Results 1 to 2 of 2
  1. #1
    titan13 is offline Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    ohio
    Posts
    123

    npp vrs deca bulking cycle

    I am thinking of doing a bulking cycle of test 600 and deca 400, or test 600 and npp 400 for 12 weeks. What due you all think about npp being easier to recover from, and giving you leaner gains? I am 35 yrs 6'1'' 17% bfi 240 lbs 5th cycle 12 years in gym. I will use hcg 250iu 2x week during cycle from 2-12, and standard pct nolva and clomid . will run aromason 12.5 mg eod during 1-12. Thanks ahead of time for your input.

  2. #2
    Nooomoto's Avatar
    Nooomoto is offline Productive Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    3,300
    You're a little high on the dose for deca /npp, no? I love both. The benefit (or downside depending on what you're doing) of NPP is the ester. It will kick in faster and you'll be able to recover faster, the down side is more pinning. For a shorter cycle <12 weeks, I'd go with NPP. I think at 12 weeks you could go with deca and be just as fine.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •