Just got this in...any good?

**shrpskn** · 03-17-2006, 01:13 AM

Just got this in...anyone have any feedback on this one. Wondering if it's some good stuff or what?

**IBdmfkr** · 03-17-2006, 01:15 AM

Looks like a cheap UGL. Poor label + packaging. Not saying it's not good, just giving my first impression from pic.

Not to mention not a good combo of drugs either. Prop+Tren would normally be run for longer and higher dosage than the Mast. Doesn't make sense to put it all together and seems like it would be difficult to get three short esters to hold at such a high concentration.

**shrpskn** · 03-17-2006, 01:30 AM

Originally Posted by IBdmfkr

Looks like a cheap UGL. Poor label + packaging. Not saying it's not good, just giving my first impression from pic.

Not to mention not a good combo of drugs either. Prop+Tren would normally be run for longer and higher dosage than the Mast. Doesn't make sense to put it all together and seems like it would be difficult to get three short esters to hold at such a high concentration.

Yeah, the price was too good to pass up, so I thought I'd give it a "shot"

Couple days in now @ 1cc e/d and cut with a 1/2 cc of B-12. Injections are painless, and prop soreness is tolerable. So I guess I'll wait and see as far as results go.

Thanks for the input bro...if it doesn't seem like a proper combo due to proper dosage and lengths you'd run these at, what would you suggest the proper length one would run this particular combo for? If you don't mind me asking.

**shrpskn** · 03-17-2006, 01:38 AM

Perhaps I'll have it tested to see if the label is as it claims...

**Geriguy** · 03-17-2006, 07:53 AM

I don't think this stuff contains all of those steroids printed on the label...
And 75mg/ml from what??? 50mg prop, 15mg tren , 10 mg masteron ? Or 60mg masteron 10mg prop and 5mg tren???

Bro, don't use it!

**IBdmfkr** · 03-17-2006, 08:26 AM

I think it is trying to claim 75mg/mL of EACH lol,
I'd run those three compounds like this:
1-10 Prop 100mg/day
1-8 Tren 75mg/day
6-10 Mast 100mgEOD.

Depends on your stats/goals/BF as well as other things. I'll keep it short this is the pic forum

Just don't think that combo is in that bottle IMO.

Question, does it have slight yellowish tint to the liquid? Painless with 225mg/mL of fast esters? Fishy.

**farrebarre** · 03-17-2006, 08:35 AM

it has my initials on it, must be good stuff..
not but seriously i agree with IBdmfkr

**Smart-tony** · 03-17-2006, 08:42 AM

I will take a look at my 2006 anabolic book later when i'm off work for you.

**powerbodybuilder** · 03-17-2006, 10:04 AM

Its a nice size bottle I'll give it that.

BG · 03-17-2006, 10:09 AM

Originally Posted by powerbodybuilder

Its a nice size bottle I'll give it that.

I was thinking same thing

**Geriguy** · 03-17-2006, 10:30 AM

Well, it is an UG lab with only one person in the business. He accept all of the payment methods... He has other stuff like test enth and oral turinabol (in capsules...)
The label of this bottly is totally a .......................imitation...
Maybe it contains something... or nothing
Nobody knows

**IBdmfkr** · 03-17-2006, 11:40 AM

Yes I've seen pics of those before, but not the one posted at first.

**Grizzly420** · 03-17-2006, 12:29 PM

I love the mixture

**shrpskn** · 03-17-2006, 03:49 PM

Originally Posted by IBdmfkr

I think it is trying to claim 75mg/mL of EACH lol,
Question, does it have slight yellowish tint to the liquid? Painless with 225mg/mL of fast esters? Fishy.

The vial is claiming to have 75mg/mL of each compound for a total of 225mg/mL, like IBdmfkr stated as well....

Yes, liquid is yellowish tinted, I could post better lighted pics that show the liquid if anyone wants to see...
and what I meant by painless is that the injection itself is painless, but the site of injection is still sore the next day or so, but to a tolerable point. I'm also cutting it with B-12, as mentioned in an above post. So that may be helping to tame next day soreness.

I guess the main question I have for everyone is: Has anyone used or heard of this particular UGLs' products and had good results or heard good feedback??
Just a legitimacy question so-to-speak.

**shrpskn** · 03-17-2006, 03:52 PM

Originally Posted by Smart-tony

I will take a look at my 2006 anabolic book later when i'm off work for you.

Thanks bro...

**shrpskn** · 03-17-2006, 04:02 PM

Here's a better lit pic of this one that shows the color of the liquid much better...if your wondering what the little red bubbles are at the bottom of the vial, that's a little of B-12 that accidently slipped into the vial when I was drawing the two up into my syringe.

***Alex*** · 03-17-2006, 04:04 PM

looks cheap!

**shrpskn** · 03-17-2006, 04:05 PM

Originally Posted by alex7674

looks cheap!

For a 50mL jug and the compounds that it claims to contain, it was a steal...still wondering about legitimacy though.

**shrpskn** · 03-23-2006, 01:02 AM

Anyone else have any feedback on this one??? Good or bad?

Seems not many have heard of this one...

Any response would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Shrpskn

**testosterona** · 03-23-2006, 12:18 PM

Originally Posted by shrpskn

Anyone else have any feedback on this one??? Good or bad?

Seems not many have heard of this one...

Any response would be much appreciated.

Thanks.

Shrpskn

iv used EB's test prop, cialis, clen , and winny with good success. wasn['t underdosed enough for me to notice. good stuff for the price IMO

**TheRel33** · 03-23-2006, 02:23 PM

never seen it let me know how it works out?

**shrpskn** · 03-24-2006, 03:24 AM

Originally Posted by TheRel33

never seen it let me know how it works out?

Will do.....

**en1222** · 03-30-2006, 11:40 AM

Any updates on these products? Do they seem to be as they claim?

**en1222** · 04-23-2006, 01:29 PM

Originally Posted by shrpskn

Will do.....

any updates??

**shrpskn** · 04-23-2006, 03:56 PM

Originally Posted by en1222

any updates??

Excellent UGL product. Amazing results....minimal sides. Can't say enough about this one. Grade A products and the best UGL I've ever come across and used yet....

Some may say "looks cheap" or, "just another cheap UGL".
Sure, labels may make it look like a cheap product or low quality, but I say: "Never judge a book by it's cover"

This "chit" is amazing.....don't knock it till you've tried his products.

**IBdmfkr** · 04-23-2006, 04:06 PM

Glad to hear everything worked out... Very true the look doesn't make the product, it just shows me if the manufactuer takes pride in what they're doing, although there are many with flashy labels and bunk gear.
Lab tests never lie.

**testosterona** · 04-25-2006, 02:03 AM

Originally Posted by shrpskn

Excellent UGL product. Amazing results....minimal sides. Can't say enough about this one. Grade A products and the best UGL I've ever come across and used yet....

Some may say "looks cheap" or, "just another cheap UGL".
Sure, labels may make it look like a cheap product or low quality, but I say: "Never judge a book by it's cover"

This "chit" is amazing.....don't knock it till you've tried his products.

i don't know about the "best UGL", but he has a huge line and easy payment.....that's the only reason why id accasionally use him. iv seen lab tests of his tbol on osbb and they came out to be 6.6mgs or something, labeled at 10mgs.....not to great imo. the only lab tests from this lab that have come out good were sent out by the lab themselves. i'm about to try their aromasin and proviron , i'll keep you updated.

**shrpskn** · 04-25-2006, 07:41 PM

Originally Posted by testosterona

i don't know about the "best UGL", but he has a huge line and easy payment.....that's the only reason why id accasionally use him. iv seen lab tests of his tbol on osbb and they came out to be 6.6mgs or something, labeled at 10mgs.....not to great imo. the only lab tests from this lab that have come out good were sent out by the lab themselves. i'm about to try their aromasin and proviron, i'll keep you updated.

Everyone is entitled to their own opinion...so my statement was made as a matter of MHO, FYI.

BTW...Lab results you saw posted at another site were results from a batch from some time ago and this particular UGL has come a long way since then. The product you mentioned, likely lost potency with time...also, them results were also posted by a competing source of his and tampering with a lab result ,IMO, should not be ruled out....so in case you don't know, I am very aware of the debate which aroused as to the dosage issues of that lab test.

I'm dropping the subject from this point forward, so don't bother responding to my reply to your statement, as this is the pics forum afterall, in case you weren't aware of that either.
Or your response to my reply will result in either no response or an intense flaming, if it warrants it, which I'm sure you wouldn't want.

Regards,
ShrpSkn

**stayinstacked** · 04-25-2006, 07:46 PM

Bro, the shit I use is a UGL, and the label looks about 10 times shittier than that, but the stuff is the ****ing shiznit!!! Plus, you can get alot of amazing blends that you cant get with brand names. I trust my UGL and have achieved far better results with them than anything

**shrpskn** · 04-25-2006, 08:04 PM

Originally Posted by stayinstacked

Bro, the shit I use is a UGL, and the label looks about 10 times shittier than that, but the stuff is the ****ing shiznit!!! Plus, you can get alot of amazing blends that you cant get with brand names. I trust my UGL and have achieved far better results with them than anything

I couldn't agree with you more bro...that is excellent to hear and as "IBdmfkr" stated above, there are "some" UGLs out there with flashy labels that turn out to have bunk product.

So IMHO, it's not the label that matters, it's what's inside that matters the most!

Great post bro,
ShrpSkn

**IBdmfkr** · 04-25-2006, 09:10 PM

Mine have a Letter and mg/mL in magic marker and they work great!

**shrpskn** · 04-25-2006, 09:42 PM

Originally Posted by IBdmfkr

Mine have a Letter and mg/mL in magic marker and they work great!

Awesome. That's excellent bro.

Like we've said before, it's not the label that makes the product, it's what's inside that makes the product.

ShrpSkn

**IBdmfkr** · 04-25-2006, 09:48 PM

Best to make it yourself so you don't have to rely on trusting other ppl with your health. Simple.

**shrpskn** · 04-25-2006, 09:55 PM

Originally Posted by IBdmfkr

Best to make it yourself so you don't have to rely on trusting other ppl with your health. Simple.

Whoa, I almost commented on your post bro before you made the correction to it, lol....I've never tried to make my own gear...too much traffic in the household to attempt it, IMO.
I would like to try it out though someday, because your point does make sense.

Until then, I think I'm solid with what I got for now...no worries to date.