So are you saying on a 36 month cycle the growth provided by AAS use will continue to get better as long as cals keep increasing over the 3 year period?
Obviously I'm being facetious on purpose to explain that there is a diminishing level of effectiveness with steroid cycles. Most will agree that tends to happen around week 8 or so...give or take. This has nothing to do with calories consumed.
By that theory, then why don't we recommend running the cycle for 12 weeks past when you start noticing gains?
The hormone goes to work almost immediately and your at peak levels within a short time. Just because we don't "notice good gains" or feel it "kick in" doesn't mean that it hasn't been effective for weeks already.
Don't get me wrong, I am not suggesting that everyone only run 6-8 week cycles of long estered steroids. I'm simply answering the OP's original question and pointing out that good gains can be made on short cycles and in fact, perhaps with less risk.
Yes it's possible, but running additional 2 or 3 weeks won't hurt.
- AustiniteThe longer the ester, the longer you can run it because of it's sustained potency. Ideal cycle lengths are as follows:
- Short esters (prop, ace, phenyl) - 8 to 10 weeks is plenty
- Long esters (Enan, cyp, hex) - 12 to 14 weeks is plenty
- Super long esters (deca, undeca) 12 to 16 weeks is plenty
Edit: forum is slow today
Last edited by DexterMorgan; 12-19-2013 at 11:05 PM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)