Chauvin Juror Admits She Voted to Prevent Rioting, Not on the Facts

[Hughinn]

LOL, come on man, you weren’t brash. I was just f’n with you.

Seriously, this is just another one of these trials. It did have the potential to be a powder keg though because just like anything, the newer version has to be bigger and better. “Oh you thought the riots after the Rodney King verdict were bad, just wait and see these riots if Chauvin gets off, m-f’r!”.

Like this trial will do anything for anyone. It and the 20 million $ were nothing more than a temporary band-aid for race relations between blacks and whites. Cops still have to do their job (like they haven’t killed anyone doing so recently) and some will go overboard. Politics is ever present and won’t disappear.

The question though is why keep beating a dead horse? Are you thinking that one day someone will actually believe the horse is not really dead and simply needs to be beaten more to awaken it from its slumber? The horse is dead, it’s body is rotting and the flies have already come and gone. All that’s left is maggots & a stinking carcass that needs burying.

And I still can’t get that damn smart phone out of the pocket of my skinny jeans, lol.

It has to be called out for what it is.

There are those who read here and don't comment.
The reality has to be shown. Like it or not.

I have a PM box full of messages from members of this board who appreciate myself standing up to certain other members here who continually insult , bully and supress people who don't share thier views.

So I will persist sir.

[The Deadlifting Dog]

So, thank you beetle, once again for your diligence on recognition of reality, while most other forces seek to cloud it.

It has to be called out for what it is.

There are those who read here and don't comment.
The reality has to be shown. Like it or not.

I have a PM box full of messages from members of this board who appreciate myself standing up to certain other members here who continually insult , bully and supress people who don't share thier views.

So I will persist sir.

You're thanking Beetlegeuse for spreading lies and...
You accuse me of insulting by pointing out a lie.

Please explain how lying is good and being honest is bad???

[Hughinn]

You're thanking Beetlegeuse for spreading lies and...
You accuse me of insulting by pointing out a lie.

Please explain how lying is good and being honest is bad???

Like I said sir. Considering that many American citizens refused to serve on that jury for fear of thier lives from leftwing mobs, then I see it as entirely plausible that other Americans that did serve, voted to hang Chauvin to save themselves. High profile democrat leaders across the country were threatening violence if they didn't get the verdict they wanted. The militant sects of the democrat party openly made these threats, while democrat leaders made the same threats except slightly veiled. After seeing a summer of the democrat party militants burning cities, looting and murdering, while democrat leaders cheered them on and sheltered them from law and consequences, then there was no reason not to believe the threats were very real.

So yes, i find it totally believable that under such open threats and intimidation , that some people may have voted not on facts, but to save themselves and others from the violence threatened by the democrat party.

I have little doubt that as time passes others will come forward with similar confessions

[The Deadlifting Dog]

Like I said sir. Considering that many American citizens refused to serve on that jury for fear of thier lives from leftwing mobs, then I see it as entirely plausible that other Americans that did serve, voted to hang Chauvin to save themselves. High profile democrat leaders across the country were threatening violence if they didn't get the verdict they wanted. The militant sects of the democrat party openly made these threats, while democrat leaders made the same threats except slightly veiled. After seeing a summer of the democrat party militants burning cities, looting and murdering, then there was no reason not to believe the threats were very real.

So yes, i find it totally believable that under such open threats and intimidation , that some people may have voted not on facts, but to save themselves and others from the violence threatened by the democrat party.

I have little doubt that as time passes others will come forward with similar confessions

stop avoiding the facts...

Beetlegeuse stated...
Chauvin Juror Admits She Voted to Prevent Rioting, Not on the Facts

He then even quoted a particular alternate juror.
That juror didn't vote.

So he lied.

Just because maybe there is a possibility that perhaps there is a chance that another juror may have been affected doesn't mean shit to his statement about her in particular.

He presented a lie that an alternate juror who didn't vote did vote.
That is a lie.

You sir are simply avoiding facts and dealing in hypotheticals.

Please stick to the facts.

He lied.

[Hughinn]

stop avoiding the facts...

Beetlegeuse stated...
Chauvin Juror Admits She Voted to Prevent Rioting, Not on the Facts

He then even quoted a particular alternate juror.
That juror didn't vote.

So he lied.

Just because maybe there is a possibility that perhaps there is a chance that another juror may have been affected doesn't mean shit to his statement about her in particular.

He presented a lie that an alternate juror who didn't vote did vote.
That is a lie.

You sir are simply avoiding facts and dealing in hypotheticals.

Please stick to the facts.

He lied.

Sir, it's arbitrary nonsense that you keep pushing.

So beetles headline doesn't precisely fit the story he posted, and for that, you howl "liar, racist, sexist, misogynist, homophobe", etc etc, and therefore you seek to totally supress the point he was making by calling names, bullying and harassing anybody that comments or supports his point.

I digress, that although what your saying may be true, by that same token, cnn, msdnc,abc,CBS and all dnc propaganda outlets lie on a daily basis. By your own definition.
If you can be man enough to admit that, then I cannot argue your point. I won't. I see it, and its true. The headline is misleading. I am not arguing against that case.

But since you mentioned facts, I must point out, that with the threat of violence from the democrat party, added to the testimony of the alternative juror in beetles post in conjunction with the numerous potential jurors who refused to serve on the jury because of the threat of violence and destruction on behalf the democrat party, then it's totally rational and logical to believe that citizens that made the jury, at least in some number felt the same way. Thats totally reasonable and undeniably plausible.
And insulting beetle, myself or anyone else who holds that position, because you don't like it, doesn't change the hard logic behind it.

You go ahead and continue to sling insults and accusations, ignoring the sentiments and observations of others that disagree sir. Go right ahead if you must. Because I'm not going to argue your arbitrary point of a misleading headline. It doesn't change anything.

Justice was tainted because of the threat of violence and destruction on behalf of the democrat party. No amount of insults or bullying can hide that truth.