Thread: CJC-1295/GHRP-6 Log
Hybrid View
-
02-23-2012, 06:44 AM #1
Interesting...from my research clearing time of GH shouldn't change w/ either injection method (subq or IM). That being said if subq is irritating the point of injection then I see nothing wrong w/ IM injections, but I don't think it will effect the endogenous GH spike or clearing time.
-
02-23-2012, 12:22 PM #2
Very true as that is what I've read and researched myself, the only difference I see, both from text and personal experience, is that the GH spike sets in faster through IM opposed to sub q...I've read going IV sets in even quicker, bit I wouldn't dare put a pin my vein to inject...no joke lol. I recommend trying it swifto and document your experience to either make or break my case lol
-
02-25-2012, 06:20 AM #3
In humans, a dose of 1.5mcg/kg (150mcg for a 100kg male) of GHRP-2 or GHRP-6 when combined with a modified GRF 1-29 of equal dosage creates a three-hour pulse of GH
that is double the amplitude of an 8 IU synthetic (e.coli derived) growth hormone dose.[4] IV, intramuscular and subcutaneous routes lead to different onset times but roughly
similar peaks and declines. Due to ease of synthesis (as opposed to the complicated process of creating GH from e. coli), safety, and lower cost, modified GRF 1-29 together
with GHRP-2, GHRP- 6 or the newer Ipamorelin, taken as part of comprehensive therapy may supplant conventional exogenous GH therapy.
Here is a little bit of text that I read that started my research into different administration routes...im hoping the IM route is treating ya well swifto! Though I find there still is a little bit of irritation when inj into the muscle and I'll get a little red bump. Its not really itchy but you can feel the slight irritation.
-
02-27-2012, 06:45 AM #4
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Cytomel dosage ?
05-15-2024, 09:31 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS