Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Trump Was Right. There WAS A Conspiracy…

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    My statement stands
    Well the professionals in every state choose their ways.
    And every single investigation by every single agency found no wide spread voter fraud.

    So it seems we all must've been very lucky this time that there wasn't wide spread fraud.
    Or...
    The professionals know more about election security than a millsmith.


    Side note:
    If there were to be wide spread fraud...
    My guess is that it would come from the political party that tried to overthrow democracy because their cult leader said to.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by The Deadlifting Dog View Post
    Well the professionals in every state choose their ways.
    And every single investigation by every single agency found no wide spread voter fraud.

    So it seems we all must've been very lucky this time that there wasn't wide spread fraud.
    Or...
    The professionals know more about election security than a millsmith.


    Side note:
    If there were to be wide spread fraud...
    My guess is that it would come from the political party that tried to overthrow democracy because their cult leader said to.
    "Overthrow democracy" is a bold statement.

    In a democracy, leaders making policy for the people they're supposed to represent, don't need to be protected by razor wire and armed militias. Because that's not a democracy.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    "Overthrow democracy" is a bold statement.

    In a democracy, leaders making policy for the people they're supposed to represent, don't need to be protected by razor wire and armed militias. Because that's not a democracy.
    Apparently they do when people unlawfully break into the capital building chanting about hanging the VP or should that be considered part of the process?

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by tarmyg View Post
    Apparently they do when people unlawfully break into the capital building chanting about hanging the VP or should that be considered part of the process?
    It was considered "part of free speech" by most of the media when it happened at the federal court house in Portland. Where they stormed the courthouse burned american flags, hung Trump dummies, while chanting "death to america"

    How was one different from the other?
    Last edited by Hughinn; 02-06-2021 at 05:12 AM.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    It was considered "part of free speech" by most of the media when it happened at the federal court house in Portland. Where they stormed the courthouse burned american flags, hung Trump dummies, while chanting "death to america"

    How was one different from the other?
    Not answering a question by asking another one. The worlds oldest trick. Good luck, wish you the best, genuinely.

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    How was one different from the other?
    This has been answered many times before on this forum.

    Both riots were wrong. Lock 'em up.

    However...
    The "Antifa" riots were mostly a loose group of criminals, Antifa, and random pissed off people making an attempt to bring about police reform and equal rights.

    The "Trump" riot was a group of Trumpettes led by the President of the United States of America making an attempt to overturn an election.

    So they are both fucking asshole criminals.
    The difference is in their intent.
    One was was for social reform.
    The other was to overthrow democracy. (Yes... overturning the election results is overthrowing democracy.)

    Note: I may have to save this onto an excel spreadsheet to "copy and paste" throughout this forum.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by The Deadlifting Dog View Post
    This has been answered many times before on this forum.

    Both riots were wrong. Lock 'em up.

    However...
    The "Antifa" riots were mostly a loose group of criminals, Antifa, and random pissed off people making an attempt to bring about police reform and equal rights.

    The "Trump" riot was a group of Trumpettes led by the President of the United States of America making an attempt to overturn an election.

    So they are both fucking asshole criminals.
    The difference is in their intent.
    One was was for social reform.
    The other was to overthrow democracy. (Yes... overturning the election results is overthrowing democracy.)

    Note: I may have to save this onto an excel spreadsheet to "copy and paste" throughout this forum.
    No sir, both of them had the same intent.

    To express disagreement with our national leadership and it's policy and Both hoped to affect the outcome of an election.

    The only difference was which leadership was being targeted.
    Last edited by Hughinn; 02-06-2021 at 08:28 AM.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    No sir, both of them had the same intent.

    To express disagreement with our national leadership. Both hoped to affect the outcome of an election.

    The only difference was which leadership was being targeted.
    Affecting an election before it happens is legal.
    Affecting an election after it happens is illegal.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •