Results 81 to 120 of 132
Thread: VETS: Bulker Cycle Critique
-
07-01-2009, 09:20 PM #81Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
-
07-01-2009, 09:20 PM #82
you know guys, i'm gonna have to review the thread in detail to see if i'm missing something, but i think this thread's epic fail is on all of us, yes we gave our honest opinion to seriousmass, and he shouldn't have been so defensive, but i understand why he got that way, it's hard having people that you respect tell you that your entire way of training/dieting/etc... is wrong without ever having met you
alot of names were thrown and those things can't be taken back, but we're all adults here and we can forgive and forget
so to all my friends i say to take a step back and look over this thread again from an open perspective, if your opinion stays the same so be it but i think that we owe it to each other and this board to at least give this thread and our own words a second look
-
07-01-2009, 09:21 PM #83Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
-
07-01-2009, 09:25 PM #84Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
I'm going out for the night. I'll check back later on tonight.
Once again, chuckt12345 POST UP SOME PICS. You little pinner-b*tch.
I can see you looking at this thread through "currently active users"... I'm calling you out, because I know you're a chump, b*tch.
-
07-01-2009, 09:26 PM #85
waittttttttttttt
-
07-01-2009, 09:27 PM #86
-
07-01-2009, 09:28 PM #87
I think many of us just want you to justify why you flame others that do are not theage/bad diet/lift wrong
When you are not old enough, you are tiny, you whould not be cycling....
Do you consider youself a hypocrite?
-
07-01-2009, 09:29 PM #88
-
07-01-2009, 09:33 PM #89
Chuck I like you, you don't flame, but you don't listen to these BS troll's stories and call them out. I usually don't call them out because they are so full of it anyone that has been around can figure it out for themselves. But on calling out the BS I think this is good for the newbs who don't know any better.
-
07-01-2009, 09:36 PM #90
I am not going to flame you bro and no we are not friends check you profile deleted you yesterday due to your actions the other night. I was not rude to you in my question so your response was un called for. I am sorry it just did not make sense to me.
But if that is your cycle history you do need to step back and let your body recover before going into another cycle. You are young and have a nice frame to build from and will do as you get older..IMO
I will not post in this thread again so
good luck
peace
I had to add this after think about it and reading and talking to dancer's post 92..
If this thread is not deleted then kids under the age of 22 will read this and could cause serious damage to their bodies and sex life.
There is a lot of dangers in using steroids at a young age bone fusion and libedo, just to name a few...
just my two cents...
proneLast edited by *RAGE*; 07-01-2009 at 10:25 PM.
-
07-01-2009, 09:41 PM #91
The problem here is the principle of the thread. If a mod/vet suggests to a new member to "go research" and they read this thread, does this thread serve the pright purpose?
If a 20 year-old reads this and thinks well he is using aas so it must be ok, that member is correct BECAUSE this kinda of action is not condemned in any strong terms.
No mod or vet flamed Seriousmass here, but I for one think that he should be held to the same standard that the mods and vets here and other places hold other members!
-
07-01-2009, 10:08 PM #92
its little kids like u that i just hate. you have been training for what 3-4 years, ur a little boy to me bro, and ur the self proclaimed guru, it really is sad that u dont see it...
and regarding phate, i kiss know ones ass on here, i actually took the time to read alot of his shit cause i knew he never cycled, and the kid is spot on bro...and a hell of a nice guy...
bodyfat shot up due to car accident....was on sidelines....but believe me, diet dialed in, and cranking cardio...
some people are such losers
-
07-01-2009, 10:36 PM #93Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
I just smoked. I'm much calmer. lol. I'll give this another go... but politely this time... for you.
And thanks for not locking this thread. I owe you 2 favours now hey? lol.
Dancer, I do not have a bad diet whatsoever. My training protocol is very well-rounded. And I never tell people not to cycle due to age. Check my posts. So no, I don't consider myself a hypocrite. If you saw how skinny I was 7 months ago, compared to now, you would be shocked. Now is that a good thing - NO. I definitely deserved to be flamed, no doubt. I was 170 and cycling. Now is a completely different situation though. In just over 6 months I peaked my weight at over 200 pounds. I've retained a massive amount of that. IMO, cycling at age 20 was one of my best decisions, it literally changed my life. If you're actually interested in why.. or whatever.. just PM me and i'll tell you all about it.
I don't know if i'm misinterpreting this post. But Chuck is a b*tch. He thinks he knows everything, when really his knowledge is extremely limited. I like how he convinced everyone I was 170 pounds. hah. And convinced everyone I lied. He should learn to mind his own business.
Prone, that's fine about deleting me from your friends. I never really targeted you at all this past week... but ok. It's all good bro.
Just so you know, I am recovering right now. I'm done my prop/halo cycle, and I'm now finished PCT. I'm going to be recovering until basically September 1st... so still two more months to go. I get my bloodwork done every 1.5 months, so I'm really in touch with my body. Thank you for your concern though..
You're a loser bro. I f*cking hate your guts. Peace.
Last edited by seriousmass; 07-01-2009 at 10:42 PM.
-
07-01-2009, 10:39 PM #94Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
Bro. You need to look at my original post. I WAS ASKING FOR HELP. I wanted people to look at my cycle, and help me out.
I was not looking to prove all of you guys wrong. You just all listened to that lying f*cker ChuckT... and as a result, created all this drama.
I didn't want to talk about my previous cycles, because I didn't want people to assume cruising is ok. I've already stated this 3 or 4 times.
-
07-01-2009, 10:47 PM #95Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
Now, I'll ask again, politely.
Does anyone have any advice for the cycle I proposed;
I could really use some help tweaking it.
-
07-01-2009, 10:49 PM #96Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
-
07-01-2009, 10:52 PM #97
If your serious, then Thank you , and those are pre cycle, so I am actually bigger now and a lot wider and thicker at 260. but I didn't touch a steroid until I was 35
-
07-01-2009, 10:53 PM #98
at 196 u should be huge and considering ur upper body is not too thick i.e chest and back...ur legs must be MASSIVE as **** for u to weigh that much
none the less...the only thing i can say to this thread is take a step back and read what you wrote..it honestly sounds like an immature child yelling at his parents because he did not get what he wanted...
i think a big part of using steroids is related to muscle maturity, but i think an even bigger part is related to psychological maturity. If you handle yourself in that manner over an internet forum, i question your ability to handle yourself in other situations where a drug may have an impact on your mental state. A mature man in his 20's would never respond to people in such a manner, swearing and criticizing. Its disappointing to see something like this as i have seen you post on this forum and have respected you.
I think you need to take a moment and do some cleaning up quickly, and use this as a lesson on how not to act.
-
07-01-2009, 10:56 PM #99Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
lol.. yah I was being serious. really thick upper back. That's basically the look I'm going for - I think I have really well developed shoulders, and I think my back is alright... but it's just my chest thats lagging terribly. I can't seem to build it properly / proportionately.
That's very admirable that you didn't juice till then. All my friends began when we were 15 / 16 years old.. so I thought I avoided the urge for quite a while..
-
07-01-2009, 10:58 PM #100
I think the thickness comes with the age. Can't short cut muscle maturity.
I keep saying, bodybuilding is a Marathon, not a sprint. Your thickness will come !!
Just start eating like I did....every two hours. two steaks a day.... it works
-
07-01-2009, 11:00 PM #101Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
Bro, I'm 6'2.... 196 is pretty deceiving on someone my height don't you think? and I don't think my upper body is particularly small at all...
Anyways, I do agree with you.. I went a little nuts there. Generally, my posts are very benign and friendly though. I am just tired of having to prove myself on here.
-
07-01-2009, 11:05 PM #102Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
I eat my 8 meals a day. I don't drink. I attend university & work concurrently.
I worked my a*s off to get where I'm at. each and everyday man. I did not just rely on the steroids to do all the work. (I know that's not what you're saying, i just wanted to mention it )
I hope to god muscle maturity will still develop properly on me (after all the AAS i've put into myself). I often think about what my body will look like in the future.. that's why after this next cycle, I'm stopping for good. I just need to hit my goal of 220. and i'm done.
-
07-01-2009, 11:10 PM #103
NO offense, but I call BS on that statement......LOLOLOLOL in a good way.....
lets see, I said that at 225, then at 225 i thought gee, 240 sounds good....then at 240, hell 250 isn't that far......then this cycle I got to almost 280 and thought DAMNNNNN......I bet I can break 300 by next spring......
Trust me.....you will never be satisfied with whatever weight or goal you reach....that is what keeps us going......we are driven
I would just like to see you give your body a GOOD break and only do one or two cycles a year.........
-
07-01-2009, 11:15 PM #104Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
That's the plan from now on.
My plan is to cycle from September - December 09... and then I'll be off AAS from January 2010 - September 2010. ( I'm going to be moving to a very, very, far away country next April for a job, so basically, that'll be an 8-9 month break.)
But bro, do you have any advice on the cycle I proposed?? lol. I'd finally like to get some advise on it! haha.
-
07-01-2009, 11:18 PM #105
-
07-01-2009, 11:22 PM #106Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
I actually think my cycle is much better then Jigga's.. I am completely open to change. However, I am not going to be running prop throughout, because I already have Di-test (dosed at 400mg/mL) so I want to use that, so I don't have to shoot so much oil. Also, I want to start the NPP after the prop has kicked in, to ensure no libido problems. I dunno.. I'm more asking if anyone has opinions on different timings (more appropriate for each individual compound).. or has suggestions on switching one compound out for another, etc..
(weeks 1 – 16) di-test @ 500mg ew
(weeks 1 – 4) test-prop @ 500mg ew
(weeks 3 – 14) npp @ 450mg ew
(weeks 3 – 10) t-bol @ 60 ed
(weeks 16 – 19 ) d-drol → prohormone
I mean I don't even think it's a particularly heavy cycle! It's just test/deca /t-bol (very-mild)/ and a legal PH... nothing too terrible in there..
-
07-01-2009, 11:26 PM #107
I dont' think you will have an issue with libido, even though the di-test and prop are just starting to build up in your blood, you will still have MORE than enough in your system to counter any libido issues from the NPP
but, either way. if it was me, I would start the NPP with the test
what are the esters of the di-test?
I guess timing depends on your purpose for the timing. Why are you starting tbol on week 3?
-
07-01-2009, 11:31 PM #108Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
-
07-01-2009, 11:38 PM #109
OK, i can understand that then.
just keep in mind that even though blood plasma levels don't peak or "kick in" til whatever week, the test is still being released into your blood so you will have it flowing from day one. Thats why some people will start to see libido increases from one or two weeks from starting a cycle
but if you feel better waiting, then it won't hurt anything to wait
-
07-02-2009, 12:40 AM #110
196 is deceiving at your height, at least to real bodybuilders, and your upper body has come along nicely. You have decent arms for your weight, your back will be wide as hell if you keep working on it (i can tell u got great genetics from the back), and you have a good tight waist, but you are not ready for steroids . Are you really that dead set on doing them? We all had to prove ourselves on here through years of quality posts, and you will get there, and be a respected member some day. Anyone can get on here, and learn about steroids, and go around educating people like they are the newest steroid guru. if you really want the respect of others, keep helping out in the steroid section, but get your ass in the workout and diet forum, and help out, as well as learn a thing or two. We all learn something new every day, and the day you think you have learned it all, is the day you stop being a good bodybuilder.
-
07-02-2009, 12:58 AM #111
No offense, but after one cycle (let alone 2 or 3) you should be bigger than that, and I would take a step back and examine how you train and eat. I was dumb once, took a bunch of steroids , and went from 165 to 205 at the age of 18 (turned 19 mid cycle), and went all the way up to 215 after my cycle was over, but leaned out at 195, and my height is 5'10". It took years, but I got to 205 at a leaner weight, and with good quality muscle, and it was all natural, and I was very patient, and grinded away week after week. Sorry, I don't mean to toot my own horn, but I am an example of someone who had their little experience with steroids, and has made good quality gains for several years after taking steroids. You don't need to take them. Save your money, and eat like a bad ass. Every time I think of buying roids, or some new fancy supplement, I think of how many eggs, chicken breasts, and steaks I could buy with the money instead. So, why don't you post your diet, training routine, and lifestyle habits, and i GUARANTEE you that everyone would be much more willing to critique your cycle if you are dead set on doing it. My advice would be to stay away from so many compounds at your age. dbol /test/deca is a nice little beginner cycle for someone your age.
-
07-02-2009, 01:08 AM #112Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
My god.. it's like the blind leading the blind around here...
Thanks for the life story their Kaptain.
Next time before you post.. you should think... reflect.... and then do some freakingresearch. because if you did, you would realize that the next cycle I'm doing is: test /npp (WHICH IS DECA ) / t-bol (WHICH IS MILDER THEN D-BOL)....
oh my. you must feel pretty stupid right now.
Also, that rant was essentially meaningless to me.
I gained 30 pounds in 1/2 a year. and you gained 10 pounds, over the course of multiple years training naturally...mmmhmm..
Moreover, a lot of that was lean muscle mass (how could I have possibly gained that much LMM if I didn't know how to train/diet... please explain that to me)
I know how to eat bro. Trust me.
-
07-02-2009, 01:15 AM #113Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
I'm off to bed. I'll check out this thread tomorrow night.
Hopefully ChuckT makes an appearance by then, that coward.
-
07-02-2009, 01:16 AM #114
I read my response. Don't hurt my feelings or anything
-
07-02-2009, 01:21 AM #115
I started at 145 at age 18, and now at 23, I have gotten to 205 at 12% bf, with one cycle. did you notice how i said i got leaner when i went from 195 to 205? that means i lost fat, and gained more than 10 pounds of muscle. I don't feel stupid. I stay away from steroids now, so I don't keep up with what you guys are calling deca these days. You say you have done 3 cycles, right? If you are over 6 feet tall, and have done 3 cycles, you have no business weighing 195 at your bodyfat percentage. You need to eat better, train harder, and/or get more rest. Does that explain it for you? And my post was not a rant at all. I complimented you, was respectful, and gave you solid advice. You don't seem to learn anything, so I seem to have wasted my time with you. Can't say I didn't try guys. T-mos, good luck with this guy.
-
07-02-2009, 01:26 AM #116Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
Thats chill bro. Thanks for the comments. I know I could have gotten naturally bigger. But that's in the past, I don't care. It's already happened, I'm not going to dwell on it.
Anyways, regarding my OP... this is my proposed cycle.. would you modify it in any way?
(weeks 1 – 16) di-test @ 500mg ew
(weeks 1 – 4) test-prop @ 500mg ew
(weeks 3 – 14) npp @ 450mg ew
(weeks 3 – 10) t-bol @ 60 ed
(weeks 16 – 19 ) d-drol → prohormone
(keeping in might, i want to start the NPP mid-cycle. and I want to run the T-bol with the NPP concurrently.)Last edited by seriousmass; 07-02-2009 at 01:28 AM.
-
07-02-2009, 01:27 AM #117Banned
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 1,751
-
07-02-2009, 02:24 AM #118
Actually, me just knowing that you shouldn't be taking steroids allows me to conclude that my knowledge of steroids is far superior to yours, and I'm sure everyone will agree to that. And, why are you scratching your head?
-
07-02-2009, 06:42 AM #119
My work here is done.
Last edited by chuckt12345; 07-02-2009 at 07:08 AM.
-
07-02-2009, 06:52 AM #120
i used to be your height and weight
i was small
i didnt use steroids
i ate food
im still small in relativeness to your stats
better body fat then you and better muscle maturity but in ratio to your stats mine are close to the same just on a larger scale
i do think this thread has run its course
cycle more if you wish. but be sure to focus on diet and training more
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Zebol 50 - deca?
12-10-2024, 07:18 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS