Biden administration allows Russia to build sanctioned pipeline.

[Hughinn]

In this report,

The Biden administration declined to sanction Russian interests in building a natural gas pipeline from Russia into Germany.

This pipeline was halted by the trump administration in 2019 but resumed immediately after biden took office.

What strikes me as the most insulting slap in the face is that the Biden administration and the democrat party shut down a lucrative American pipeline costing thousands of American jobs.

Then weeks later,, the same biden administration declines sanctions on a hostile foreign nation and allows them to build thier own : lucrative pipeline.

Left right or center. This looks like horseshit. You've got to also ask yourself just what the hell is this administration doing? Because on its face, this just doesn't make sense.

Here's the scoop.



https://t.co/2IhoXaGAeh?amp=1

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...to_the_us.html

https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/02/22...-and-congress/

As an American citizen, and moving globalist politics aside, why kill an American pipeline that met all regulatory standards and put thousands of Americans out of work, but allow a similar project to continue in Eurasia?
Does this make sense to anyone?

[tarmyg]

Do you ever train? So many boards focused only on politics but you chose an AAS board as your choice. I am curious as to why?

[Hughinn]

Do you ever train? So many boards focused only on politics but you chose an AAS board as your choice. I am curious as to why?

Because every single man here is an alpha, and most are B.M.Fers. I like that. This is truly a group of equals.

I like the company.

[The Deadlifting Dog]

Because every single man here is an alpha, and most are B.M.Fers. I like that. This is truly a group of equals.

I like the company.

white working people... They're slaves just like the rest.

So what is it... are you a slave or an alpha?

https://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-...ml#post7537956 post #67

[Hughinn]

So what is it... are you a slave or an alpha?

https://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-...ml#post7537956 post #67

Both.

[The Deadlifting Dog]

Both.

Calling yourself a slave by definition makes you a beta.

You are being forced to obey someone.

Quite the opposite of an alpha.

You can't be an alpha if you are completely subervient to a dominating influence.

I will hereby call you BetaBoy.

Perhaps you failed English. Very beta thing to do.



slave noun

Definition of slave (Entry 1 of 4)
1: a person held in servitude as the chattel of another
2: one that is completely subservient to a dominating influence
3: a device (such as the printer of a computer) that is directly responsive to another
4: DRUDGE, TOILER


or...


slave

a person who is the legal property of another and is forced to obey them.

[David LoPan]

I enjoy this site due to the lack of politics on this site. There are a lot of other places to go to post shit like this. I got sucked in last night to one of your threads.

[Hughinn]

I enjoy this site due to the lack of politics on this site. There are a lot of other places to go to post shit like this. I got sucked in last night to one of your threads.

Well, sorry you feel like that David. I always enjoy reading your perspective and opinions.

Unfortunately there are a few people here who consistently show disrespect and hostility toward people who don't share thier ideas, so it sometimes makes political discussion a little tense.

But it's all in good fun.

I hope you don't stop reading and commenting here. I like hearing different perspectives. Yours included.

[The Deadlifting Dog]

BetaBoy,

You are the one insisting you are a slave.

I am simply calling you what you claim to be.

"one that is completely subservient to a dominating influence"

or

"a person who is the legal property of another and is forced to obey them".

Since you are not the legal property of anyone then you must be the first definition.

I originally told you how offensive comparing yourself to a true slave is.
But you insist you are a slave. Subservient.
Do you like being dominated?

So instead of calling you a slave because I find that offensive...
I am calling you BetaBoy. Or perhaps BB for short.

Got it?
I am simply calling you what you claim to be.

#theLeftcanmocktoo #OrangeManBad

[Hughinn]

BetaBoy,

You are the one insisting you are a slave.

I am simply calling you what you claim to be.

"one that is completely subservient to a dominating influence"

or

"a person who is the legal property of another and is forced to obey them".

Since you are not the legal property of anyone then you must be the first definition.

I originally told you how offensive comparing yourself to a true slave is.
But you insist you are a slave. Subservient.
Do you like being dominated?

So instead of calling you a slave because I find that offensive...
I am calling you BetaBoy. Or perhaps BB for short.

Got it?
I am simply calling you what you claim to be.

#theLeftcanmocktoo #OrangeManBad

No, your trying to insult me, because you've lost a few debates and your frustrated because you've lost this one as well.

Go back and read my post. I admit, I am subject to serfdom by definition. Which is, undeniably a form of slavery.

It's an accurate statement to make. And unlike you, I haven't insulted anybody.

I've just admitted a reality. You, have turned it into an insult to deflect away from another lost debate.

You could just try to understand a different perspective. But so far, you won't. It's really all I'm trying to do. I've decided to ignore your insults, disrespect and hostility, and just keep trying to get you to understand a different perspective.

I'm not sure why. Maybe because deep down. I sorta like the deadliftdog.

[The Deadlifting Dog]

No, your trying to insult me, I am not insulting. You call yourself a slave. I am obliging your fantasy. because you've lost a few debates and your frustrated because you've lost this one as well. Claiming you win a debate or an election doesn't actually mean you won the debate or election.

Go back and read my post. I admit, I am subject to serfdom by definition. Which is, undeniably a form of slavery.

It's an accurate statement to make. And unlike you, I haven't insulted anybody.

I've just admitted a reality.

Stop your lies.

Your are not a serf.
You don't live in a serfdom.

serf
an agricultural laborer bound under the feudal system to work on his lord's estate.

serf·dom
the state of being a serf or feudal laborer.

BB... Do you just make stuff up to try to feel alpha?


repeat: I find it highly offensive that you compare yourself to a slave. I stated it in the original post. But you insist on calling yourself a slave.

Just so you know...
Slaves couldn't vote. Or retire. Slaves got whipped and raped.
You type freely on a computer and collect socialist Covid relief funds and one day will retire with social security and medicare.
So spare me the slave bull shit.

https://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-...ml#post7537956 post#68

[Hughinn]

Stop your lies.

Your are not a serf.
You don't live in a serfdom.

serf
an agricultural laborer bound under the feudal system to work on his lord's estate.

serf·dom
the state of being a serf or feudal laborer.

BB... Do you just make stuff up to try to feel alpha?


repeat: I find it highly offensive that you compare yourself to a slave. I stated it in the original post. But you insist on calling yourself a slave.





https://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-...ml#post7537956 post#68

The system of serfdom Edit
All land was owned by landowners - nobility, Church and monarchs. A serf is any peasant who has to do manual labor for someone else in order to get to keep his land. While most serfs were farmers, some serfs were craftsmen - like the village blacksmith, miller or innkeeper.

Taken from wikipedia.

Don't pretend like the evidence doesn't fit the definition.
Educate yourself my friend

[The Deadlifting Dog]

The system of serfdom Edit
All land was owned by landowners - nobility, Church and monarchs. In the US... all land is not owned by nobility, Church, and monarchs. A serf is any peasant who has to do manual labor for someone else in order to get to keep his land. While most serfs were farmers, some serfs were craftsmen - like the village blacksmith, miller or innkeeper.

Taken from wikipedia.

Don't pretend like the evidence doesn't fit the definition.
Educate yourself my friend

Stop it with your lying mouth BetaBoy.

Private individuals and corporations own about 60 percent of U.S. land while Federal, State, and local governments own the rest.

https://naldc.nal.usda.gov/download/...n%20the%20rest.

Are you seriously calling the United States of America a serfdom????


For anyone who thinks I am being harsh...
Is America a serfdom?

[Honkey_Kong]

Well Hughinn,

Back to your original post, this pipeline is being built from Russia to Germany, right? So, now you want Biden to be president of the world? This pipeline isn't going through America. It's not his business.

[Hughinn]

Well Hughinn,

Back to your original post, this pipeline is being built from Russia to Germany, right? So, now you want Biden to be president of the world? This pipeline isn't going through America. It's not his business.

I think you're making a good point there honky.

I can't argue against it.

But, I will digress, that Germany is also a member of the climate coalition, or whatever they call themselves.
And if s pipeline is too bad for the environment to be allowed to operate in america, to the point that it's worth putting thousands of american citizens out of work, then how is it not just as bad in europe?

And if the biden administration was truly against pipelines for the cause of saving the planet or whatever, then why allow this one to built at the benefit of a hostile foreign adversary, when it's arguably within his power to prevent it?

You've at least got to admit it's contradictory to his american policy regarding pipelines.

I guess, in my mind, if you're going to be against pipelines for environmental reasons, and feel they need to be shut down regardless of the pain and suffering it's cost american workers. Then why is it okay for this one to operate, at the cost of american industry?

This pipeline is sure to decrease or eliminate american has exports to germany, at the cost of texas gas producer's, and benefits russian ogliarchs.

[David LoPan]

Well Hughinn,

Back to your original post, this pipeline is being built from Russia to Germany, right? So, now you want Biden to be president of the world? This pipeline isn't going through America. It's not his business.

I am in the pipeline business and guess where I am applying for a job! But Germany is part of NATO and so it is somewhat of our business. Russia has large oil deposits and if you remember they got into with Saudi Arabia and crashed the oil prices, thus affecting the US.

When it comes to pipelines I am 100% for new ones, and I get lost on how someone could not want newer ones. I give this example a lot. I go out and fix lines put in from the '40s, 50's, 60,s and 70's, so do you think technology is better now or back then? Do you think we are much better at taking care of the environment then or now? What about corrosion technology? So would you rather drive a 70's pinto or a new car that doesn't explode when you get hit from behind? Always support new pipelines!

[Honkey_Kong]

I am in the pipeline business and guess where I am applying for a job! But Germany is part of NATO and so it is somewhat of our business. Russia has large oil deposits and if you remember they got into with Saudi Arabia and crashed the oil prices, thus affecting the US.

When it comes to pipelines I am 100% for new ones, and I get lost on how someone could not want newer ones. I give this example a lot. I go out and fix lines put in from the '40s, 50's, 60,s and 70's, so do you think technology is better now or back then? Do you think we are much better at taking care of the environment then or now? What about corrosion technology? So would you rather drive a 70's pinto or a new car that doesn't explode when you get hit from behind? Always support new pipelines!

What I meant by "it's not his business," was that Germany is outside his jurisdiction. And so that's the main reason he's not doing anything. I'm not even anti-drilling or anti-pipelining. I just understand his and his handler's position on the deal. They don't want to drill for oil and they want electric cars to be the thing (for whatever good or bad results that gives). Now as far as him not telling Merkel and Putin what to do goes, he doesn't have that power and he really shouldn't. I wouldn't want those turds telling America what to do either.

[The Deadlifting Dog]

Property taxes are the primary source of income for most local governments across the country. Your local government uses the real estate taxes that you pay for services like police protection, fire protection, sanitation, government programs, parks, roads and schools.

https://blog.lotnetwork.com/understa...0and%20schools.

You pay taxes on your land because you share in government programs that exist in your area.

Perhaps you want all those services free?
And yet you claim that you aren't a socialist.
Maybe join a communist nation.

[Hughinn]

Property taxes are the primary source of income for most local governments across the country. Your local government uses the real estate taxes that you pay for services like police protection, fire protection, sanitation, government programs, parks, roads and schools.

https://blog.lotnetwork.com/understa...0and%20schools.

You pay taxes on your land because you share in government programs that exist in your area.

Perhaps you want all those services free?
And yet you claim that you aren't a socialist.
Maybe join a communist nation.

So, you have to pay a separate entity for services you have no choice in participating in to keep your land, that your allowed to "own" by permission from those same entities?

Just like the serf's of past generations. Identically actually. Logically and in practice, it's literally the same.

You just made my point for me.

Lol.

Dude, your not good at this. Your college education didn't teach you reasoning or logic did it? You know WHAT to think very well. HOW to think....not so much. Thats the mark of a betaboy ain't it?

[The Deadlifting Dog]

So, you have to pay a separate entity for services you have no choice in participating in to keep your land.?

Just like the serf's of past generations. Identically actually.

You just made my point for me.

Lol.

Dude, your not good at this. Your college education didn't teach you reasoning or logic did it? You know WHAT to think very well. HOW to think....not so much. Thats the mark of a betaboy ain't it?

BetaBoy...

You claimed that in a serfdom "All land was owned by landowners - nobility, Church and monarchs." Your claim.
And now you claim "you have to pay a separate entity for services you have no choice in participating in to keep your land". Your claim.

How the fuck do you own land if you aren't nobility, Church, or a monarch? Remember... you are a slave. Your claim.

America is not a serfdom.
You can twist and turn it all you want.
But the fact of the matter is that America is not a serfdom.
And you are not a slave.

By the way: I guess you aren't pro-police. Guess they have to work for free under your system.

[Hughinn]

BetaBoy...

You claimed that in a serfdom "All land was owned by landowners - nobility, Church and monarchs." Your claim.
And now you claim "you have to pay a separate entity for services you have no choice in participating in to keep your land". Your claim.

How the fuck do you own land if you aren't nobility, Church, or a monarch? Remember... you are a slave. Your claim.

America is not a serfdom.
You can twist and turn it all you want.
But the fact of the matter is that America is not a serfdom.
And you are not a slave.

By the way: I guess you aren't pro-police. Guess they have to work for free under your system.

Simple.

If you have to pay someone to keep land that your supposed to own, then whomever collects payment for that land and has legal right to take it and evict you for non payment, is by definition the real owners of that land.

Substitute "Church" for government and then change "corporations" from nobility and the system is identical.

From top to bottom.

Cold, shrewd logic cannot deny it. And all your hysterics and insults (very betaboy behavior) won't change the truth in it.

[The Deadlifting Dog]

From wiki:
a serf could not abandon his lands without permission, nor did he possess a saleable title in them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdo...le%20in%20them.

You can leave America whenever you want. I hope you do.

You also have a saleable title.

America is not a serfdom. You are not a slave.


America was built upon the backs of countless slaves.
Just because you weren't born rich and need to pay taxes doesn't make you equal to them.

[Hughinn]

From wiki:
a serf could not abandon his lands without permission, nor did he possess a saleable title in them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdo...le%20in%20them.

You can leave America whenever you want. I hope you do.

You also have a saleable title.

America is not a serfdom. You are not a slave.


America was built upon the backs of countless slaves.
Just because you weren't born rich and need to pay taxes doesn't make you equal to them.

Leave America?

All governments operate under the same principle. You cannot leave america without permission. It's called a passport. All citizens leaving the country have to get permission.

You cannot enter another county without it's permission.

The only thing you can do without permission is abandon the land your supposed to own. But you still didn't escape. They simply rent it out to the next guy, and you pay again somewhere else.

American citizens simply get more concessions. Hence the right to collect some stake in the transfer of property you lived on. But you also have to pay for that in sale's taxes, and only with permission. The new "owner" is then by default liable for payment to the entity's that truly own it. Your more or less then rewarded by transferring ownership properly, only after payment of the levied fees are met.

You can deny it all you want. But you can't hide the reality of it.

I guess an ivy league education didn't give you the ability for objective reasoning. Is that beta?

All your liberal schooling and you just can't "win" a logical debate with man who types with callused hands.
That's gotta be beta.

[Hughinn]

From wiki:
a serf could not abandon his lands without permission, nor did he possess a saleable title in them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serfdo...le%20in%20them.

You can leave America whenever you want. I hope you do.

You also have a saleable title.

America is not a serfdom. You are not a slave.


America was built upon the backs of countless slaves.
Just because you weren't born rich and need to pay taxes doesn't make you equal to them.

So, they were a bunch of "betaboys" too?

You said so.

Your quote on the matter:

You are being forced to obey someone.

Quite the opposite of an alpha.

You can't be an alpha if you are completely subervient to a dominating influence.

I will hereby call you BetaBoy.


So your saying that the american slaves were all betaboys.

So are thier decendants aware of that? Because according to you, slaves are betaboys. So african american citizens, are decendants of betaboys.

I wonder what they'd think of your statement. I wonder what all those boogeymen white supremacists would think of your statement.

It's actually quite interesting.

[Cuz]

Lol this is pure entertainment

[The Deadlifting Dog]

Hughinn...

I will try to be civil. And simple.

I do not consider slaves beta.

Slaves were owned property.
They had no choice in the matter.
Legally they were possessions.

If they stepped out of line they were beaten, whipped, or worse.

Again... they had no choice.

If you want to consider yourself a possession then go right ahead.
Just know that I consider that a very beta attitude on life.

[Hughinn]

Hughinn...

I will try to be civil. And simple.

I do not consider slaves beta.

Slaves were owned property.
They had no choice in the matter.
Legally they were possessions.

If they stepped out of line they were beaten, whipped, or worse.

Again... they had no choice.

If you want to consider yourself a possession then go right ahead.
Just know that I consider that a very beta attitude on life.

But, they did have a choice. Saying they didn't isn't really the honest truth.

When you really think about it, the first and only real prerequisite requirement of slavery is the consent of the enslaved. Without it, slavery literally isn't possible.

You said:

You are being forced to obey someone.

Quite the opposite of an alpha.

You can't be an alpha if you are completely subervient to a dominating influence.


Consenting to that servitude, you said that made them betaboys.

It's all here in plain text sir. You can't deny it.

Don't backpedal on it now. It's an interesting thought.

Instead, please explain why you said it honestly, to satisfy my curiosity.

And I'll drop the subject.