Winstrol - why its used for cutting and contest prep

[MuscleScience]

there are 100s of posts in the anabolics section of this forum. yet somehow i'm the only person thats ever been asked to back up what i say with medical studies and personal blood work. lol. come on. you've never asked that of anyone else have you.

am i the only person who has been asked by "staff" to back up everything i say with medical studies, personal blood work AND to send the staff a confirmation picture of myself holding a piece of paper with the date and the name of the staff on it.. if this is what i have to do to be here, then so should everyone else .

you know what, unlike other pussies that are on this board, that are afraid to run gear as an experiment , I will go get blood work now, take 100+ winstrol per day, and get blood work again 5 weeks later just to prove my cortisol levels have pretty much totally shut down.
theres tons of evidence out there confirming all of what i say. and i posted it simply to help you guys out!!
but fine, i have to prove every little word i say for some reason . so privatemdlabs is getting my $ yet again. sure i was planning on running inectible Dbol my next coming blast, but guess its going to be oil based winny instead.
oh yeah, ans the confirmation pics of myself that the staff asked me to send, i'll post those up as well (being thats the new policy around here, in order to chat on this board they need confirmation pics, they need to see your personal blood work , and they need everything you say to be backed up by medical studies)

I hate to burst anyone’s bubble, and I’ve said this on here before. We are not going to find peer reviewed double blind placebo RAndom control studies on non-medical use of AAS compounds. No university IRB board would ever approve such a study. Most of the none-medical use studies are retrospective and are typically based on surveys and self reporting by users. Sometimes there’s a case study here or there but nothing that’s on the order or what say Merck would do for say a male contraceptive study. Almost all out knowledge is anecdotal and second or third order evidence EXTRAPOLATED from legitimate medical studies when said compounds were developed for medical uses.

GH cannot completely prove his point with high power empirical evidence. But neither can anyone else disprove him out of hand with evidence either.
And Yes, the burden of proof lays on the claim holder so scrutiny is good. The best we can do is debate each other based on what evidence we do have and live with the consequences good or bad knowing there is never going to be a complete answer.

Well not until China and Russia release thier State Sponsored doping data