-
05-17-2014, 02:01 PM #1
Hard evidence of life on Mars that NASA doesn’t want to discuss
I'm not commenting just yet. But here is the article:
UFO Sightings Daily revealed yesterday that the NASA Spirit Rover took a sequence of five images over an approximate seven day period that showed what appears to be an animal near a distinctive set of rocks. Two of the five images show an object that appears where other images in the sequence show nothing else was previously there. The object, about the same size as a basketball, had clearly moved, not once but several times in the sequence. The object appears to have a relatively long neck and blends in well with the surrounding rocks. The conclusion drawn by Scott Waring, owner of UFO Sightings Daily is startling. Spirit Rover had captured images of an indigenous form of Martian life that blends in well with the surrounding rocks.
The sequence of Spirit Rover images was first found three years ago by Waring. On May 14, 2014, he decided to post an update on his blog providing more detailed analysis of the moving object in the Spirit Rover images. Waring provided the chronological sequence of images that clearly show an object twice appearing where previously there was nothing there. No alteration of the images occurred which were all taken directly from the NASA JPL website created for storing Mars Rover imagery. Waring’s conclusion, is that the images reveal some kind of animal moving on the Mars surface.
It’s pretty hard to ignore NASA’s own imagery that clearly shows a basketball sized object appearing to move on the Martian surface. So why hasn’t NASA said anything about it? I thought I would give someone from NASA a chance to respond.
On May 15, 2014, I wrote a post on the NASA affiliated science forum, NASASpaceFlight.com, to get expert feedback about the sequence of Spirit Rover images. NASASpaceFlight.com was conceived by its owner, Chris Bergin, with the support of NASA spaceflight managers to give engineers from different national space programs a forum to share information about space missions. Here is what I wrote:
“There is a sequence of images by the Spirit Rover over an approximate week (Sol 1830-1836) that show a distinctive set of rocks. An object appears in the sequence. Some claim it is an indigenous form of life. I’d like some expert opinion on what it is. I’ve attached a composite of three images in the sequence which show the object (notation is by the life proponent). [see slide show for screenshot]”
My post was quickly removed by Bergin, and I was banned indefinitely from the forum [see slide show for screenshot]. The reason given was that the forum does not discuss UFOs, yet in my request for feedback about the Spirit Rover images, I did not mention UFOs or anything flying for that matter. Clearly, space experts do not want to discuss questions arising from NASA’s own scientific instruments that suggest possible life on Mars, let alone the existence of UFOs.
The five images from the Spirit Rover mission show an object that has clearly moved in the sequence. The object appears to be some kind of animal that blends in well with the surrounding rock. Given that NASA experts refuse to discuss such a possibility, it is reasonable to agree with Waring. Hard evidence has been found that there is some kind of indigenous life roaming the surface of Mars.
© Copyright 2014. Michael E. Salla, Ph.D.
Hard evidence of life on Mars that NASA doesn’t want to discuss - Honolulu exopolitics | Examiner.com
-
05-17-2014, 02:24 PM #2
Well if it is true that must be some extremely resilient life form. No atmosphere, a temperature range of -225 to plus 70, a moving radiation belt and no evidence of water or food source. I hope to live to see the day that theres proof of life on another planet
-
05-17-2014, 03:07 PM #3
Compared to our living, this "thing" would appear to be capable of living in crazy environments. I bet if they brought it here, all of our pollutants would kill it.
This is fascinating and creepy at the same time. Something else definitely exists out there. Just where exactly, who knows.
-
05-17-2014, 03:26 PM #4
Aliens
-
05-17-2014, 03:44 PM #5
there on steroids that why they can survive them conditions
-
05-17-2014, 04:52 PM #6
extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.
do any of you remember the alien faces built out of massive rocks on Mars? There were some ranting this is the smoking gun we were looking for to prove the existence of intelligent life in the universe.
Until we parked an orbital platform over the planet and took pictures of the thing and then realized it was illusions and shadows.
-
05-17-2014, 07:05 PM #7Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2014
- Posts
- 97
There is gotta be a life in there.. Underground?..
We live on earth to survive and they live in earth to survive..
Just because we came to this life this way does't mean they can't come to their lives their way..
Look beyond your walls and you will always expand your knowledge.. There are things out there you don't know about.. And things some people don't want you to know about!!
-
05-17-2014, 09:38 PM #8
what you are talking about is a leap of faith, an emotion. What I'm talking about is evidence. I've seen quite a bit in my time. Some interesting, some pure BS. Mostly on TV or in books. Very little direct experiences. So until I have a direct experience, or at least a substantial amount of credible second generation indirect experiences, to me it's still all just theory.
-
05-17-2014, 09:51 PM #9
Or was it? There has been pictures like this one before that NSA says are either photo shopped, shadows or just anomalies.
I think there are a lot of things they dont want us to know yet.. There are some pretty clear building on mars also if you know where to look and can not be explained off as shadows.
I think a lot of the TV shows and books are to give the public misdirection, to make it look like in the end it was nothing when in fact there is something.
-
05-18-2014, 09:48 AM #10
-
05-18-2014, 10:55 AM #11
Would proof of life elsewhere refute all of the worlds religion? I could see that as a motivation for government to keep extra terrestrial life a secret. Religion keeps billions people in check, following the rules and obeying law. Control would be lost
-
05-18-2014, 11:07 AM #12
Not this again..........
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/...98_634x339.jpg
Disclaimer-BG is presenting fictitious opinions and does in no way encourage nor condone the use of any illegal substances.
The information discussed is strictly for entertainment purposes only.
Everything was impossible until somebody did it!
I've got 99 problems......but my squat/dead ain't one !!
It doesnt matter how good looking she is, some where, some one is tired of her shit.
Light travels faster then sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.
Great place to start researching ! http://forums.steroid.com/anabolic-s...-database.html
-
05-18-2014, 09:23 PM #13
There are people so dependent on the idea of god and religion (similar to people in the movie the matrix) that they could not handle if there was life on other planets. Their whole world would be turned upside down. At this point only fact proves it but with the size of space and the universe being 14 billion years old its hard to think we are the only planet sustaining life.....
I dont believe in God and it doesnt keep me from being a good person.... Like voltaire said if there was no god it would be nessecary to invent him.Last edited by Rwy; 05-18-2014 at 09:27 PM.
-
05-18-2014, 09:26 PM #14
I dont believe there is life in our solar system but outside it I think so.....
-
05-18-2014, 10:20 PM #15
not in my opinion. But there are many in the religious community that would feel extremely intimidated. Keep in mind people were/are executed for transgressons like suggesting the world is round, the concepts of Darwinism, and that the Earth revolves around the sun.
For most, being devotedly religious also means a closed mind to other possibilities, not a very receptive state for new ideas.
Why not? Why couldn't there be microbial life on Europa? It has all the basic requirements for sustaining very basic life forms...........
-
05-18-2014, 10:45 PM #16
I dont understand what one thing has to do with the other? Those who are religious and think that life on another planet means there is not good are just being narrow minded. I have had this arguement with my mom and religous leaders when I was a teen. They hated talking to me about this stuff because I just kept asking them, you mean God couldn't do that? God has limitations? But you preach the opposite. They mostly are hypocrites.
You may want to re think that.
A new study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences finds that roughly 1 in 5 stars, like our own sun, have an Earth-like planet orbiting around it. That's about 40 billion planets that could support life in the Milky Way galaxy.
http://www.npr.org/2013/11/05/243281...d-support-lifeLast edited by lovbyts; 05-18-2014 at 10:48 PM.
-
05-18-2014, 10:55 PM #17
In my opinion life on another planet would not refute the existence of a god in the sense that there is an all seeing ever powerful creator etc but it would refute the stories that todays religions follow regarding the creation of our universe. Im talking about two things i know very very little about but modern religions are just very earth centric
-
05-18-2014, 11:01 PM #18
Remember that the documents/stories were written at a time when most of the population still though the world was flat. There was a limited understanding of the earth let alone the universe so you have to take what they said with a grain of salt. All in all what they say/think was WAY ahead of it's time even if not 100% accurate.
-
05-18-2014, 11:03 PM #19
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Location
- Big Trouble, Little China
- Posts
- 2,873
- Blog Entries
- 1
If they cant catch a big foot on earth how the heck will they get something on mars??
-
05-19-2014, 09:22 AM #20Originally Posted by lovbyts;6868586[B
The bible states their is no other intelligent life outside of Earth. There is no room for Aliens in their scripture. I am not agreeing or disagreeing. I am just stating how these people could not handle the truth of life on other planets because of what is stated in the bible. Obviously this will probably be interpreted differently depending on how extreme they are religiously.
There are people in Texas that think Global warming was created by Democrats and that GOD is the reason for the droughts. Younger people are trying to educate the older crowd but they refuse to believe it because of something the bible states. The ironic thing is that they want all the scientific proof in the world showing global warming is the cause but yet devote their whole life to something that isn't proven real.
You are talking about something bigger now in your last paragraph and I agree with that. I was stating my opinion on our solar system
-
05-19-2014, 09:45 AM #21
-
05-19-2014, 11:32 AM #22
i always thought this painting by davinci was very intriguing and in my opinion provides more insight and evidence about aliens than a lot of those videos and pictures out there. This was painting before the popularization of ufos, before mass information distribution, i think davincis motivation here would be to inform not to deceive, but thats purely my own speculation
-
05-19-2014, 11:38 AM #23
-
05-19-2014, 01:24 PM #24
could be many things but could be a rendition of something he seen in the sky, look at the man painted in the back ground looking up.
-
05-19-2014, 03:14 PM #25
I am wrong. It doesn't. This is what I was taught by my family and what I learned in sunday school as a child. Its been a long time since I read the bible and just assumed it was in there. I just went looking and now learned it is open for interpretation. I should have doubvle checked before posting. However I still think many people do believe this and would not be accepting if it ever happened...
-
05-19-2014, 04:26 PM #26
I don't even think it gets filed in the "possible UFO" file. too vague, way too open for interpretation. It could be anything and our minds try to fill in the cracks regarding things we don't know.
I think it's a flying elephant. Just because I haven't seen a flying elephant doesn't mean they don't exist, right?
-
05-19-2014, 04:27 PM #27
-
05-19-2014, 07:34 PM #28
Peyton Manning is part of the Illuminati...
-
05-20-2014, 12:11 AM #29
There always have been and will be people with narrow minds, that does not mean they are all like that. Most just dont have an open mind or more an understanding. It does say in the bible to not try to figure out God, his plan or the end times, just have faith but most Christians do the exact opposite. Ive called out several prechers on it over the years and they hate it but because of them being narrow minded or hypocrites does not mean I have to turn a blind eye or not have my own faith and understanding.
-
05-20-2014, 04:12 AM #30
-
05-20-2014, 09:54 AM #31
-
05-20-2014, 11:41 AM #32
-
06-14-2014, 07:37 PM #33
Stephan Hawkings believes that if there's intelligent life forms, then they're unlikely to be friendly. Interesting theory.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS