Thread: Coleman wins again...
-
10-15-2005, 11:00 PM #1
Coleman wins again...
Personally I thought Gunter and Badell looked great. Even Cutler looked better than Ronnie. For those who say Ronnie is better than Arnold you guys must be kidding. I am not a ronnie hater either its just how I saw it, I havent seen him in any prior O competitions. Can anyone explain what made cutler and ronnie stand out more than Gunter and Badell who looked most impressive to me, other than the hype???
-
10-15-2005, 11:30 PM #2
hype, IMO.
i actually thought ronnie looked better than jay though. jay looks aweful from the side, whereas ronnie only looks bad. plus ronnie DOES have more muscle and was prolly in a little better shape.
-
10-15-2005, 11:32 PM #3
anyone have any pics of that show yet...I know it must be too early but I don't have PPV over here so I am dying to see the competitors!!
-
10-16-2005, 12:17 AM #4
i really 6thought gunther looked good, almost displayed the more classic arnold type physique
-
10-16-2005, 12:18 AM #5
Yea Jay looked twice as good as Ronnie...Ronnie is the man but I think Jay got him this year....Jays back was better than Ronnies too...WTF??? that was always Ronnies strong point!
-
10-16-2005, 08:29 AM #6Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Posts
- 140
Glad ronnie won tho , if he lost me included would of been going mad about how he lost cause he left weiders contract
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS