Aussie news: Leader of the free world is cognitively compromised

[Hughinn]

First you say....


Then you say...


You obviously must know their is a difference between having reinstated the deal versus being ready to discuss a return to the deal.

To give an example:
Trump said he was going to build a wall and that Mexico would pay for it.
That doesn't mean Trump actually finished the wall or that Mexico payed for it.

Just because Biden said he is willing to join talks doesn't mean the deal will happen.

Another example:
Trump said many times over 4 years that in two weeks he was releasing his new health care plan.
Even though Trump said many many times that in two weeks he was unveiling a new health care plan... He never actually did.

Maybe you don't realize their is a difference between talk and actually going thru with your word.

Long story short: You were caught lying again and you can't even admit it.


You can talk trash respectfully all you want.
But lying is not respectful.

I don't see a difference when the biden administration policy is going back the days of the Iranian nuclear deal. Who cares what he calls it? It's a return to the same policy, and there's no way any "new" but not really "new" deal doesn't wind up being the same thing, or else better than the first (for iran) at this point.

Pretending otherwise is simply making feeble excuses and hiding behind language.

You throw around alot of names, and show alot of disrespect around here dog, moreso than most,, so don't talk to me about respect. Especially when the names you call out on a keyboard are ones you wouldn't call out face to face. I don't mind debating politics with you, but don't pretend like you deserve enough of my respect to lecture me. Especially When you won't do it in person. I've always shown respect for your point of view, even if I didn't agree. You do not extend that same courtesy here to anybodybut the moderators . So enough from you about respect. Stick to the issues.

Returning to the same policy, is no different than returning to the deal, absent formal declaration or not. If Iran hasn't taken the offer yet, it's because they know they can do even better than getting the pacification and pallets of cash they got before.

We've returned to the Iranian nuclear deal in practical operation. What difference is formal declaration going to make?

[The Deadlifting Dog]

I don't see a difference when the biden administration policy is going back the days of the Iranian nuclear deal. Who cares what he calls it? It's a return to the same policy, and there's no way any "new" but not really "new" deal doesn't wind up being the same thing, or else better than the first (for iran) at this point.

Pretending otherwise is simply making feeble excuses and hiding behind language.

You throw around alot of names, and show alot of disrespect around here dog, moreso than most,, so don't talk to me about respect. Especially when the names you call out on a keyboard are ones you wouldn't call out face to face. I don't mind debating politics with you, but don't pretend like you deserve enough of my respect to lecture me. Especially When you won't do it in person.

Returning to the same policy, is no different than returning to the deal, absent formal declaration or not. If Iran hasn't taken the offer yet, it's because they know they can do even better than getting the pacification and pallets of cash they got before.

We've returned to the Iranian nuclear deal in practical operation. What difference is formal declaration going to make?

Again...

You said Biden reinstated the deal.
Biden hasn't reinstated the deal.
Biden has said is his willing to join talks to possibly reinstate the deal.

So you lied.

Please stop lying on this board.

[Hughinn]

Again...

You said Biden reinstated the deal.
Biden hasn't reinstated the deal.
Biden has said is his willing to join talks to possibly reinstate the deal.

So you lied.

Please stop lying on this board.

See, you could say for example, that his policy is lining right up with reinstating the deal, and the actions of his administration reflect that. But he hasn't technically put a pen to paper yet.

And nobody could disagree.

And to say that he is, in practice, reinstating the policy of the Iranian deal, and nobody could disagree.

But, you choose to sling insults and call names. Because your trying to hide the point that biden is heading for another (of the same) disastrous Iranian deal.

Your name calling and insults are merely trying to deflect on the point. I've seen you operate like that time and time again. It doesn't bother me anymore, because face to face, you call me names, I'd knock your teeth out. But your objective here is not to get your teeth knocked out, its to deflect on the point, that joe biden is back on board with the failed policies of the Iranian nuclear deal. That's how you operate, and manipulate these political discussions.

Stop deflecting on the point. And stop with the insults unless you're prepared to do it in person. Otherwise, stick to the topic.

[The Deadlifting Dog]

See, you could say for example, that his policy is lining right up with reinstating the deal, and the actions of his administration reflect that. But he hasn't technically put a pen to paper yet.

And nobody could disagree.

And to say that he is, in practice, reinstating the policy of the Iranian deal, and nobody could disagree.

But, you choose to sling insults and call names. Because your trying to hide the point that biden is heading for another (of the same) disastrous Iranian deal.

Your name calling and insults are merely trying to deflect on the point. I've seen you operate like that time and time again. It doesn't bother me anymore, because face to face, you call me names, I'd knock your teeth out. But your objective here is not to get your teeth knocked out, its to deflect on the point, that joe biden is back on board with the failed policies of the Iranian nuclear deal. That's how you operate, and manipulate these political discussions.

Stop deflecting on the point. And stop with the insults unless you're prepared to do it in person. Otherwise, stick to the topic.

What insult or name did I call you in this thread?

You stated a lie.
I withheld myself from calling you a liar.

You stated that Biden had reinstated the deal.
That is an indisputable lie.

The point I am trying to make is that you lied.
I am not deflecting at all.

Now please don't try to deflect off of your obvious lie.

You may be right in that we may return to the deal.
But you are definitely wrong in saying that we have reinstated the deal.

And please stop the threats of violence.