-
03-22-2009, 12:15 AM #81
there is a Movie on TCM called Capricorn one, its about how this was all a hoax, Its looks very interesting, going to watch it.
-
03-23-2009, 07:39 AM #82
BC, that movie was made in the late 70's... there were many that were on to the fake moon landing back then as much apparently had leaked out. I think that movie is about a fake mars landing or something like that.....If you really want to dig in, there is much, much information out there about this. Just about every astronaut in that project died and some of them there family died too...very ironic. Sme of the main ones who support and believe in the moon hoax were family members of those who were on the main project. but, needless to say, there are some good and some bad information on the net about this....
-
03-23-2009, 07:42 AM #83
-
03-23-2009, 10:21 AM #84
4 guys in suits and sunglasses came to the door this morning and told me to stop asking stupid questions...
-
03-23-2009, 11:41 AM #85
if u do some research it does start to look funny. the governent says that we "cant do it" physically right now. but how is it they were able to do it in 1969 with less technology? i didnt know til last year that we havent been to the moon supposedly in over 30 years..and that blew my mind i thought we went there all the time! They say the radiation or something would kill the men that would go up there, but i read somewhere that the metal/materials we have today are alot stronger/safer than what they had back in the 60s and some argue there would be no way a craft back then could have made it to the moon, especially if we cant even do it now!! does nobody else understand this?
-
03-23-2009, 12:10 PM #86
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aqlo_spATEM&eurl=
Don't forget the Soviet Union would love to have discreditied the moon landing. Bottom line is we were probably there. We spent the inflation adjusted = to 130 billion to get there. You'll have to wait until sometime in the 2020's to see if we make it back.
-
03-23-2009, 12:50 PM #87
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wdMvQ...eature=related
This one seems a bit more convincing. Im staring to lean towards the left.
-
03-23-2009, 01:27 PM #88
That's just silly, first of all you wouldn't use a wireman at all if you were going to fake it. You'd use a counterweight to simulate continuious lightness.
With all that money Nasa couldn't afford to paint the wire black or color in the light shimmer on film?
What you see on the pack is a antena less than a foot tall and that looks like a possible connection point. But it negates all of the close up footage where you can see the pack quite clearly, 5/6 weighlessness is just as noticable and it would be easy to make out any wire.
-
03-23-2009, 01:28 PM #89
-
03-23-2009, 01:33 PM #90
-
03-23-2009, 02:36 PM #91
you make a GOOD point Kratos. But when the guy fell down and got back up I was 'WTF'
I will have a look at the next 2 you have posted there.
-
03-23-2009, 03:03 PM #92
u know.... if there was oil on the moon, i think we would be there permanently. it could be our little space shuttle gas station pit stop.
-
03-23-2009, 03:03 PM #93
look at that footage again
more specifically look where his other arm is (not the one that leaves the ground making for the effect of him getting up without using any force)
it doesn't take much force to get up on the moon
where you think you see a wire, it's a result of film damage in the other shots combine with the gleam off the antena.
-
03-23-2009, 03:10 PM #94
400k people working on the Apollo program and nobody's talking
yeah right
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
Today, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS