-
07-15-2003, 03:04 PM #81
in the past i would have gone against big ron, but after seeing his vid, and talkin to ppl about him and finding out more about him i dont think anyone in pro BBing could beat him, he has the best work ethic, and when ppl will really admit it, his body is years ahead of JC and any other pro... my vote goes to Ronnie.
-
07-20-2003, 10:44 PM #82
I hear that Ronnie will be competing at 285lbs at the 2003 Olympia. It is either a bullshit claim, designed to psyche out his competitors and get them to come in too heavy themselves (shades of Arnold's psyche-out of Ferrigno in '75), or else it is an admission that Ronnie's distended belly is forever out of control.
Maybe he's hoping that at 285, the rest of him will be so huge that the gut won't be as noticeable. I have my doubts...
-
07-21-2003, 09:22 AM #83Junior Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2002
- Posts
- 116
Best work ethic, I don't know. Sure he works hard and was a cop and all (part-time if I remember correctly), but I'd argue that any of the amateurs work harder because they generally have to hold full-time corporate jobs just to survive.
As for the freaky back issue, Dorian had the width, Ronnie the thickness.
Coming in at 285? Well considering his waist was about the same as his chest in 2001 at 265, I can't imagine him at 285 would look that good at all. People say "Oh, look at the pictures out of the 2002 O!" Well I say watch the Unbelievable, he looks the exact same.
-
10-27-2003, 09:49 AM #84Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Posts
- 543
ronnie smokes dorian in almost every aspect. ronnie has mass and shape! no one else comes close.
-
10-27-2003, 09:50 AM #85Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2002
- Location
- Dallas, TX
- Posts
- 543
ronnie smokes dorian in almost every aspect. ronnie has mass and shape! dorian just had (some) mass, not the best shape at all.no one else comes close to ronnie.
-
10-27-2003, 02:56 PM #86
Ronnie has no shape. His midsection looks like a freaking swiss ball. Abs are disgusting. Dorians cuts are all much better.
-
10-27-2003, 05:24 PM #87
I stand corrected. Ronnie came in a 285 and looked much better than he did at 265. I expect that we will eventually find out how Chad accomplished this.
-
11-14-2003, 06:14 PM #88
Gotta add this one to the pile:
-
12-01-2003, 01:56 PM #89Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 135
Originally Posted by Steele
-
12-01-2003, 06:08 PM #90RETIRED VET
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 3,368
who gives a **** about calves, such a weak and small muscle anyway, i dont even think the judges look at calves...why? because calves dont mean ****
-
12-02-2003, 08:43 AM #91Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 135
Originally Posted by CaptainDominate
captain, are you one of those seagull guys at the beach?
freakiest back= dorian
-
02-09-2004, 10:03 PM #92
doryan
-
02-10-2004, 01:24 PM #93Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 807
Ronnie - Mr. Olympia 2003
-
03-23-2004, 12:32 AM #94
those pics of Ronnie from the 2003 Olympia are unbelievable...
Last edited by retired; 06-27-2004 at 11:33 PM.
-
03-23-2004, 12:39 AM #95
a great back double bicep shot:
-
04-09-2004, 04:49 AM #96Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 807
Ronnie 1
-
04-09-2004, 04:51 AM #97Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2001
- Posts
- 807
Ronnie 2
-
04-09-2004, 12:38 PM #98Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 135
ok ok ...we have the 2 best here, so this will go on and on. my pic is Dorian, but the difference between the two is not that great.
-
04-13-2004, 10:26 PM #99LM1332 GuestOriginally Posted by gordero
-
04-14-2004, 09:01 AM #100Originally Posted by LM1332
In the picture, Dorian yates is "flexing" his "biceps." You can see them if you direct your attention to the large lumps on top of his arms, between his shoulders and his elbows.
Let me know if I can give you any more tips!
-
04-14-2004, 02:16 PM #101Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 135
Originally Posted by LM1332
-
04-14-2004, 07:24 PM #102
dorian all the way he has much better sym. and alot freakin harder hes genatic freak.
-
04-14-2004, 07:37 PM #103
Dorian!!!
Dorian by a mile....!!!
-
04-15-2004, 08:18 PM #104Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 135
Originally Posted by gordero
-
06-11-2004, 07:43 PM #105Banned
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Posts
- 272
i met both dorian and ronnie, dorian was a dick and im glad he got hurt, ronnie is a real nice guy met him at johnny latts.
-
06-11-2004, 07:53 PM #106Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 52
Gotta say Dorian is HUGE. A freak!
-
06-11-2004, 08:00 PM #107King of Supplements
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Location
- east coast
- Posts
- 5,239
Dorian should be a nice guy to the fans, but you can afford to be a d!ck too. What are fans gonna do beat him up. LOL. He could probably take on like 3 people at once.
-
06-11-2004, 08:44 PM #108
Ronnie hands down. Amazing BBer, amazing work ethic, and dedication. No competition for a few years. I think he will win 10 Sandows.
-
06-11-2004, 09:25 PM #109
i would say ronnie is way bigger than dorian but the abs on ronnie are sick.. it doesnt even look like he has any
-
06-11-2004, 10:18 PM #110
they both look like blocks. Give me dexter or lee priest or lee haney all the way.
-
06-13-2004, 08:19 AM #111
Compare
Here ya go. Now compare. BTW I didn't include Haney or Priest - it really didn't make sense too.
-
06-14-2004, 09:32 AM #112New Member
- Join Date
- Jun 2004
- Location
- Pimp
- Posts
- 8
Dorian ruled in his time. Ronnies back rules now!
-
06-14-2004, 11:52 AM #113Originally Posted by PJAY71
-
06-14-2004, 11:58 AM #114
I always appreciated Dorians hardness and quality. Ronnie is quite freaky tho.
Dorian in most shots has weaker rear delts and due to the huge lats overpowering the rows or whatever the hell he does to get that freakin huge.
I'd have to say Ronnie, but I like Dorian better.
actually after that pic for pic comparo
I'd have to say that Dorian is just as good if not better
Traps up top are not as big as Ronnies but Dorian has better "lower traps"
and his lower lats are not as flared
it could be the arm positioning tho
anyways wicked!Last edited by Dally; 06-14-2004 at 12:01 PM.
-
06-14-2004, 12:36 PM #115Originally Posted by chrisAdams
-
06-21-2004, 03:29 PM #116
GREAT thread Gordero.. NICE back comparison collage's Big Dude & PJay.. Each of them look better than the other in certain poses & it is VERY hard to choose who has the #1 back.. but if forced to answer, I would go w/ Yates..
Yates only flaw was upper pecs (bicep injury not included)
Coleman's only flaw is calves
Overall I think Coleman is better
-
06-21-2004, 05:00 PM #117
ronnie got some serious back
-
06-27-2004, 11:35 PM #118
found another back shot of Ronnie:
-
06-28-2004, 05:56 AM #119
From Gordero's pic alone. What I've noticed is that Ronnie has sooo much muscle - esp on his back, that it hangs and overlaps adjoining muscles. Which if you're not knowledgable, you'll mistake for fat. It's not a fan comment, it's the truth. We have to remember. Ronnie is handling [well too] poundage that no other pro lifts. Thus he's gonna build muscle that no one else has, muscle development that probably has not been seen on the pro level ever.
Last edited by PJAY71; 06-28-2004 at 06:03 AM.
-
06-28-2004, 10:10 AM #120Originally Posted by PJAY71
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS