Thread: EQ Only Cycle
-
08-25-2009, 06:08 PM #41
DUDE YGPM, I REFUSE TO ARGUE WITH YOU IN THE OPEN FORUM ANY LONGER... I DO NOT GIVE ADVICE THAT IS HARMFUL...
TEST SHOULD BE THE BASE IN EVERY CYCLE.. POINT BLANK... STOP LIVING IN THE '80's and get with the times MAN....
THANK YOU BROTHA !!!! THAT'S WHAT I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO SAY !!!!!
You da Man !!
Let's Jam !!
-
08-25-2009, 06:33 PM #42
you guys are probly big already so running the eq alone you say wont help you much, what if it was your first time and your not that big 150 and you do eq alone for your first time, your going to have noticable gains right
-
08-25-2009, 06:34 PM #43
sorry to jump in reason Im asking is because thats probly what im going to do, not because I thought it was the best but what was available,
-
-
08-25-2009, 07:06 PM #45
why the heck do they have it then whats its purpose
-
08-25-2009, 07:10 PM #46
looking at the effectiveness chart the weight gain is in the middle with a high strength gain rating and very low sides
-
08-25-2009, 07:24 PM #47
Don't look at the effectiveness chart.. ASK US... The knowledgeable AAS users of the Board...
-
08-26-2009, 12:25 AM #48
-
08-26-2009, 12:35 AM #49
added \/
Last edited by Dancer; 08-26-2009 at 01:21 AM.
-
08-26-2009, 01:21 AM #50
Here again you want your dick to work right use test.
You like your immunity use test.
If you wanna take a chance and find out if you are one of the lucky ones that can take yeard off test without any labido or immune issue go right ahead.
Final point, You have no data to prove any point you make.
I, and I can state the data, can prove that having test in the blood stream aids labido and immune function... If you want eh articles again just ask.
-
08-26-2009, 01:27 AM #51
I agree,
Just because his labido works great without test does not mean all the evidence should be avoided.
More over, its great he never has immune issues but I feel a moral/ethical issue just not voicing the majority view.
Cycles without test, for any newby reading this, can cause more than one issue.
-
08-26-2009, 10:44 AM #52New Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Posts
- 45
Ok so Eq is a very weak androgen, so if you put a test in it wiil makes better gains. but do you need a strong androgen aswell for max results?
-
08-26-2009, 10:49 AM #53
Personally I wouldnt waste your time with the compound, its weak and there is that much debate on forums about its effectiveness, that alone should tell you something!, you would be better with the Test only IMHO but the only way to find out if you respond to eq is to try it on its own and see what you gain, best of luck!
-
08-26-2009, 01:07 PM #54New Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Kuwait
- Posts
- 27
-
08-26-2009, 01:08 PM #55New Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- Kuwait
- Posts
- 27
-
08-27-2009, 07:20 PM #56Associate Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2007
- Location
- new york
- Posts
- 470
Actually its not, its obvious to anyone with half a brain that spooledup is right about everything, and the other guy is using the classic bro-science approach by demanding studies. If anything, this is just hilarious, he really insists on seeing those studies. And watching the others chime in is even better, a majority of people on this site just blindly give the same advice over and over without even for a second considering the person has goals far different from their own.
-
08-27-2009, 09:11 PM #57
spooled argues this point atleast twice a week.
and is wrong, 3 times a week.
please dont follow his advice on this
-
08-28-2009, 07:53 PM #58Associate Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2009
- Location
- purgatory
- Posts
- 215
please throw in some test if you plan to run the eq at 500 mgs/week..you will be glad you did!!
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS