Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    bestial is offline New Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Posts
    10

    What do you consider bigger?

    6'1 248 lbs or 6'5 238 lbs.

  2. #2
    OnTheSauce is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    Is this a real question? Obviously the one weighing more has more mass. Assuming bf is equal. Just tall doesn't make you big

  3. #3
    John Andrew's Avatar
    John Andrew is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Thailand
    Posts
    646
    Being tall is a definite minus for a power lifter. The strongest men I know are all under 6 ft. The toughest divisions to win are the lighter ones. Regards John

  4. #4
    krugerr's Avatar
    krugerr is offline Knowledgeable Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    UK (Nr London)
    Posts
    3,913
    Quote Originally Posted by John Andrew
    Being tall is a definite minus for a power lifter. The strongest men I know are all under 6 ft. The toughest divisions to win are the lighter ones. Regards John
    Except worlds strongest man, where they're all giants

  5. #5
    Java Man's Avatar
    Java Man is offline Known Troll
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The Matrix
    Posts
    4,327
    Quote Originally Posted by OnTheSauce View Post
    Is this a real question? Obviously the one weighing more has more mass. Assuming bf is equal. Just tall doesn't make you big
    This.

    238 at 6'5" is maybe a little above average. That's not a lot of mass for that height.

  6. #6
    Cuz's Avatar
    Cuz
    Cuz is offline VET
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    No source checks
    Posts
    8,003
    In the end id rather be tall like I am. I know I say all the time to all my gym buds "damn if I was only 5f 9 like yall were I could compete."

    6"5 is a way beyond average height, im a legit 6"2 and rarely see anyone taller than me, thers a few 6"3 guys around but after that statistics really drop down. Lou F. was 6 '5 and he still looked great I thought Arnold being 6"2 was obviously 7x O. But now you very rarely see a guy win a show over 6".

    To answer your question, as far as size goes I think the guy that's 6'1 would beat him in a show considering they are the same BF.

  7. #7
    OnTheSauce is offline Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,999
    Big to me is muscle mass. At 6'5, you'd need to outweigh a 6'1 guy by 40lbs to be equal. And at that point i would consider the 6'5 guy bigger. Since they have the same lbm, and he has height advantage. But being taller and lighter, he's def the smaller guy

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •