View Poll Results: Who gets your vote????
- Voters
- 75. You may not vote on this poll
-
STILL Bush
39 52.00% -
STILL Kerry
28 37.33% -
Was Kerry now Bush
0 0% -
Was Bush now Kerry
4 5.33% -
Still undecided
4 5.33%
-
10-01-2004, 06:42 AM #41Originally Posted by Wrath
good point, but the fact that remains is that the middle class(which is majority of the voter) will continue yo get butt fukked on taxes then lets get 4 more years of it..hell you guys must like getting it in the ass.. bc bush will continue to **** the middle class-got to pay for war somehow?? ignorance is bliss people.
-
10-01-2004, 06:50 AM #42Originally Posted by Surferboy
-
10-01-2004, 06:51 AM #43
Kerry's getting my vote for now. He seemed to speak better than Bush and apperantly was much better prepared. With Bush struggling for words it didn't leave him a favorable light, imho. Look I don't have to like either one of these clowns, that's not what I want. I want someone who'll make the best deal for America. So far Kerry 1 Bush 0....and this one was about foreign policy. Bush is walking into a whirlwind when the debate moves to discussions over how matter's within America are being handled. Unemployment, healthcare, social security and such...........Kerry's got a lot of ammunition against Bush.......what he promised he'd do in to get into the office and and what he actually did will be hammered on by Kerry.
Of course all this is only an opinion of mine......................and I approve of this message. hahahahahahahaha
-
10-01-2004, 06:55 AM #44Originally Posted by Juggy Snout
-
10-01-2004, 07:01 AM #45Originally Posted by Surferboy
So if Bush is head strong and Belives it best we nuke North Korea and we end up lossing half the East coast from reprocussions as long as Bush is positive on his stance that's good enough for you?
As for speaking well.........when you sit down with leaders of other nations and you have a limited vocabulary do you think you'll garner much respect from them or get a good deal for your country?
-
10-01-2004, 07:08 AM #46Originally Posted by Juggy Snout
-
10-01-2004, 07:15 AM #47Originally Posted by hung-solo
I did catch that trans-shipment word there. I just chalked it up to has a slip-up on his part. I'm not interested in how he says something.......I'm interested in what he wants to do about something.
-
10-01-2004, 07:52 AM #48
personally, im not a Kerry nor Bush supporter......for America, are these really the best 2 candidates we have to lead our country?!?...but regardless, thats besides the point.......even, after the debate, neither one swayed me their way........Kerry will win New York anyways ......ill still vote 3rd party
( and throw away my vote) just to not become part of the statstic that young people dont vote..........but thruthfully, i must admit that it seemed like Kerry did put up a better fight this time.....Strength does not come from winning. Your struggles develop your strengths. When you go through hardships and decide not to surrender, THAT IS STRENGTH
-
10-01-2004, 07:57 AM #49
i think that these debates are alittle unfair. Most of it was bush explaining the things that he has done in the past couple of years and then Kerry attacks what he thinks Bush has done wrong and says how he would improve it. but seriously are there people out there who are actually on the fence so much that one debate can sway your vote
-
10-01-2004, 08:01 AM #50Originally Posted by Juggy Snout
-
10-01-2004, 08:03 AM #51Originally Posted by Danielle
wow, a voice of reason in a sea of political party brainlessness. bravo.
-
10-01-2004, 08:13 AM #52Originally Posted by Duck of Death
-
10-01-2004, 08:17 AM #53Originally Posted by Surferboy
-
10-01-2004, 08:26 AM #54Originally Posted by Juggy Snout
it is very clear that kerry is going for the "anti-war" votes, and bush will win the "pro-war" votes because of his beliefs, and the way he does things...
fukk unemployment, healthcare, and social security...thats gonna be the lowest on totem pole for kerry when he takes office and we get attacked again, or something bad happens...
Bush has held this country togather over the last 4 years, and had one of the toughest "rounds of presidency" with everything that has happened...thats why he get my vote...i wanna live to father my children...not die because someone drops a nuke on us, or actually invades us because kerry took away our right to bear arms while thousands of troops are overseas...we are to vulnerable right now for a chicken $hit to take office...give bush 4 more years and then we'll see what kerry can do...
-
10-01-2004, 08:30 AM #55Originally Posted by ColdStone
-
10-01-2004, 08:36 AM #56
sorry, it just seems amazing to me that a president that started a war over alleged wmd, has ignored a country that has said that they were going to develop wmd, and now has developed wmd.
-
10-01-2004, 08:56 AM #57Originally Posted by sin
-
10-01-2004, 08:57 AM #58
Cold, how do you figure Kerry will disarm americans? It's in the freakin consitution.....no one can rewrite that baby.
There's plenty he could do concerning the war....how bout pulling everyone back home and telling everyone to **** off? Of course that would never happen but there's always something else that can be done.
Healthcare, unemployment and such doesn't mean much to you? It matters a lot to me.....I enjoy eating and being about to afford healthcare and such. And we won't get attacked again bro, we have the Patriot Act now.
Of course Bush is holding it together...but only with string and bubblegum not to mention he got us in this mess in the first place. So he stays in office another four years.........and when he leaves and this problem still existes the next Rebulican to run will be able to finish it more so than a Democrate?
Btw, are you of Drafting age? Just curious and please don't take it that I'm trying to pick a fight, just an open discussion is all I'm doing bro.
-
10-01-2004, 09:00 AM #59Originally Posted by ColdStone
-
10-01-2004, 09:04 AM #60Originally Posted by Juggy Snout
by the way anyone heard of the backdoor draft thats in affect b/c of bush?? if not you better read up before you ship out guys.. spoken from a republican
-
10-01-2004, 09:05 AM #61Originally Posted by ColdStone
-
10-01-2004, 09:06 AM #62Originally Posted by Juggy Snout
-
10-01-2004, 09:28 AM #63
Arnie...
-
10-01-2004, 09:48 AM #64Originally Posted by Juggy Snout
Never did I say that if Bush decided to nuke North Korea, it would be ok with me. All I'm getting at is that I would rather have someone in office that believes in what they say and stand by that, instead of changing their mind everytime the political wind blows. Also, on the respect stance. Bush already has earned respect from other political leaders. It's not like he just came out of nowhere. He's the same person he has always been. And as I stated above, respect comes from what you do, not what you say. I would like to hear one thing that Kerry has said he would do, other than his "plan". He says if he's elected, he WILL stop terrorism. I heard this with my own two ears. The sh*t doesn't stack up much higher than that. Terrorism will always be around, it's just a matter of controlling it.
There is no owning here, just different views on the same subject. No hard feelings towards who disagrees, opinions are like azzholes, everyone has one and they all stink.
-
10-01-2004, 09:59 AM #65Originally Posted by Juggy Snout
I agree juggy. YOu are assuming WAY to much about what kerry will do and how brave GW has been. It's not like he is actually over there riding in the humvees and getting shot at...
I can assure you Bush would rethink some of his 'shoot em up, bang bang' tactics if you threw his as s in baghdad. It's like he playing the old -school game "battleship" using 21 year old folk who are in the reserves as pawns...so many folk here are military minded but I wonder what the percentage that have actually served? no trying to get under anyone ones skin so don't take it as that...
I think going into iraq had to be done...but BUsh is not doing it right. The iraqi people went from rejoicing that the US had arrived to throwing rocks at us. We have been in their country for more that a year and they are not seeing results. The army needs to have backed down and tried to have a summit with some iraqi leaders to try to help them help themselves by now man. Stop shooting and start talking man...these iraqi people have been opressed and you have to understand the psyche of people that have been through a living hell at the hands of a dictator...i'm guessing, in their eyes, they gave up one regime for another.
-
10-01-2004, 10:37 AM #66
kerry ripped bush a new @sshole
-
10-01-2004, 11:04 AM #67Originally Posted by Surferboy
Respect isn't something that you earn and then just aoutomaticaly keep. With some of his decisions he's made those view world leaders had about him have probably changed.
I'm not saying Kerry has all the answers....far from it. What I am saying is I'm ready for someone else to take the reins and see if they can do a better job. I'm just not too keen on letting things carry for another four more years as they are.
And by the way, for all you bros placing responces on this thread, thanks for keeping it civial.....exchanging opinions is always good when there's respect for other people's views.....even if they don't fit yours. So thanks
-
10-01-2004, 11:31 AM #68Originally Posted by Surferboy
-
10-01-2004, 01:04 PM #69
As a combat veteran, educator, union member, concerned citizen and never ending university student I cannot vote for Bush and I urge others not to vote for him either.
-
10-01-2004, 02:56 PM #70Originally Posted by jcstomper
-
10-01-2004, 03:14 PM #71Originally Posted by Surferboy
the did a poll with all of the countries in the world. asking who'd they would vote for. well 5% said bush and 95% said kerry
5% said they would vote for bush, hows that for respect?
now i know, your gonna say who cares the world doesnt get a vote. but do you really like it that 95% of the world will hate us even more with bush still in office? if you do your just lying to yourself to make you feel better
-
10-01-2004, 03:23 PM #72
just because Kerry is a better speaker means nothing at all. Hitler was an excellent speaker, and his ideas were awful. Bush has the right ideas, and he believes in what we are doing and that's why he is sticking with it. I think that you could tell Bush was pissed off in the debate because he knows Kerry is a douche and he can't just say that. Bush has other things to plan out - like running the most powerful nation in the world, not planning out what he is going to say in the debate to impress dumbasses who vote for the most charming candidate.
-
10-01-2004, 03:23 PM #73Originally Posted by jcstomper
-
10-01-2004, 03:29 PM #74Originally Posted by Superhuman
-
10-01-2004, 03:30 PM #75
It would be nice if the UN had a say in whom got elected. And forget this electorial vote system Popular vote is all that is needed. We can tally all votes from every precient much faster these days. That electorail college schtuff is from back in the horse ridding days. We have internet speed now. If you still want curriers to carry important secret ballot cards so be it. We have cars that are way faster than horses. Or you can send them out by truck freight. Either way, it would be a more accurate count.
-
10-01-2004, 03:31 PM #76Originally Posted by Superhuman
-
10-01-2004, 04:53 PM #77Originally Posted by 63190
-LH
-
10-01-2004, 05:14 PM #78Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2004
- Posts
- 96
Originally Posted by 63190
Nice f*ing logic.
chance
-
10-01-2004, 06:08 PM #79
Some of you left wing activists need to get a grip and see the complete picture here. Kerry is such a contradicting weasel looking sonofabitch, I don't see anyone who considers themself a human to go and vote for the guy. Let's all be realistic here. It was funny how Kerry even flip flopped in his OWN debate last night! He stated at first that Saddam Hussein was not a problem, Osama was. Then nearing 45 minutes into the debate, a question was asked, and he stated that Saddam WAS a threat. I mean, cmon folks. This guy couldn't be the president of HEINZ. Not only is he a flip flopper, but he is a poor excuse for a presidential candidate. Al Gore would be 1000000 times more suited for president than John Kerry would EVER be.(begin sarcasm) and I STILL wouldn't vote for either of them if someone had a gun to my head (end sarcasm). President Bush, as someone stated, HELD this country together after the MOST devastating attack on US soil. The man deserves a hell of a lot of credit for having the will and desire to hunt these scum bags down to the smallest hole in the ****tiest arab nation this world has seen. If you vote John Kerry, not only are you putting your lives in danger, but the lives of your loved ones. The man knows absolutely NOTHING about foreign policy or how to run a country during times of terror. One man has stepped up to the plate, and so far, has done a fine job while at it. Just because John Kerry had excellent articulation in his debate does NOT mean JACK ****. HOW THE HELL DO YOU THINK CON ARTISTS MAKE THEIR MONEY??? im done....
WAR JOHN KERRY CAN REMAIN SENATOR, AND AS FAR AS IM CONCERNED, HE CAN KEEP SUCKING THE KETCHUP FROM HIS WIFE'S KETCHUP BOTTLE.
-
10-01-2004, 06:41 PM #80Originally Posted by ColdStone
Just my .2
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS