-
12-17-2004, 12:11 PM #41
Anhydro
You're my new Hero
-
12-19-2004, 05:10 AM #42Originally Posted by Prime
-
12-19-2004, 11:43 AM #43
Dorian has a sick back...I agree...
-
01-10-2005, 01:01 PM #44Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 135
no. not ronnie, not anyone.
-
01-10-2005, 01:02 PM #45Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 135
yates still takes it.
-
01-16-2005, 01:18 PM #46
Ronnies lat spread is much bigger, if u see pics of im from last yr, his back was absolutely ridiculous, at the end of the day he is like 30 lbs heavier than yates eva was, so hes gonna b bigga in every possible way
-
03-25-2005, 02:04 PM #47
Yates Hands Down!
-
03-25-2005, 03:23 PM #48Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 135
Originally Posted by Kenny007
-
04-04-2005, 09:00 PM #49
yates is amazing...photoshoped or not.
priest does have a nice lower back.
-
04-07-2005, 03:35 PM #50Originally Posted by Prime
THERE CAN ONLY BE ONE ! Yates is the lat spread king, no doubt!!!!
Godspeed
-
04-07-2005, 03:49 PM #51Originally Posted by Anhydro78
What cycles do you prefere?
Godspeed
-
05-13-2005, 05:27 AM #52Associate Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Posts
- 358
If the first photo of Yates was untouched then I'd say he's winner hands down. But...when looking at the real photo in comparison with Ronnie...fuggedaboutit. Ronnie kicks Yates' ass. A bit more mass and much better cuts.
-
05-13-2005, 09:28 AM #53Originally Posted by Jase
why does that bother me?
-
05-13-2005, 10:05 AM #54
Yates owns, and blood and guts was a good movie.
-
05-15-2005, 02:38 AM #55
Yates, Ronnie, Franco Columbo and Lee Haney in this order IMO.
-
05-16-2005, 11:53 AM #56Originally Posted by Prime
unbeatable bro- no equals...
-
05-27-2005, 04:16 PM #57Associate Member
- Join Date
- May 2005
- Posts
- 286
biggest I have ever seen
-
06-01-2005, 07:23 AM #58Originally Posted by Prime
Last edited by S.P.G; 08-25-2005 at 07:05 AM.
-
06-04-2005, 10:34 PM #59
go dorian
i love dorian
-
06-05-2005, 06:44 AM #60
Ron
a few recent pics of rons back
-
06-05-2005, 06:53 AM #61
LoL
Yates back is $#%@!^ huge man, i wreckon jus a tad bigger than the ever impressive coleman. Also that pick of Lenda Murray is pretty hot aswell!
-
06-06-2005, 02:39 PM #62
I must be looking at a different Ronnie than you all because, as far as I can see, Ronnie Coleman whoops Yates as far as backs are concerned. I don't think that there has ever been a back that has the width of Ronnie in competitive bodybuilding. Ronnie also matches Yates for thickness. Ronnie also has AMAZING separation, he literally has muscle overlapping other muscles on his back, it looks like fat...
Everyone better recognize...
-
06-06-2005, 08:36 PM #63Originally Posted by scriptfactory
-
06-06-2005, 08:56 PM #64Originally Posted by scriptfactory
-
06-07-2005, 07:35 AM #65
what about that dude that almost died. I think his name was orvile burk. His lats where insane. Very high tie ins but the width was just ridicilous.
-
06-07-2005, 05:24 PM #66Originally Posted by johan
His lat insertions were a bit high but he had incredible width AND an amazingly small waist. My girlfriend said he looked like a comic book superhero. His proportions were unreal. If he had fixed a few key weak points and increased his back thickness he might have been a contender.
-
06-07-2005, 05:30 PM #67Originally Posted by ibiza69
-
06-07-2005, 07:12 PM #68Originally Posted by scriptfactory
-
08-11-2005, 02:15 PM #69New Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Location
- tampa fl
- Posts
- 3
big ron..."lights out"
-
08-11-2005, 09:52 PM #70
What the hell exercise are these guys doing to get that full?
-
08-11-2005, 09:57 PM #71Originally Posted by Anhydro78
Franco Columbu and dorian are my boys for the back! HUGE!!!
-
08-23-2005, 10:33 PM #72Originally Posted by Jase
Woah.. woah... I am confused here.. " big mate " ? Does that mean like, best friend.. or is there anymore meaning to that.. ?
-
08-25-2005, 07:08 AM #73
i just wached (ronnies, unbelievable) and (dorian yaets blood and guts) back to back and ronnie, kicks yates ass...HANDS DOWN...
Last edited by S.P.G; 08-25-2005 at 07:11 AM.
-
08-25-2005, 07:16 AM #74Originally Posted by Dally
-
08-25-2005, 08:30 AM #75Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2003
- Posts
- 90
Originally Posted by mkv213
-
08-29-2005, 08:01 AM #76New Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2005
- Posts
- 13
Originally Posted by ibiza69
still the biggest scariest back ever lol
-
12-23-2005, 12:12 AM #77
we all have our own opinions, but guys, you have to remember a few things
1) IGF-1. Ronnie has it, Dorian didn't
2) Yates actually dieted down. Ronnie is smooth all over his body by comparison. Yates had far tighter definition. A more appropriate comparison would be the Peter McGough-Yates B&W pics in Flex from way back when vs. Ronnie. That is all Ronnie does, he comes to town in the same condition as Yates was in 8 weeks out.
hence the higher weight.
-
12-23-2005, 01:25 AM #78Originally Posted by keth'naab
-
12-23-2005, 01:35 AM #79
i'm okay with you thinking that. Take a look at the hardness of Yates vs. the watery look of Ronnie. His chest looks tight, his posterior chain looks tight.
But he is nowhere near as hard or grainy as yates was.
Take a look at the condition of Yates in the B&W pics. Damn close to what ronnie shows up as these days.
not saying ronnie didn't look better at 268, or in 2003 O, he did
i'm talking recently. Ronnie did not gain 30 lbs of mass between 2003 and 2004. You'd have to be a fool to believe that.
Or not. But I have no idea what I'm talking about, so cool.
-
12-23-2005, 05:14 AM #80Originally Posted by keth'naab
The reason Dorian always looked grainy has a lot to do with the composition of his muscles, not so much his bodyfat percentage. There are many, many bodybuilders that can come to a competition with his same BF% and not look even close to as grainy as him.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
Yesterday, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS