Thread: mg for mg winny or mast
-
05-19-2008, 10:27 PM #1Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Your little sister
- Posts
- 1,129
mg for mg winny or mast
im 236lbs and 14% is mast or winny more useful for me to use as a cutting hardener at my size mg for mg
-
05-19-2008, 10:29 PM #2
i like winny but ive heard great things about mast..what kind of cylce to you want to run?
-
05-19-2008, 10:43 PM #3Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Your little sister
- Posts
- 1,129
100 mg/ed prop
100mg/eod either mast or winny. looking to cut a few % pts of bf and gain a few lbs.
-
05-19-2008, 10:46 PM #4
from my exp i like winny. but i have never used mast. from what i hear you would like mast more for that cycle. maybe someone else will chime in with exp with both.
-
05-19-2008, 10:47 PM #5
Dam bro this is a hard one to choose! If it came down to it i would prob. go with the winnie. Just because ive had such great results with it when ran with test and a clean diet
-
05-19-2008, 10:54 PM #6Associate Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2006
- Posts
- 413
winny
-
05-19-2008, 11:07 PM #7Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Your little sister
- Posts
- 1,129
I was looking to use masteron because of its similar effects to winny and its lower toxicity. if mg for mg they'd both work the same then id use mast for that reason. also cause I wouldn't have to run anything to keep the bloat down
-
05-19-2008, 11:23 PM #8Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Your little sister
- Posts
- 1,129
what do u guys think of my theory?
-
05-19-2008, 11:48 PM #9Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Your little sister
- Posts
- 1,129
not much I guess, lol
-
05-19-2008, 11:57 PM #10Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2004
- Posts
- 70
I've found mast far better than winny
-
05-20-2008, 12:27 AM #11
I LOVE mast, but mg/mg winny is far better. again that is mg/mg winny is definately stronger
-
05-20-2008, 12:47 AM #12Senior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2005
- Location
- Your little sister
- Posts
- 1,129
I actually agree but if I can safely run mast far longer than winny then I may get better results right? I've run winny and liked it but my liver values were shitty and I knew that if I could have run it longer I wouldve gotten better results. Will mast run at say 750mg to 1 gram/week for 8-10 weeks do me better than winny at 550-700mg/week for 6 weeks? I feel like it would and have less effect on my liver even if its run longer. any thoughts?
-
05-20-2008, 12:59 AM #13
Winny or Mast aren't gonna help you cut the fat, they just work wonders when you have an already existing low bodyfat.
Iìd suggest to cut before stick to those compounds, they'll give you an harder appearance.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS