That would have been a civil issue, if they bought land under the turkish or british governments then they had the deed or whatever..

what I was talking about the basic facts of ethnic cleansing and an aphartied system-its a much more serious than a civil dispute not that you referred to anything specific..

and jews moved BACK to Palestine much like the christian crusaders did, their dogma being that they were 'reclaiming'

if you look at the other threads on this topic we were talking about how european jews originate in the caucausis, not the middle east-thats why they are caucasian people-duh, that simple fact is not in dispute.

but once they arrived in Palestine there agenda was to create a jewish state, which means non-jews, the indeginous arabs have no rights or are expelled . . they could have just been in Palestine like everywhere else they migrated and been "palestinians", but Palestinians can never be "Israeli" because of its religious connotation.

I mentioned this before- Jews migrated to S.Africa, Argentina, NewYork- no serious problems in those places-since they are S.Africans, Argentinians, and Americans; how would New Yorkers feel if they decided that NY should be a Jewish State, or that it should be segregated between jews and non-jews..

when is the world going to wake up and see zionism as the double standard fraud that it is?


Quote Originally Posted by crazy_rocks View Post
stick to the topic your jumping all over the place.

heres a fact for you elite person.

in the early 1900's when the jews were moving BACK to what use to be israel. they bought land from people and made it a nice place to live at again. once pretty and nice again the people who sold the land to the jews then claimed the jews stole it.

if your gonna tell the history dont leave out the cool stuff.

you have the right to your own opinion, not your own fact.

your turn!