Results 41 to 80 of 82
Thread: How Big Can You Get?
-
09-29-2006, 05:38 PM #41
thanks.
-
09-29-2006, 05:39 PM #42Originally Posted by IronReload04
-
09-29-2006, 05:41 PM #43Originally Posted by J.S.N.
It talked about wrist and ankle size predicting how big your muscles can get. or how much pound of muscle you can hold
-
09-29-2006, 05:43 PM #44
sure it's a general predictor but only that. so if you're naturally small and wanna get big there's no reason IMO to get discouraged- WWSD?
-
09-29-2006, 05:44 PM #45Originally Posted by J.S.N.
all these guys naturally small, i think they did just fine
-
09-29-2006, 05:46 PM #46Originally Posted by J.S.N.
More importantly, did Jay Cutler look like me before he started lifting? I did a google search and there is no before and after pics. For all I know, me and Jay Cutler are the same "frame" per se. See, that's where it gets confusing. Obviously, we don't have the same genes, and we don't have the same genetic limits nor the same features. Development of each athletes muscle structures differ. Someone always has a more prominent feature. But, where do I sit in the whole scheme of things? My lats are huge for my body frame. So are my triceps. They are both easy for me to develop. But, once you get to my wheels, I'm just stuck.
-
09-29-2006, 05:47 PM #47Originally Posted by IronReload04
I NEED THIS! Just for reference to see where I sit. Some scientist out there has had to figure it out by now. There has to be a way to tell by bone structure how big one can get.
-
09-29-2006, 05:47 PM #48
yeah that was exactly my point, esp. w/ flex wheeler. he has a small and narrow bone structure. i don't think anyone would have looked at him when he was like 12 and thought- i bet he'll weigh 250lbs. in 10 years.
-
09-29-2006, 05:48 PM #49
Not everyone has the same natural GH and testosterone production rate. So genetics really do matter...
-
09-29-2006, 05:51 PM #50Originally Posted by J.S.N.
-
09-29-2006, 05:51 PM #51Originally Posted by elvisinturn1
a "a thicker" looking bone structure and wider structure will probably most times out of 10 have more capacity for more size.
I wouldnt get discourage either way. If you set your mind to it, your gonna be jacked. as simple as that. and every athletes muscle structure is so unique, that its all good.
-
09-29-2006, 05:52 PM #52Originally Posted by rake922
-
09-29-2006, 05:53 PM #53Originally Posted by elvisinturn1
-
09-29-2006, 05:53 PM #54Originally Posted by IronReload04
-
09-29-2006, 05:56 PM #55
hang on, im goin on youtube, will be back
-
09-29-2006, 05:56 PM #56
coo'.
-
09-29-2006, 05:57 PM #57
i am gonna try and find this one video. its a comp, and they have levrone standing side by side with cutler, and you get to see every angle and every pose with those 2 right next to eachother. I am a huge levron fan, and i dont like culter past 2000, but cutler blows away levrone, i am gonna try and find it
-
09-29-2006, 05:59 PM #58
-
09-29-2006, 06:00 PM #59Originally Posted by IronReload04
My weight now is about 155. Back when I was on therapy and in the gym, it was around 180. I had a hard time buying clothes because I was big for my body type. Trying to find jeans was impossible. Trying to find shirts that would fit my arms without being so long that they were down to my knees was hard. I simply couldn't imagine what I'd look like at 200 lbs. It's just and I really don't think i could ever get that big.
-
09-29-2006, 06:09 PM #60
cutler's coiffure's so big he looks about 3 inches taller- what a stumpy piece of shit. short people creep me the eff out.
-
09-29-2006, 06:12 PM #61
What do you consider short???Tall people usually look goofySo it's all good..
-
09-29-2006, 06:13 PM #62
See how skinny Freeman's ankles look in this pick. They are TWICE as big as my ankles...
-
09-29-2006, 06:14 PM #63Originally Posted by elvisinturn1
2. How tall are you, cuz if you are over 5'7, you need to stop shopping at teeniebopper stores like abercrombie and fitch. if this is where you are shopping, then ya, some of those stores, i couldnt fit a a quadruppal xlllll shirt around my c**k. NO, thasts just not going to happen at 180Last edited by IronReload04; 09-29-2006 at 06:18 PM.
-
09-29-2006, 06:16 PM #64Originally Posted by J.S.N.
-
09-29-2006, 06:17 PM #65Originally Posted by elvisinturn1
-
09-29-2006, 06:19 PM #66Originally Posted by IronReload04
2. I'm 5'8 and I shop at Macy's, etc. Not the kids stores. To give you an idea, i couldn't find a polo shirt that fit right because my lats are so big for my body that it forced me into sizes that I would drowned in. The shirts were too long. I had to wear a 2XL Polo (Ralph Lauren) to fit my lats in, but the shirt was so long I couldn't wear the shirt outside of tucking it in.
-
09-29-2006, 06:20 PM #67Originally Posted by IronReload04
-
09-29-2006, 06:23 PM #68
My two easiest and biggest muscles are my lats and my tri's. I have huge lats that are very defined, and same goes for my triceps. Both of those muscle groups are very easy for me to "grow." I could easily just explode in upper body size with those two. It's like I don't even need to work them to maintain a defined large muscle. It's my main genetic feature. But, I have a hard time with chest and legs. Esepcially legs. Funny thing is my legs are strong as hell. Just don't have any mass.
-
09-29-2006, 06:23 PM #69
I don't see how at 180 you have to wear 2xl Ralph..I know some of his shirts fit big...I could fit in to some xl and all xxl at 230 at 5ft9..
-
09-29-2006, 06:24 PM #70
I'm half tempted to do a cycle of GH and test, and only work on my lower body until they catch up with my upper body... LOL. It's no good if I'm completely huge up top with no wheels. LOL
-
09-29-2006, 06:26 PM #71Originally Posted by Hackamaniac
-
09-29-2006, 06:26 PM #72Originally Posted by elvisinturn1
-
09-29-2006, 06:28 PM #73Originally Posted by elvisinturn1
-
09-29-2006, 06:30 PM #74Originally Posted by IronReload04
Only good thing about having chicken legs is that it makes my pee pee look bigger when I'm naked.
-
09-29-2006, 06:31 PM #75
I don't have anything that grows really fast..Except my stomach if i don't do cardio and eat well
-
09-29-2006, 06:36 PM #76Originally Posted by Hackamaniac
But i look like a chick on the leg press
-
09-29-2006, 07:30 PM #77
u could do the whole stack on lat pulldown weighing in at 180? how much was ur stack cause tht is surprising to say the least.
-
09-29-2006, 08:23 PM #78
Assuming he's doing legs and growth inorder to maximize groth potential there's really no way to tell,and if anyome says any different tell me who wins this years superbowl cause there's no way to tell,kinda seems like a foolish question,not to flame but seriously how could you possible determine that.
at some point the body doesn't want to grow any more at which pointGH applied if not already if health is not an issue then you see guys like dave palumbo with the wide gut baecaus he's trying to grow by eating as much as possible greg kovacks to.The body fights putting on muscle cause thousands of years of evolution tells us that we need fat to survive long winters that provide no live stock to hunt,that's why it's so hard to build muscle and so easy to absorb fat.Last edited by dedic8ed1; 09-29-2006 at 08:27 PM.
-
09-29-2006, 09:24 PM #79Originally Posted by elvisinturn1
**** genetics, keep growing!!!
-
09-29-2006, 09:59 PM #80
There is no mathematical equastion to figure out one's genetic maximum. Each person is different.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Expired dbol (blue hearts)
01-11-2025, 04:00 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS