Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. 07-28-2012, 10:01 AM #1
    Coolhand5599
    Coolhand5599 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    569

    PT-141 vs MelotontanII

    What is the difference between the two?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  2. 07-28-2012, 11:07 AM #2
    BigBadWolf's Avatar
    BigBadWolf
    BigBadWolf is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Alabama
    Posts
    966
    Quote Originally Posted by Coolhand5599
    What is the difference between the two?
    Google then read
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  3. 07-28-2012, 11:12 AM #3
    Coolhand5599
    Coolhand5599 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    569
    Quote Originally Posted by BigBadWolf View Post
    Google then read
    I did that, really don't see much of a difference, it sounds like MT II is more for tanning but that's the only difference I see. So I would like to hear from the people on this site that have used both.
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  4. 07-28-2012, 08:20 PM #4
    Coolhand5599
    Coolhand5599 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    569
    Does anyone have experience with both? Does pt-141 do more for libido than MT II?
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  5. 07-28-2012, 08:39 PM #5
    956Vette
    956Vette is offline AR-Elite Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    10,533
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Coolhand5599 View Post
    Does anyone have experience with both? Does pt-141 do more for libido than MT II?
    mg per mg they offer the equivalent aphrodisiac

    pt-141 targets less receptors than MT-II
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  6. 07-29-2012, 07:08 AM #6
    Coolhand5599
    Coolhand5599 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    569
    Quote Originally Posted by 956Vette View Post
    mg per mg they offer the equivalent aphrodisiac

    pt-141 targets less receptors than MT-II
    So would ou say, not much point it buying PT 141? Because MT 2 is better
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
  7. 07-29-2012, 10:28 AM #7
    956Vette
    956Vette is offline AR-Elite Hall of Famer
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    10,533
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Coolhand5599 View Post
    So would ou say, not much point it buying PT 141? Because MT 2 is better
    Would absolutely not say that

    Genetics/skin color would be a primary factor
    Reply With Quote Reply With Quote
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Forum Rules