Should Taxpayers pay for birth control

**DSM4Life** · 03-05-2009, 08:34 PM

Best birth control for a women

**Kratos** · 03-06-2009, 10:36 AM

Originally Posted by RuhlFreak55

here here....sterilize the mother****ers because they're morons....and they don't need to be passing those genes on anyway.....

natural selection has to come back.....whether it be by some sort of nuclear holocaust or socially instituted policies...i don't care just get the mutha back here

who's to say you would get chosen to breed?
If I were one of the judges looking at you about to reach humping age
hmmm...it's extrememly short, anti-social, red-necky, mal-content, has OCD, girls hate it, obese and fat at the same time, not open to new ideas, difficult to deal with, doesn't work.

Not sure I would pick your baby batter for the next generation...see where this can go.

The earth has been around a long time, and it will be around a lot longer. Diversity of human traits will ensure our survival. Natural selection will be back, maybe not for 1000 years, but nature knows what it's doing.

**J-Dogg** · 03-06-2009, 11:30 AM

Originally Posted by Kratos

who's to say you would get chosen to breed?
If I were one of the judges looking at you about to reach humping age
hmmm...it's extrememly short, anti-social, red-necky, mal-content, has OCD, girls hate it, obese and fat at the same time, not open to new ideas, difficult to deal with, doesn't work.

Not sure I would pick your baby batter for the next generation...see where this can go.

The earth has been around a long time, and it will be around a lot longer. Diversity of human traits will ensure our survival. Natural selection will be back, maybe not for 1000 years, but nature knows what it's doing.

I think I should get to choose. And girls can only breed with who I say.

Mostly me probably.

But I'm 28 with no kids, not sure if my swimmers are even working.

**SMCengineer** · 03-06-2009, 12:20 PM

I'm pretty sure not everyone agrees with eugenics or Margaret Sanger. So, no, it shouldn't be government funded. I don't really see how it's even a question, the government has no role in it.

**RuhlFreak55** · 03-06-2009, 01:07 PM

Originally Posted by Blome

I'm pretty sure not everyone agrees with eugenics or Margaret Sanger. So, no, it shouldn't be government funded. I don't really see how it's even a question, the government has no role in it.

of course i agree in theory....but with the government's hand so far up the asses of these people making the naught to do babies I'm ok with them doing something to rectify it so that our tax dollars don't go to so many unwed pathetic women with 5-6 kids

**SMCengineer** · 03-06-2009, 08:23 PM

Originally Posted by RuhlFreak55

of course i agree in theory....but with the government's hand so far up the asses of these people making the naught to do babies I'm ok with them doing something to rectify it so that our tax dollars don't go to so many unwed pathetic women with 5-6 kids

Government intervention inevitabily leads to more government intervention and thus more unintended consequences.