Gh/opinions

**cstrong** · 10-09-2007, 03:44 PM

ok most people think that using gh is a waste of money, including myself.. so what the hell is everyones opinion on pro bodybuilders physiques? is it insulin or the combo of both? i mean these guys are gigantic unreal human beings.. this is just an opinion related question

**ricker35910** · 10-09-2007, 06:52 PM

i don't think gh is a waste of money, it just takes time to get results. pro's take double the amount that most people take along with a shit load of mg's

**olr77** · 10-09-2007, 09:09 PM

Yeah I personally never want to be built like one of the best u see on tv. I like GH for the weight loss and how it makes me feel.

**Gear** · 10-10-2007, 02:05 AM

GH isn't a waste of money, however, if you are going to use it for 6 months then I believe the benefits are not worth the price. Professional bodybuilders have been using all kind of peptides and androgens for many years and that's why they look the way they do. They also use doses we wouldn't even dream of, but, many of these users are also very unhealthy individuals as well.

Many of them have very good genetics and it is not only the drugs that's respincible for the way they look, it's also years of dieting and training that has a lot to do with it.

Many factors come into play when it comes to physique, not the just the drugs.

-Gear

**cstrong** · 10-10-2007, 04:06 PM

Originally Posted by Gear

GH isn't a waste of money, however, if you are going to use it for 6 months then I believe the benefits are not worth the price. Professional bodybuilders have been using all kind of peptides and androgens for many years and that's why they look the way they do. They also use doses we wouldn't even dream of, but, many of these users are also very unhealthy individuals as well.

Many of them have very good genetics and it is not only the drugs that's respincible for the way they look, it's also years of dieting and training that has a lot to do with it.

Many factors come into play when it comes to physique, not the just the drugs.

-Gear

good shit gear, thats kinda what i was getting at..i dont hear most people talk about the muscle they gained but more the fat loss..im just curious as too how bodybuilders grow at such a rapid rate from yr to yr..take ronnie for instance we've seen his body transform tremendously over the past 5-10 yrs? what did he change? im sure he was takin the same stuff.. i just dont understand how you get to that level..i just wanna hear peoples views and opinions

**Gear** · 10-10-2007, 09:48 PM

Originally Posted by cstrong

good shit gear, thats kinda what i was getting at..i dont hear most people talk about the muscle they gained but more the fat loss..im just curious as too how bodybuilders grow at such a rapid rate from yr to yr..take ronnie for instance we've seen his body transform tremendously over the past 5-10 yrs? what did he change? im sure he was takin the same stuff.. i just dont understand how you get to that level..i just wanna hear peoples views and opinions

5 - 10yrs of training is enough time to go through such transformations. If you follow the protocol that Ronnie has followed in the last 10yrs, I bet you would look a lot different 10yrs later. Perhaps you wouldn't look like Ronnie as he has probably been taking HGH/insulin and the rest of the peptides and adrogens since he was 2, but your body will defenitely change within that time frame if you do what he has done for the last 10yrs.

-Gear

**cstrong** · 10-11-2007, 09:59 AM

Originally Posted by Gear

5 - 10yrs of training is enough time to go through such transformations. If you follow the protocol that Ronnie has followed in the last 10yrs, I bet you would look a lot different 10yrs later. Perhaps you wouldn't look like Ronnie as he has probably been taking HGH/insulin and the rest of the peptides and adrogens since he was 2, but your body will defenitely change within that time frame if you do what he has done for the last 10yrs.

-Gear

yea your right... i was just curious about the combo of insulin/gh.. that must be it.. cause i know alot of people that do it without insulin and just get great fat loss

**InsaneInTheMembrane** · 10-12-2007, 02:13 AM

I've used Hgh three times (5 months average each time) and I can safely conclude:

1. If you're using it for fatloss, then its a gigantic waste of money because there are better ways to do that.
2. If you're using it for LBM gain, it is also a long and slow process, and the dosages have to be high, so will your bill! AAS is better for this.
3. HOWEVER, I CANNOT DENY that the hgh has allowed me the ability to keep my post cycle gains... even when I didnt cycle for an entire year and ate like cr@p, my LBM stayed... that of course, is the magic of muscle hyperplasia I suppose...and that is WORTH the money if you are not planning to be a pro BBer and cycle for the entirety of your career but just want to do a few cycles over the span of 2-3 years and want to keep the gains for a long time after you stop OR you take really long breaks between your cycles

**vitor** · 10-12-2007, 09:39 AM

Originally Posted by InsaneInTheMembrane

I've used Hgh three times (5 months average each time) and I can safely conclude:

1. If you're using it for fatloss, then its a gigantic waste of money because there are better ways to do that.
2. If you're using it for LBM gain, it is also a long and slow process, and the dosages have to be high, so will your bill! AAS is better for this.
3. HOWEVER, I CANNOT DENY that the hgh has allowed me the ability to keep my post cycle gains... even when I didnt cycle for an entire year and ate like cr@p, my LBM stayed... that of course, is the magic of muscle hyperplasia I suppose...and that is WORTH the money if you are not planning to be a pro BBer and cycle for the entirety of your career but just want to do a few cycles over the span of 2-3 years and want to keep the gains for a long time after you stop OR you take really long breaks between your cycles

I feel the same way!

The reasen ime using GH is because of hyperplasmia, everything else is secondary.