how long is too long to run a cycle?

**Liftnainez** · 05-11-2006, 07:24 PM

Originally Posted by brundle

I have to agree with MKRULIC. I gain really well up until 5-6 weeks (using test e and deca), then I hardly gain at all. I'm done with the 10-12 week cycles and I'm sticking with 6 weeks from now on. And I know it's not my diet

I think thats just YOU and MKRULIC.. but what can i say.. to each his own.. just doesnt make sense.. if your going to run a 4-6 week cycle why use test E and not test P.. im sorry you are wrong and i dont care what other thread you pull up to try an combat my statement..

**juiceboxxx** · 05-11-2006, 09:22 PM

4-6 week cycle of test e? give me a break!

thats just the timing that it will kick in.

**Liftnainez** · 05-11-2006, 09:24 PM

Originally Posted by juiceboxxx

4-6 week cycle of test e? give me a break!

thats just the timing that it will kick in.

Thank you.. thats what i have been trying to say the WHOLE time, but those 2 just dont get it... whatever..

**juiceboxxx** · 05-11-2006, 09:28 PM

Originally Posted by Liftnainez

Thank you.. thats what i have been trying to say the WHOLE time, but those 2 just dont get it... whatever..

Well you did your job to try to HELP them so if they dont want to seek or listen to PROPER advice then let them learn the hard way.

**Liftnainez** · 05-11-2006, 09:29 PM

Originally Posted by juiceboxxx

Well you did your job to try to HELP them so if they dont want to seek or listen to PROPER advice then let them learn the hard way.

Thanks bro.. Theres only so much I can do to help or advise but theres only so much one can do.. some people are just to damn obstinate..

**marcus300** · 05-12-2006, 01:41 AM

Originally Posted by Liftnainez

I think thats just YOU and MKRULIC.. but what can i say.. to each his own.. just doesnt make sense.. if your going to run a 4-6 week cycle why use test E and not test P.. im sorry you are wrong and i dont care what other thread you pull up to try an combat my statement..

You can run long esters in short cycles with the exactly same effect, it all depends on how much mg you injecting on how effective it will be, obviously its going to be run high for good effect tho,

With what i call standard short cycles you would be better of using faster acting compounds, this is a far better option than long ester's at a normal dose.

**Kale** · 05-12-2006, 01:46 AM

Originally Posted by marcus300

You can run long esters in short cycles with the exactly same effect, it all depends on how much mg you injecting on how effective it will be, obviously its going to be run high for good effect tho,

With what i call standard short cycles you would be better of using faster acting compounds, this is a far better option than long ester's at a normal dose.

Lets see what kind of smart ass reply this generates Marcus

**marcus300** · 05-12-2006, 01:48 AM

Originally Posted by Kale

Lets see what kind of smart ass reply this generates Marcus

**mkrulic** · 05-12-2006, 06:41 PM

Originally Posted by Liftnainez

im sorry you are wrong and i dont care what other thread you pull up to try an combat my statement..

That's laughable. you'll find that people react differently to different hormones. How you react is how you react. Its not lying or wrong. it just is what it is. what would my motovation for lying be? your very loose in your words. you would have been more accurate to say, "I dont understand how,...", or, "I think it would be better like this..." If you would have stated it that way you would have gained enlightenment about hormones. I could have given you a reason why that might have changed the way you look at steroid use .
post script:
you cannont put any water in a glass thats full.

**Liftnainez** · 05-12-2006, 07:31 PM

bro drop it.. Im not changing my opinion.. fast acting compounds are better used for shorter cycles.. if you want to teach people how to speak go elsewhere.. thanks torti