Thread: old vs. new
-
10-12-2004, 02:03 PM #1
old vs. new
hey fellas i was just wondering why professional bodybuilders these days are
more vascular than those of the earlier days. I am sure everyone here has seen pumping iron. Arnold and lou were not nearly as vascular as top pros of today. Is this from more advances in anabolic steroids ?, or are todays pros depleting themselves more?
thanks uttlyer dude
-
10-12-2004, 02:13 PM #2
My guess is that since they didn't use stuff like nolva, or l-dex (not sure about proviron and when it came into use) the end result was a smoother appearance. Smooth but big.
-
10-12-2004, 03:59 PM #3
duiretics
-
10-17-2004, 06:38 PM #4
bodybuilders of the 80's were much harder, more porpotioned and more vascular then bbs of today, except for maybe dexter and ahmed
check out rich gaspari
-
10-17-2004, 06:39 PM #5
rich
-
10-17-2004, 07:03 PM #6
another
-
10-17-2004, 07:04 PM #7
curtis leffler
-
10-17-2004, 07:07 PM #8
then again theirs dave palumbo
-
10-18-2004, 09:05 AM #9
BBers today are the best IMO... size and cuts... cant beat em
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS