Test overrated?

[Gears]

I understand why test is ran with other supressive roids, but compared to deca mg for mg, how different would the gains be. Or rather how would a cycle like:

Test-E 500mg/wk

Compare to

Test-E 250mg/wk
Deca 250mg/wk

I know what its uses are primarly for, but i`m probably going to run a cycle of test only just to see how my body reacts, and I want to know how it compares to other AAS (even if its just theory crafting single ran supressive AAS). I know the profile for tren claims its about 5 times more anabolic than test, so would that mean you would yeild almost 5 times the amount of mass, just for example, (I know thats not exactly the case since many other factors have to be considered, but you get my point). Also, it dosen`t compare to things like Deca.

I just want to know why some people think its overrated, and what the standard of expectations there are to even compare to, to even say its overrated.

[im83931]

I understand why test is ran with other supressive roids, but compared to deca mg for mg,

I think this is the basis for the question. Comparing MG for MG is problematic. In medicine this is never done, (unless the study is anotated by a drug company). Even drugs in the same class and subclass.
You can however make generalized statements that one drug is more pwerful than the other based on efficacy. While this may seem like semantics it is actually a very important point. Deca and tren are probably more powerful than test alone. However I wouldnt want to run deca or tren by itself because I like to have sex with my wife.