Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 49
  1. #1
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267

    GH ? Mods, Vets, members need imput seriously

    Check this out please guys , Opionions needed..

    I have had a benign non cancer Tumor smaller than a dime for 20yrs now had 1 operation when i was 15yr old because it grew some what.

    I started My gear at 20yrs old and now i'm 28yrs old and done alot of juice almost from a -z and NO problems with tumor cause i get it checed every year never grows ..

    I never did GH and i have few kits kinda hesitant but just want get some imput on what u thin if tumor will grow.. i'm not scared to do it but want imput..

    Please vets, mods, members give me ur opinion.. i don't thin it would i mean i been on gear 8yrs and NOTHING never grew. I alays now there is chance.

  2. #2
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    Why would you even chance it?

  3. #3
    Gear's Avatar
    Gear is offline HGH/IGF/Insulin Forum ~ AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    7,795
    I wouldn't do it no matter what anyone says.

    -Gear

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,888
    Agree with above posts.
    -XL

    jing jai

  5. #5
    t-gunz's Avatar
    t-gunz is offline MONITOR~ ~ RIP ~ Gone never Forgotten
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    sydney, australia
    Posts
    3,512
    yeah not worth trying IMHO

  6. #6
    stocky121's Avatar
    stocky121 is offline VET~ Recognized Staff Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    england/north east
    Posts
    10,242
    i wouldent try it nope
    no open source posting
    keep all source request's to PM'S please


    someone once said to me a clever man learn's by his own mistake's. But a wise man learn's by the mistake's of other people.


    detailed detection times
    at least 45 day's active use and 100 posts for a source check
    unsure about the rule's please read up
    thread for first cycle choices


    SOURCE CHECKS CLICK HERE

  7. #7
    Gear's Avatar
    Gear is offline HGH/IGF/Insulin Forum ~ AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    7,795
    Wether GH will have a negative effect or not I think you pretty much got your answer mate.

    -Gear

  8. #8
    Benches505's Avatar
    Benches505 is offline 75% HGH 25% Testosterone
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Posts
    3,030
    Sounds like Russian roulette to me. forget about GH.
    Last edited by Benches505; 05-20-2007 at 08:53 AM.

  9. #9
    BG's Avatar
    BG
    BG is offline The Real Deal - AR-Platinum Elite- Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    23,093
    Thought shouldnt have even crossed your mind.

    Disclaimer-BG is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way encourage nor condone the use of any illegal substances.
    The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only.


    Everything was impossible until somebody did it!

    I've got 99 problems......but my squat/dead ain't one !!

    It doesnt matter how good looking she is, some where, some one is tired of her shit.

    Light travels faster then sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

    Great place to start researching ! http://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-s...-database.html


  10. #10
    marcus300's Avatar
    marcus300 is offline ~Retired~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    ENGLAND
    Posts
    40,921
    Don't do it, health is everything its not worth the risk

  11. #11
    THE JU-ICE is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    379
    Any brand of Gh website you go to always has a caution and says do not use if you have or have had any tumors.

  12. #12
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267
    wow so may negative opinions..

    Come on we are all hook on gear and want be bigger and be competitive in the gym , I have not read anywhere that GH will make tumor grow remember it is not canceres and all a benign tumor is a small hard ball of fluid.

    Has anyone have any real hard evidence that GH will make it grow ?

    We wall play russian roullete with gear and GH, slin and so on and we now it ain't good for our bodies..

  13. #13
    Gear's Avatar
    Gear is offline HGH/IGF/Insulin Forum ~ AR-Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    7,795
    Quote Originally Posted by ItalianMuscle
    wow so may negative opinions..

    Come on we are all hook on gear and want be bigger and be competitive in the gym , I have not read anywhere that GH will make tumor grow remember it is not canceres and all a benign tumor is a small hard ball of fluid.

    Has anyone have any real hard evidence that GH will make it grow ?

    We wall play russian roullete with gear and GH, slin and so on and we now it ain't good for our bodies..
    I don't know about you, but I am $hit scared when it comes to bad health. And even if my doc said to me "yes you can do it" I still wouldn't do it because you just never know. Yes we all want to get bigger and better but your life and health comes first bro. And yes you're right, none of these compounds we are using are good for us, but when you have a health issue such as what you have then you have to remember you are in a different boat to us mate.

    Do yourself a favour and stay of the drugs period.

    -Gear

  14. #14
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    When I was a little younger I took GH/Slin/higher doses of gear etc and didn't really think twice but now I only take Test on cycle and never exceed a gram/wk and still make consistant gains in the gym.
    Living a healthy lifestyle (eating/training) are the most important things, yea I could probably be 10-20lbs heavier if I used those compounds but the possibilities of negative sides now and later on in life just isn't worth being absolutely huge.

    Gotta think about the future and how what you do now might affect you later in life.

  15. #15
    stocky121's Avatar
    stocky121 is offline VET~ Recognized Staff Winner - $100
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    england/north east
    Posts
    10,242
    Quote Originally Posted by I**mfkr
    When I was a little younger I took GH/Slin/higher doses of gear etc and didn't really think twice but now I only take Test on cycle and never exceed a gram/wk and still make consistant gains in the gym.
    Living a healthy lifestyle (eating/training) are the most important things, yea I could probably be 10-20lbs heavier if I used those compounds but the possibilities of negative sides now and later on in life just isn't worth being absolutely huge.

    Gotta think about the future and how what you do now might affect you later in life.

    couldent have said it better my friend
    no open source posting
    keep all source request's to PM'S please


    someone once said to me a clever man learn's by his own mistake's. But a wise man learn's by the mistake's of other people.


    detailed detection times
    at least 45 day's active use and 100 posts for a source check
    unsure about the rule's please read up
    thread for first cycle choices


    SOURCE CHECKS CLICK HERE

  16. #16
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267
    So all of you saying No GH ? not if with low iu a day ?

    I have had no sides from gear and i done alot of gear over last
    7 8 yrs, and what i have never grew and isn't a concern.
    I don't even think about it.

    Is there any facts that GH makes it grow ?

    They say gear causes Benign tumors but hey i have one size of dot
    since i been on 8yrs and never ever grow and i get mri every year.

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    3,888
    It looks like you want someone to just to agree with you so you feel better about doing it. Some very knowledgabe guys have taken the time to reply in this thread and all of them have warned you against it, take heed.
    -XL

    jing jai

  18. #18
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267
    And I appreciate it really but i'm just saying if i been on gear and it hasn't grown in last 8yrs , why would GH make it grow i just wanting to see some facts . Thats all..

    I know alot guys on here are very experienced , but have u ever heard or now a person or even read that had non growing benign tumor and gh made it grow

  19. #19
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    Why not get the tumor removed?

    What do you think GH will do for you that a properly setup diet and training program can't?

  20. #20
    BG's Avatar
    BG
    BG is offline The Real Deal - AR-Platinum Elite- Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    23,093
    Here you go, food for thought.....


    Development of a polyclonal antiserum for the
    detection of the isoforms of the receptors for human
    growth hormone -releasing hormone on tumors
    Gabor L. Toller*†‡§, Judit E. Horvath*†‡§, Andrew V. Schally*†¶, Gabor Halmos*†, Jozsef L. Varga*†, Kate Groot*†,
    David Chism*†, and Marta Zarandi*†
    *Endocrine, Polypeptide, and Cancer Institute, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, New Orleans, LA 70112-1262; and †***artment of Medicine, Section of
    Experimental Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA 70112
    Contributed by Andrew V. Schally, September 8, 2004
    Antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) inhibit
    the growth of various human cancers by multiple mechanisms,
    which include direct effects on tumor cells through the splice
    variants (SV) of the GHRH receptor. Our findings suggest that the
    tumoral protein encoded by SV 1 (SV1) is a likely functional
    receptor. The aim of this study was to develop a polyclonal
    antiserum against a polypeptide analog of segment 1–25 of the
    putative SV1 receptor protein. Rabbits were immunized with [Ala-
    23]SV1 (1–25)-Tyr-26-Cys-27-NH2 as a hapten, conjugated to BSA or
    keyhole limpet hemocyanin. The antisera thus generated were
    evaluated by RIA for binding to the radiolabeled hapten. The
    specificity and sensitivity of the antisera were studied on xenografts
    of RL and HT human non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. The sera
    raised against keyhole limpet hemocyanin-SV1 hapten, showed
    binding values of 50–75% at a 1:56,000 dilution. In Western blot
    analyses, the purified polyclonal antibody recognized a specific
    signal with a molecular mass of 40 kDa in RL and HT lymphomas.
    This band corresponds to the estimated molecular mass of the
    GHRH receptor isoform encoded by SV1. RT-PCR and ligand binding
    studies also revealed the expression of SV1 and the presence
    of high-affinity binding sites for GHRH on RL and HT tumors.
    Because the antiserum developed recognizes the tumoral GHRH
    receptor protein encoded by SV1, it should be of value in various
    investigations.
    splice variant  growth hormone-releasing hormone receptor  polyclonal
    antibody  non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma
    Antagonists of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH)
    inhibit the growth of experimental human cancer cell lines
    xenografted into nude mice or cultured in vitro and are being
    developed for cancer therapy (1–4). To design still more potent
    antagonists, we have to fully understand their mechanism of
    action. GHRH antagonists suppress tumor growth through
    indirect and direct pathways. The indirect mechanism operates
    through a suppression of the growth hormone release from the
    pituitary and the resulting inhibition of the production of
    insulin -like growth factor I in the liver (1–11). However, the
    principal action of GHRH antagonists is probably exerted
    directly on tumors and appears to be mediated by specific
    receptors for GHRH antagonists on cancer cells (1–9, 11–13).
    Although the mRNA for GHRH and immunologically active
    GHRH were demonstrated in various human tumor cells, the
    mRNAfor human pituitaryGHRHreceptor (GHRH-R) has not
    been detected on these tumor cells or any of the other cancer
    models (11, 14, 15).
    Because of the structural similarities between GHRH and
    vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), the receptors for VIP could
    be a target for the GHRH antagonists, but GHRH antagonists
    inhibit the proliferation of MiaPaCa-2 human pancreatic tumor
    cells, which do not express the receptors for VIP (13). Moreover,
    in LNCaP human prostatic carcinoma cells, which are positive
    for the VIP receptors, GHRH antagonists inhibit tumor growth
    more powerfully than the antagonists of VIP (13).
    These and other findings (1–15) suggested the involvement of
    specific receptors for GHRH antagonists on human cancers. We
    then reported the expression of four splice variants (SVs) of the
    full-length human GHRH-R in normal tissues and certain cancer
    cell lines on the basis of sequence analyses of cDNA encoding
    these receptors (16, 17). The deduced amino acid sequence of
    one of these SVs, called SV1, shows a close similarity to that of
    the full-length GHRH. However, the first 89 aa in the extracellular
    domain at the N terminus of the pituitary GHRH receptor
    are replaced in SV1 by a different, 25-aa polypeptide chain (16).
    Other studies show that, although the N-terminal extracellular
    domain plays an important role in the interaction between
    GHRH and the pituitary GHRH-R, the replacement of this
    domain with the N terminus of the receptor for VIP or secretin
    does not lead to the complete loss of function of the receptor
    (18). Unlike the other three SVs, the SV1 has all seven transmembrane
    domains and the whole third intracellular loop, the
    latter being critical for the interaction with G proteins (16,
    19–21).
    On the basis of these structural characteristics, the SV1 might
    be able to respond to GHRH and its antagonistic analogs and
    activate the signal transduction system of the tumor cells. The
    expression of the mRNA for SV1 has been detected, along with
    high-affinity binding sites for the radiolabeled GHRH antagonist
    JV-1-42, on a wide variety of human cancers, including
    gastroenteropancreatic, renal, lung, and prostatic tumor cell
    lines and surgical specimens of human prostate cancer (22–25).
    A comparison of the binding characteristics of GHRH, VIP,
    pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide, and GHRH
    antagonists revealed that GHRH antagonists bind more powerfully
    to the membrane fraction of CAKI-I human renal cell
    adenocarcinoma than to the other peptides (17). High affinity of
    the antagonists to the tumoral receptor facilitates their selective
    uptake from the circulation onto the tumor tissue (17, 24). In
    addition, GHRH increased the proliferation of NIH 3T3 mouse
    fibroblasts transfected with the plasmid expressing the mRNA
    for SV1, and this effect was inhibited by the GHRH antagonist
    JV-1-38 in a dose-***endent manner (26).
    Abbreviations: GHRH, growth hormone-releasing hormone; GHRH-R, GHRH receptor; SV,
    splice variant; VIP, vasoactive intestinal peptide; KLH, keyhole limpet hemocyanin.
    ‡G.L.T. and J.E.H. contributed equally to this work.
    §On leave of absence from: ***artment of Anatomy, University of Pe´ cs Medical School,
    H-7643 Pe´ cs, Hungary.
    ¶To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Veterans Affairs Medical Center, 1601
    Perdido Street, New Orleans, LA 70112-1262. E-mail: [email protected].
    On leave of absence from: ***artment of Medical Chemistry, Albert Szent-Gyo¨ rgyi Medical
    Center, University of Szeged, H-6720 Szeged, Hungary.
    © 2004 by The National Academy of Sciences of the USA
    15160–15165  PNAS  October 19, 2004  vol. 101  no. 42 www.pnas.orgcgidoi10.1073pnas.0406348101
    Last edited by BG; 05-21-2007 at 02:11 PM.

    Disclaimer-BG is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way encourage nor condone the use of any illegal substances.
    The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only.


    Everything was impossible until somebody did it!

    I've got 99 problems......but my squat/dead ain't one !!

    It doesnt matter how good looking she is, some where, some one is tired of her shit.

    Light travels faster then sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.

    Great place to start researching ! http://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-s...-database.html


  21. #21
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267
    Ok i understand little what that means but not all..

    That talks about canceress cells of tumor but mine is non
    all just small little dot like a small hard peeple of fluid..

    Has there ever been study on were gh makes tumors grow ?

    Now they say gear can cause tumors and mine never grew Why is that Luc i doubt that for 8yrs .. Any studies .. explain why

  22. #22
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267
    I was reading something yesterday i should of copy past it.
    It was on HGH and effect on excisting ne-growing benign tumor
    and said that they test in in mice and HGH
    didn't accelerate the growth of tumor.

    Let me see if i can find it

  23. #23
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267
    I been doing alot of research on net and found no evidence that
    HGH can activate or accelerate a Non active benign tumor growth..

  24. #24
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    I'd go ahead and take it and then report back your results in 6months..

    If you have a huge tumor I'm sorry, we're just trying to look out for your health and the fact that GH gives VERY minimal results for the cost and risks.
    -B D
    DO NOT ASK FOR A SOURCE, NONE SHALL BE GIVEN.
    -NO SOURCE CHECKS!-

    [email protected]
    If asking cycle advice Post up Stats/previous cycle experience/goals!

    If asking diet advice Post Stats/current diet/goals!

    “Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same.”


    I B D
    AR VET

  25. #25
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267
    bro no huge tumor,
    A benign tumor is like a hard ball of fluid.. Thats all (simply)
    There are diff types of tumors..

    I'm talking about a benign tumor that is smaller than a dime
    Non-active state for 12 Yrs now and i bee on every type
    of steroid possible (almost) stacking and what not for 7yrs now.

    Always monitor it every yr MRI and not growing.

    explain why ???? and please don't be wise and say luck

  26. #26
    Random is offline RETIRED VET
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Posts
    3,368
    ^^^it doest matter how many different steroids you have been on for however many years (to my knowledge that is) gear will not make a tumor grow, GH and all other peptides will and could, why keep posting for someone to say what u want to hear, hell, people smoke cigarettes every day year after year after the surgeon general tells them not to, tells them it causes side effects including lung cancer....so if youre goin to use it, Use it then, why bother us to admit what u want to hear, after all i think its safe to assume many of us are not doctors, why dont u ask a doc..

    CD

  27. #27
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    I just suggested you do it and report back, be our guinea pig please.

    Let us know how it turns out.

  28. #28
    Titleist's Avatar
    Titleist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,357
    Bro, you have had many Vets chime in on this one with their opinion and what they would do. I know it isn't what you want to hear, but I agree as well. It is too risky for my blood.

    Consult with your doctor and see what he thinks. Get him to give you his professional opinion on the matter, then go from there.

  29. #29
    TheNextBigThing is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    379
    Gear has nothing to do with formation or growth of tumors so that is a moot point. One of the main causes of tumor growth is IGF (i.e. if you have a tumor already it will grow, I haven't read anything that says it will make you grow one). There is alot of liturature out there on this subject and I suggest you read it. If you do try this anyway, I hope that you keep a log because this would disprove alot of what is believed about the formation and growth of tumors.

  30. #30
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267
    Guys I really do appreciate all the replie's that i got from this post.
    I mean there is alot of say not do it and say i don't wanna hear it , I just wanted proof , Facts , articles on does HGH make a non-active Tumor grow (benign tumor) , My neuorlogist awhile back said it is like a dead cell sitting there.

    I think i will ask my primary care doc, what u think
    if i do it is confidential correct

    Thanks guys

  31. #31
    IBdmfkr's Avatar
    IBdmfkr is offline AR VET
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    10,326
    I'd ask a specialist.. asking a primary care doctor this question would be out of his league IMO.
    -B D
    DO NOT ASK FOR A SOURCE, NONE SHALL BE GIVEN.
    -NO SOURCE CHECKS!-

    [email protected]
    If asking cycle advice Post up Stats/previous cycle experience/goals!

    If asking diet advice Post Stats/current diet/goals!

    “Your desire to change must be greater than your desire to stay the same.”


    I B D
    AR VET

  32. #32
    ItalianMuscle's Avatar
    ItalianMuscle is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Boston, MA
    Posts
    1,267
    Ok i will ask my neuoroligist .. I have one og the besat
    at the Mass Gen Hospital for last 15yrs, see what he say

    I wonder if annyone can find any studies of HGH and benign tumors.

  33. #33
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    IN your walls
    Posts
    574
    I had a gaint tumor removed about 5 years ago it was the worst time of my life. I went in to the doctor the best shape of my life 186lbs 6% shreaded. came out 2 weeks later 146lbs I could hardly keep my head up.I couldnt lift a gallon of milk for 2 months. I wouldnt wish that on my worst enemy. Im going to do some hgh but i have no tumor's left in me. I now you will do what you want just be ready to acept what happens to you weather it is good or bad.

  34. #34
    perfectbeast2001's Avatar
    perfectbeast2001 is offline "king of free stuff" / Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    7,979
    I cannot believe you are considering this. GH gives such minimal results it just is not worth it, even if you were an IFBB pro it wouldn't be worth it (and you aren't). You will get all kinds of opinions if you dig deep enough on this subject. That is because no one really knows for sure. Unfortunately there are not many studies done on Bodybuilders and drug use. Although you can probably find a few studies using rats,aids victims and petri dishes. Are you willing to risk your life becase a petri dish study suggested that GH wont grow benign tumours.
    The point is that in theory IT COULD. Dont be ignorant. Stick with AS and thank god you are healthy and fit enough to enjoy using AS and training with weights.

  35. #35
    THE JU-ICE is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    379

    Do it!!!!

    Do it!!!! Prove everyone who has ever studied this drug wrong. You should do twice as much just to emphasis your point. GH is called growth hormone for a reason, it makes shit grow.

  36. #36
    ss01 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by ItalianMuscle
    wow so may negative opinions..

    Come on we are all hook on gear and want be bigger and be competitive in the gym , I have not read anywhere that GH will make tumor grow remember it is not canceres and all a benign tumor is a small hard ball of fluid.

    Has anyone have any real hard evidence that GH will make it grow ?

    We wall play russian roullete with gear and GH, slin and so on and we now it ain't good for our bodies..
    Quote Originally Posted by ItalianMuscle
    I been doing alot of research on net and found no evidence that
    HGH can activate or accelerate a Non active benign tumor growth..
    That's because THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE that GH grows benign tumors. If you have a full-blown cancer, then GH will help it grow somewhat, not that it will make MUCH of a difference anyway, in this worst-case scenario which is not yours..

    Listen. Your body makes GH already. What is the #1 hormone released by your body as you exercise, responsible for casically ALL the HEALTH-ENHANCING EFFECTS OF EXERCISE, INCLUDING LOWERED CANCER RATE? GH.

    I would not hesitate for one second bro, since all that natural GH you have been making did absolutely nothing to that "tumor".

  37. #37
    perfectbeast2001's Avatar
    perfectbeast2001 is offline "king of free stuff" / Retired
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    uk
    Posts
    7,979
    I hope that last post was a joke.....

  38. #38
    Titleist's Avatar
    Titleist is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,357
    Quote Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
    I hope that last post was a joke.....
    It wasn't. This is coming from the same guy whose take on IGF was backed by no studies whatsoever.

  39. #39
    fred9's Avatar
    fred9 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Holland
    Posts
    598
    it's quite well known that igf can accelerate the growth of cancer cells...there are some ways to take large doses of hgh without this risk by blokcing the igf-receptors...u have then still the fatburning properties of hgh(which is dose ***endent)

    but also AS increases igf output and especially when also nolvadex is administrated...nolvadex upregulates the igf-receptors...

    for studies google: igf+cancer

  40. #40
    ss01 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Montreal, Canada
    Posts
    204
    Quote Originally Posted by perfectbeast2001
    I hope that last post was a joke.....
    Perhaps if you studied real science instead of broscience you would know without the shadow of a doubt whether or not it is a joke.

    But then again, you would not have 6,000 posts on this board... You would hang out at a place where people know stuff.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •