Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Trump Was Right. There WAS A Conspiracy…

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by The Deadlifting Dog View Post
    for the unbiased write up please see:

    https://time.com/magazine/us/?fbclid...%2F322page/319


    The handshake between business and labor was just one component of a vast, cross-partisan campaign to protect the election–an extraordinary shadow effort dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted. For more than a year, a loosely organized coalition of operatives scrambled to shore up America’s institutions as they came under simultaneous attack from a remorseless pandemic and an autocratically inclined President. Though much of this activity took place on the left, it was separate from the Biden campaign and crossed ideological lines, with crucial contributions by nonpartisan and conservative actors. The scenario the shadow campaigners were desperate to stop was not a Trump victory. It was an election so calamitous that no result could be discerned at all, a failure of the central act of democratic self-governance that has been a hallmark of America since its founding.


    Wow!!!!

    To think...
    A bipartisan group of folks trying to make sure the election was free and fair.

    What a scandal!!!!!


    Side note:
    Trump didn't claim their was a conspiracy.
    He claimed there was widespread voter fraud.
    He was wrong.
    And so was Q.
    Nobody that believes in a free and fair election would promote mail in voting with no signature or identity verification.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    Nobody that believes in a free and fair election would promote mail in voting with no signature or identity verification.
    The constitution leaves it up to the states to determine how to run their elections.

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by The Deadlifting Dog View Post
    The constitution leaves it up to the states to determine how to run their elections.
    My statement stands

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    My statement stands
    Well the professionals in every state choose their ways.
    And every single investigation by every single agency found no wide spread voter fraud.

    So it seems we all must've been very lucky this time that there wasn't wide spread fraud.
    Or...
    The professionals know more about election security than a millsmith.


    Side note:
    If there were to be wide spread fraud...
    My guess is that it would come from the political party that tried to overthrow democracy because their cult leader said to.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by The Deadlifting Dog View Post
    Well the professionals in every state choose their ways.
    And every single investigation by every single agency found no wide spread voter fraud.

    So it seems we all must've been very lucky this time that there wasn't wide spread fraud.
    Or...
    The professionals know more about election security than a millsmith.


    Side note:
    If there were to be wide spread fraud...
    My guess is that it would come from the political party that tried to overthrow democracy because their cult leader said to.
    "Overthrow democracy" is a bold statement.

    In a democracy, leaders making policy for the people they're supposed to represent, don't need to be protected by razor wire and armed militias. Because that's not a democracy.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    "Overthrow democracy" is a bold statement.

    In a democracy, leaders making policy for the people they're supposed to represent, don't need to be protected by razor wire and armed militias. Because that's not a democracy.
    Apparently they do when people unlawfully break into the capital building chanting about hanging the VP or should that be considered part of the process?

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by tarmyg View Post
    Apparently they do when people unlawfully break into the capital building chanting about hanging the VP or should that be considered part of the process?
    It was considered "part of free speech" by most of the media when it happened at the federal court house in Portland. Where they stormed the courthouse burned american flags, hung Trump dummies, while chanting "death to america"

    How was one different from the other?
    Last edited by Hughinn; 02-06-2021 at 05:12 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •