Too late to add Test E?????

[numbere]

No no no. Only with anavar, not any other oral. Tbol is more suppressive because it's derived from dbol, which is super harsh. But that wasn't a scientific standpoint because there is no science to show anavar will shut you down. ...

Anavar is NOT a mild compound where HPTA suppression/shutdown is concerned!!

[PT1982]

Anavar is NOT a mild compound where HPTA suppression/shutdown is concerned!!

So do you think a 12 week test e cycle would be easier to recover from than a 6 week anavar cycle? That's my point. I'm not saying it won't suppress. I'm saying test will completely shut down. 6 weeks of suppression will be easier to recover from than 12 weeks of shut down.

[numbere]

So do you think a 12 week test e cycle would be easier to recover from than a 6 week anavar cycle? That's my point. I'm not saying it won't suppress. I'm saying test will completely shut down. 6 weeks of suppression will be easier to recover from than 12 weeks of shut down.

I feel like you're taking this discussion in a different direction with your last post.

There are peer reviewed journals that show var is suppressive.

For the sake of conversation I won't hold specific words against you as I understand the broader point you're trying to convey.

Yes, I agree 6 weeks of var theoretically should be easier to recover from than 12 weeks.

However, I don't feel this is a valid argument because theoretically it should be easier to recover from 6 weeks of any AAS over 12 weeks.

[PT1982]

I feel like you're taking this discussion in a different direction with your last post.

There are peer reviewed journals that show var is suppressive.

For the sake of conversation I won't hold specific words against you as I understand the broader point you're trying to convey.

Yes, I agree 6 weeks of var theoretically should be easier to recover from than 12 weeks.

However, I don't feel this is a valid argument because theoretically it should be easier to recover from 6 weeks of any AAS over 12 weeks.

You posted an article from an ex member to discredit a point I was making. We can post article after article back and forth, but the point I am making to the OP is that he shouldn't add test at this point in his cycle. And the author of the article you posted is a personal friend of mine (in person, not online). He has much more research on that topic and he would say the same as I am. I'm not saying I'm right because I'm not the "know it all" type. I'm not saying I'm wrong. I wouldn't even give my opinion on any topic if I felt I was causing more harm than good. If I wasn't absolutely comfortable in giving advice, I would refrain from commenting at all. I'm also not one who's going to get into an arguement with a VET and risk getting banned just for giving a reasonable suggestion. I am not a parrot, but it seems the norm to be one in the Q&A section, even from people who've never even used the steroids being questioned. I don't get how someone can give advice (or why they would) about a substance they've never used. Anyways, no harm no foul. I hope I haven't rubbed you the wrong way, as that was not my intention. Nor was derailing this thread. Sorry about that OP. If I give bad advice, I do want it brought to my attention. But if I don't actually have experience in the topic being discussed, odds are I'm not going to post anyways. I'd never intentionally give bad advice. And I don't think I did here. Sorry if I came across as a dick. I really am not.