it is proven in science or not I am not comfortable with reccomending something which even has a slight chance of causing someone cancer and killing them.
It does not sound like you have a very high opinion of anyone here on this board so i would suggest you go hang out with all the clever people elsewhere and leave us stupid bros to speculate.
-
06-28-2007, 07:56 AM #44Associate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Location
- Montreal, Canada
- Posts
- 204
What EVER
-
06-28-2007, 08:51 AM #45
Agreed PB, plus most ppl aren't even close to the level of needing to use GH to break past any genetic limits in gains or fatloss.
Money could be spent in such better places.
-
06-28-2007, 08:57 AM #46Banned
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- England...
- Posts
- 2,832
Originally Posted by I**mfkr
So true,90% of the people using HGH on this site should not be,they should spend money on amino acids!!! They think they can gain LBM with HGH,LOL.
-
06-28-2007, 01:01 PM #47Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2006
- Location
- Massilia
- Posts
- 329
ans i also read that aas have not be used with a tumor .
I'm reading some french studies about non cancer tumors and hgh , i will try to find something interesting for you.
-
07-10-2007, 06:21 PM #48
I say do it, **** it. Youre going to anyway, no matter how many people on here say "NO BAD IDEA".
-
07-10-2007, 08:33 PM #49
Like many here said, GH wont really produce much muscular growth, especially if you do low doses. Taking this risk with HGH is just not worth it, the rewards are rather low and the risks for you are rather high.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS