Results 1 to 35 of 35

Thread: Test overrated?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    3,435
    Quote Originally Posted by NATE0406 View Post
    with what? you think that test is more anabolic then deca or tren???
    It's not so much that's it's more anabolic than tren or deca it's that it's essentially a cycle all it's own. No other aas can really do that and allow the user to make good keepable gains. Both tren and deca really rely on test for libido and depression issues. Not to mention it's also way cheaper than most other aas.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Im A Pimp Named Slickback
    Posts
    3,090
    Quote Originally Posted by Blome View Post
    It's not so much that's it's more anabolic than tren or deca it's that it's essentially a cycle all it's own. No other aas can really do that and allow the user to make good keepable gains. Both tren and deca really rely on test for libido and depression issues. Not to mention it's also way cheaper than most other aas.
    yeah im not denying how great test is. i praised it in my earlier post. and like big said you wouldnt run a 19 nor without test. but there really is no fair way to compare test to anything else. the only reasonable way to compare them is by there profile. and if you go by profile alone then deca and tren "will hinder better gains" (not suggesting to run them without test). just talking theoredically.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •