Results 1 to 27 of 27
  1. #1
    likebeckam22's Avatar
    likebeckam22 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16

    new pics. A work in progress.....

    You can tell which picture was taken first. Went from 165 to 185. BF% went from 18% to 9%. Want to get to 200lbs and 6% BF. Hard work pays off. I love the gym.....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails new pics. A work in progress.....-dscn0218.jpg   new pics. A work in progress.....-dscn0183-1.jpg  

  2. #2
    Snrf's Avatar
    Snrf is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Snrf 2 - Bojangles 0
    Posts
    5,829
    yeah nice shape bud, not 18% or 9% in either of those pics though. How you measuring your bodyfat?

  3. #3
    Mighty Joe's Avatar
    Mighty Joe is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2001
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    2,142
    Nice work....Keep it up.

    MJ

  4. #4
    Timm1704's Avatar
    Timm1704 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    ninja dojo, UK
    Posts
    4,082
    you have very nice shape, but they look like the same pic. cant see any added size or fatloss. both pics id say 10-12% bodyfat

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ruckin with the Rozzers!!
    Posts
    743
    yeah sorry,cant see much difference between the 2 pics either, but looking good though.
    i too would say around 12%bf.
    keep up the good work

  6. #6
    Jiesel's Avatar
    Jiesel is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Mid-East Coast
    Posts
    477
    can definatley see a difference, how much time was that in? Your after pic you look about 11%....before pic, maybe 16%, pry closer to 15%, nice work regardless

  7. #7
    t-gunz's Avatar
    t-gunz is offline MONITOR~ ~ RIP ~ Gone never Forgotten
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    sydney, australia
    Posts
    3,512
    great work bro... keep up the good work... what was the time gap between your change???

  8. #8
    Timm1704's Avatar
    Timm1704 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    ninja dojo, UK
    Posts
    4,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Jiesel
    can definatley see a difference, how much time was that in? Your after pic you look about 11%....before pic, maybe 16%, pry closer to 15%, nice work regardless
    ok how many pics does your comp show? mine only shows two, and there is ABSOLUTELY NO CHANGE in his physique. it is not my eyes, it is identical. so either my computer isnt showing all the pics, or somethings alittle odd here

  9. #9
    Kale is offline ~ Vet~ I like Thai Girls
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Asia
    Posts
    12,114
    Quote Originally Posted by Timm1704
    ok how many pics does your comp show? mine only shows two, and there is ABSOLUTELY NO CHANGE in his physique. it is not my eyes, it is identical. so either my computer isnt showing all the pics, or somethings alittle odd here
    I agree there is no difference and he certainly is nowhere near 18% in either of thos pics

  10. #10
    likebeckam22's Avatar
    likebeckam22 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16
    It was a 3 month gap. I also gain alot of muscle in my legs that I didnt have before. I lost alot of fat around the abs area, lovehandles and lower back. They I mean the phitness instructors took my measurement and Im almost positive I was around 15-18%bf in one of those pics. Also the other pic I was around 9%. Thats what he told me, unless he lied, either way I was happy with my results, and I will get bigger. I will keep myall posted...

  11. #11
    likebeckam22's Avatar
    likebeckam22 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16
    fitness, nice spelling

  12. #12
    Jiesel's Avatar
    Jiesel is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Mid-East Coast
    Posts
    477
    well I must be the only one, there is a good difference in his love handles and definition of his abs

  13. #13
    Timm1704's Avatar
    Timm1704 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    ninja dojo, UK
    Posts
    4,082
    Quote Originally Posted by Jiesel
    well I must be the only one, there is a good difference in his love handles and definition of his abs

    if there is, its marginal. i spent a good 5 minutes studying and comparing each area of his body, just to make sure i wasnt going blind. his abs do look ever so slightly better in the 1st pic, but that could be because it is taken from a further distance.

    i am not knocking likebekham22's pysique or results, just saying that there is no difference in these pics. you definately look good, and i am not discrediting you in any way, just saying that if you have gained 20lbs, its all in your legs and/or back thickness (???), and if you have lost 9% bodyfat, where from?

    you either had alot of fat on your legs, or your fitness instructor fvcked up.

    like you said, you WILL get bigger, and with your shape, you will look really great when you do add 20lbs

  14. #14
    likebeckam22's Avatar
    likebeckam22 is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    16
    Thanks guys for the motivation. I am a constant learner and can take constructive critisism. I will post more pics soon. Watch the progress... Have yall seen my other threads on my cycle????????

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ruckin with the Rozzers!!
    Posts
    743
    an old trick personal instructors used to do is when taking initial measurements they add a little bf% or inchs on the waist or knock off a little size of the muscle measurements.

    then in 6 weeks or whatever they take real measurements and the customer is chuffed and carries on paying the fee even if there is no real difference.

    not saying this happened to you but i again studied the pics and still cant see a difference but you do look great none the less,so fair play for that

  16. #16
    thetank's Avatar
    thetank is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    May 2002
    Location
    im natty.no source cheks
    Posts
    2,165
    if you cant see any difference at all there then you just dont have a very critical eye, or are not looking very hard...look at his lats, his waste line, the cuts in his torso from his waste to his traps..hes definately noticabley leaner with some more size. very subtle angles might play tricks the way the pics are taken, but i can notice a definate difference. if he did a most muscular or front double bi pose in both pics i think the difference would be alot easier to tell, but i can definately see progress.
    keep it up dude

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Under A Bar
    Posts
    4,632
    I can't see that much of a difference either.

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Ruckin with the Rozzers!!
    Posts
    743
    tank,sorry but 20lbs and 9%bf is loads especially on someone as lean as him,anyone with 18%bf will never have such a prodominant 6 pack and even you cant argue with that.

    the camera been different distances still doesnt mean a gain of 20lb and 9%bf loss.just think of a magnifying glass,same thing but on a slighter scale.

    he looks great yeah but those very slight differences dont accont to 20lbs.sorry

  19. #19
    DecimaMAS's Avatar
    DecimaMAS is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    157
    Quote Originally Posted by likebeckam22
    You can tell which picture was taken first. Went from 165 to 185. BF% went from 18% to 9%. Want to get to 200lbs and 6% BF. Hard work pays off. I love the gym.....
    Congrats. Keep up the hard work!!

  20. #20
    briancb1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    839
    165lbs @18%BF = about 135lbs of Lean Body Mass

    185lbs @ 9%BF = about 168lbs of Lean Body Mass

    That means in 3 months or 90 days, you gained 33 pounds of muscle and LOST 13lbs of fat, all natural? Thats gaining a 1/3lb of muscle a day...

    Whats your secret?

  21. #21
    Snrf's Avatar
    Snrf is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Snrf 2 - Bojangles 0
    Posts
    5,829
    Quote Originally Posted by briancb1
    165lbs @18%BF = about 135lbs of Lean Body Mass

    185lbs @ 9%BF = about 168lbs of Lean Body Mass

    That means in 3 months or 90 days, you gained 33 pounds of muscle and LOST 13lbs of fat, all natural? Thats gaining a 1/3lb of muscle a day...

    Whats your secret?
    500mg tren ed

  22. #22
    briancb1 is offline Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    839
    Quote Originally Posted by Snrfmaster
    500mg tren ed
    If that were the case, I think his internal organs would pack their bags and take the long way home....

    I'm pretty sure he is natural - he didn't specify any gear or cycles.

  23. #23
    Timm1704's Avatar
    Timm1704 is offline Anabolic Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    ninja dojo, UK
    Posts
    4,082
    Quote Originally Posted by thetank
    if you cant see any difference at all there then you just dont have a very critical eye, or are not looking very hard...look at his lats, his waste line, the cuts in his torso from his waste to his traps..hes definately noticabley leaner with some more size. very subtle angles might play tricks the way the pics are taken, but i can notice a definate difference. if he did a most muscular or front double bi pose in both pics i think the difference would be alot easier to tell, but i can definately see progress.
    keep it up dude
    i studied both pics hard, side by side, breaking down each bodypart, and there is no difference that couldnt be attributed to different lighting, or a minimally different posture. and even then the difference is almost non-existent

  24. #24
    Snrf's Avatar
    Snrf is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Snrf 2 - Bojangles 0
    Posts
    5,829
    Quote Originally Posted by briancb1
    If that were the case, I think his internal organs would pack their bags and take the long way home....

    I'm pretty sure he is natural - he didn't specify any gear or cycles.
    it was a joke

    obviously he didnt gain 33lbs while losing bodyfat, and obviously he didnt use 500mg tren ed.

  25. #25
    boostedevo8's Avatar
    boostedevo8 is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    490
    good build ...but there is no diffrence in BF in those pics

  26. #26
    blazerelf is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Panama
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by Snrf View Post
    500mg tren ed
    well then is not natural =)

  27. #27
    beatango2008's Avatar
    beatango2008 is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    1,449
    why must you bump threads from 2 years ago....

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •