-
09-25-2016, 12:43 PM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Posts
- 4
SARMs and Adderall
I just recently been hearing about SARMs and really do not know much about them. I plan on trying them out and want to read a bit more to see if their actually worth my time. I am also prescribed Adderall (stimulant) and want to know if SARMs interact at all with stimulants, as well as proper dosing and what SARMs to start off with or stack together. I am prescribed Vyvanse 70mg every morning and 15mg Adderall IR for afternoon. One of my main concerns is it SARMs effect blood pressure and heart rate.
-
09-25-2016, 06:17 PM #2
SARMS are fairly new still with little human research so we are still learning as we go.
It would be something that you would need to monitor closely.
-
09-29-2016, 01:34 AM #3
No. BP and heartrate should be fine. Only thing with sarms are cholestrol and supression.
I wouldnt worry to much about the cholestrol. As long as you eat healthy, sarms elevated cholestrol is not dangerous.
-
09-30-2016, 04:56 PM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Posts
- 4
What do you mean by suppression?
-
09-30-2016, 09:15 PM #5
Supression means they supress your testicles to produce testosterone , and there are no 100% way to know if they restart production.
This is particularly important for 20 year old guys like you, at this age your hormones and sex organs are finnishing maturing, interrupting it might cause permanent damage.
-
10-02-2016, 10:59 AM #6New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Posts
- 4
-
10-02-2016, 11:28 AM #7
You only hear that from ppl selling SARMs.
No point in using SARMs, rather use proven and well known steroids . Just not at your age.
-
10-02-2016, 12:05 PM #8New Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2016
- Posts
- 4
-
10-02-2016, 05:34 PM #9
More damaging at younger ages. If you don't believe that then you are spending too much time on youtube and not enough on real research. And this is coming from a guy who cycled in his teens.
Sarms are garbage. Your replies to BB show that you have't done much homework on them if you're trying to say that sarms being "selective" means that they aren't suppressive.
I read a thread a couple days ago about someone being suppressed from sarms... look it up using the search function.
-
10-02-2016, 05:45 PM #10Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2012
- Posts
- 583
I was nearly shut down after a very conservative ostarine cycle, SARMS are a waste man. Check my log for details
-
10-03-2016, 09:35 PM #11New Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2016
- Posts
- 3
Steroid related hair loss sucks.SARMS are more selective and a better option in this area as they may not affect the hairline whatsoever. Suppression isnt the only downside so the argument of "since theyre both suppressive just do steroids " is just an argument for people who either dont care about hair, or are lucky enough to not have to worry about MPB.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS