Results 1 to 40 of 45

Thread: Aussie news: Leader of the free world is cognitively compromised

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by The Deadlifting Dog View Post
    He is saying a lie.

    Or a mistruth.

    Personally I think he knows it's a lie because the article he linked to prove his point directly disproves his point.

    Moral of the story: Always consider the source of info...
    Moral of the story, is that the actions are all the same. The policy is the same, and the politics go back to the same. It didn't work before, but Joe's going to do it again.

    Actually, Joe couldn't tell you who the current leaders of Iran even are. He's that senile. But his billionaires and elite handlers could. And they have alot more money to make by backing Iranian state run terrorism with one hand, and pretending to fight it with the other. Lots of excuses for wars and nation stealing ahead.

    So what if he doesn't say he's back in the deal formally? His actions show otherwise. Seeing what people do, as opposed to what they say. I realize that's a non democrat way of looking at it, but

    Thats the truth.
    Last edited by Hughinn; 02-21-2021 at 12:29 PM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    Moral of the story, is that the actions are all the same. The policy is the same, and the politics go back to the same.

    So what if he doesn't say he's back in the deal formally? His actions show otherwise. Seeing what people do, as opposed to what they say. I realize that's a non democrat way of looking at it, but

    Thats the truth.
    You were wrong! Admit it like a man and move on and stop whining. How hard can it be?

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by tarmyg View Post
    You were wrong! Admit it like a man and move on and stop whining. How hard can it be?
    I listened to idiots howling for the past four years that Donald Trump was "cozying up to fascist dictators"

    Now we have Beijing biden turning a blind eye to Chinese communist party genocides and human rights violations, and pacifying murderous Iranian dictators.

    And silence. You'd rather howl over semantics of actions without formal declarations. While denying that actions speak louder than words regarding intentions.

    Too funny.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    I listened to idiots howling for the past four years that Donald Trump was "cozying up to fascist dictators"

    Now we have Beijing biden turning a blind eye to Chinese communist party genocides and human rights violations, and pacifying murderous Iranian dictators.

    And silence. You'd rather howl over semantics of actions without formal declarations. While denying that actions speak louder than words regarding intentions.

    Too funny.
    To reiterate:

    You were wrong! Admit it like a man and move on and stop whining. How hard can it be?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by tarmyg View Post
    To reiterate:

    You were wrong! Admit it like a man and move on and stop whining. How hard can it be?
    To Reiterate:

    From the accociated press a few days ago,
    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration says it’s ready to join talks with Iran and world powers to discuss a return to the 2015 nuclear deal

    https://apnews.com/article/biden-ira...db0e0f74b62410

    If the bidens administrations stated objectives are to return to the deal, then what difference does it make what new label they put on it?
    The policy is the same. It's a return to same failed policy.



    Get over yourself. You know my point is valid, stop pretending like its not in such a childish manner as to try to argue semantics.

    Might as well just cover your ears and go. Lalalalala

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    6,946
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    To Reiterate:

    From the accociated press a few days ago,
    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration says it’s ready to join talks with Iran and world powers to discuss a return to the 2015 nuclear deal

    https://apnews.com/article/biden-ira...db0e0f74b62410

    If the bidens administrations stated objectives are to return to the deal, then what difference does it make what new label they put on it?
    The policy is the same. It's a return to same failed policy.



    Get over yourself. You know my point is valid, stop pretending like its not in such a childish manner as to try to argue semantics.

    Might as well just cover your ears and go. Lalalalala
    Again:

    You were wrong! Admit it like a man and move on and stop whining. How hard can it be?

  7. #7
    First you say....
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    Joe has... reinstated the Iran nuclear deal
    Then you say...
    Quote Originally Posted by Hughinn View Post
    To Reiterate:

    From the accociated press a few days ago,
    WASHINGTON (AP) — The Biden administration says it’s ready to join talks with Iran and world powers to discuss a return to the 2015 nuclear deal
    You obviously must know their is a difference between having reinstated the deal versus being ready to discuss a return to the deal.

    To give an example:
    Trump said he was going to build a wall and that Mexico would pay for it.
    That doesn't mean Trump actually finished the wall or that Mexico payed for it.

    Just because Biden said he is willing to join talks doesn't mean the deal will happen.

    Another example:
    Trump said many times over 4 years that in two weeks he was releasing his new health care plan.
    Even though Trump said many many times that in two weeks he was unveiling a new health care plan... He never actually did.

    Maybe you don't realize their is a difference between talk and actually going thru with your word.

    Long story short: You were caught lying again and you can't even admit it.


    You can talk trash respectfully all you want.
    But lying is not respectful.
    Last edited by The Deadlifting Dog; 02-21-2021 at 02:33 PM.

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by The Deadlifting Dog View Post
    First you say....


    Then you say...


    You obviously must know their is a difference between having reinstated the deal versus being ready to discuss a return to the deal.

    To give an example:
    Trump said he was going to build a wall and that Mexico would pay for it.
    That doesn't mean Trump actually finished the wall or that Mexico payed for it.

    Just because Biden said he is willing to join talks doesn't mean the deal will happen.

    Another example:
    Trump said many times over 4 years that in two weeks he was releasing his new health care plan.
    Even though Trump said many many times that in two weeks he was unveiling a new health care plan... He never actually did.

    Maybe you don't realize their is a difference between talk and actually going thru with your word.

    Long story short: You were caught lying again and you can't even admit it.


    You can talk trash respectfully all you want.
    But lying is not respectful.
    I don't see a difference when the biden administration policy is going back the days of the Iranian nuclear deal. Who cares what he calls it? It's a return to the same policy, and there's no way any "new" but not really "new" deal doesn't wind up being the same thing, or else better than the first (for iran) at this point.

    Pretending otherwise is simply making feeble excuses and hiding behind language.

    You throw around alot of names, and show alot of disrespect around here dog, moreso than most,, so don't talk to me about respect. Especially when the names you call out on a keyboard are ones you wouldn't call out face to face. I don't mind debating politics with you, but don't pretend like you deserve enough of my respect to lecture me. Especially When you won't do it in person. I've always shown respect for your point of view, even if I didn't agree. You do not extend that same courtesy here to anybodybut the moderators . So enough from you about respect. Stick to the issues.

    Returning to the same policy, is no different than returning to the deal, absent formal declaration or not. If Iran hasn't taken the offer yet, it's because they know they can do even better than getting the pacification and pallets of cash they got before.

    We've returned to the Iranian nuclear deal in practical operation. What difference is formal declaration going to make?
    Last edited by Hughinn; 02-21-2021 at 03:00 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •