Results 41 to 55 of 55
-
06-13-2013, 11:05 AM #41Originally Posted by basketballfan22
-
06-13-2013, 11:05 AM #42
-
06-13-2013, 11:07 AM #43
-
06-13-2013, 11:10 AM #44Originally Posted by basketballfan22
I think they've decided it's either shrinking, expanding or static. Leaning toward expanding because that basically makes it easier for us to make certain assumptions about gravity.
A static universe causes problems and we have to revert to the non used theory of special relativity to say that there is an 'ether' in the void to keep it all balanced. We just use the relativity theory for the current assumptions!
/I think/ this topic has always drawn my attention. The amount of times I've read Stephen Hawkings works and understood only 5% of it!
-
06-13-2013, 11:11 AM #45Originally Posted by basketballfan22
-
06-13-2013, 11:16 AM #46
Here you go man. It is not a scientific article, but a Google search provides many results (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metric_expansion_of_space). It is even more amazing that the expansion is accelerating though; so not only is it expanding, but it is expanding at a faster and faster rate.
-
06-13-2013, 11:16 AM #47
-
06-13-2013, 11:20 AM #48
-
06-13-2013, 11:30 AM #49
-
06-13-2013, 11:32 AM #50Originally Posted by basketballfan22
I still believe we're in a marble belonging to a teenage giant alien.
-
06-13-2013, 11:46 AM #51
not true. the bigger the universe gets, the emptier it becomes. it doesn't expand at a consistent mass density, but instead, the mass ratio approaches zero.
No need for infinity for the big rip. but it does require a repulsive force that dark energy, in theory, seems to exhibit. Or our understanding of C could be flawed, and we scrap E=MC2 and do a total rethink on our origins and our eventual demise.
-
06-13-2013, 11:48 AM #52Originally Posted by basketballfan22
-
06-13-2013, 11:52 AM #53
There is a quote in the movie "the shooter" with mark Walberg, between him and the gunsmith.
the old boy, tapping his head, said
"and when you think you got it right...
....you're wrong!"
We are an arrogant species, and like to think that we can find the ultimate answers. So we make certain assumptions, and like a house of cards, we build assumptions on top of other assumptions, until we have this whole construct that seems to explain things.
But if we pull one card out from the bottom, like our understanding on the limitations of C, then the whole thing comes crashing to the ground in a big mess, and we are left scratching our heads wondering how it all could have happened.
Then there are those in the scientific communities that have built entire careers in helping build this house of cards, and when someone comes along and questions the foundation, they are labeled a heretic, their theories attacked, and their findings are mocked.
Scientific truth comes very slowly, and is met with much resistance.
The bread crumbs are out there that could already topple our house of cards. No one is bold enough to begin to change the foundation.
-
06-13-2013, 11:56 AM #54
I was arguing with a few English friends of mine last summer in Uganda about the differences in the education systems. Personally, I prefer the American system as far as post-secondary educations goes (and I am not one of those arrogant Americans that think our shit doesn't stink). From what my English friends have told me, you guys don't put much emphasis on anything other than your speciality. I think it is great to learn about a variety of topics other than one's specific specialty or major. I also think it is great to have the flexibility of changing majors which requiring more years of schooling allows. It puts too much pressure on a kid to immediately start down a path they may not be sure is best for them. I am a big believer in knowledge in as many different areas as possible.
-
06-13-2013, 12:07 PM #55
There tends to be resistance to accepting new things in physics, but some resistance is good. It forces physicists and the like to be extremely accurate. You are correct about its being a slow process though. No one believed Einstein because he threatened what had been accepted for hundreds of years (the dude should have won multiple Noble Prizes, lol); but if we immediately accepted new things, we would adopt incorrect theories (see the neutrino discussion).
We are an extremely arrogant species, both collectively and individually. Very few people are willing (or even capable of) admitting their own flaws. Citizens like to believe their country is the best, and religions claim they are the one true religion. People claim we are superior to all other creatures on Earth, and even have the nerve to believe we are the most advanced life form in the entire Universe!
It is funny how few people recognize this.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS