Thread: penny for your thoughts
-
07-24-2012, 09:20 AM #41Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 587
-
07-24-2012, 09:26 AM #42Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 587
-
07-24-2012, 11:21 AM #43
i know you can not keep over your genetic limit with out being on. That you will revert to that.
Thats what you back tracked and stated. And i agree with that,
At first you said everyone looses after a cycle and reverts back to where they started. And i stand by that. That is not true.
They are 2 completely different things.If people can't tell your on steroids then your doing them wrong
-
07-24-2012, 01:37 PM #44Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 587
Come on man stop playing and changing what i said please, my exact words were "when you stop cycling you will lose most of your gains and go back to what you could have achieved naturally"
let me guess, i didnt say that
-
07-24-2012, 03:19 PM #45Originally Posted by adamjames
Now, to your earlier point, I must disagree. I appreciate the analogies as they can be useful in illustrating or simplifying an argument, however, your use of a car without petrol as an analogy to the body in the absence of steroids , is inaccurate. True, a car without fuel isn't going to travel very far, but a user of a steroid cycle isn't the same. The human body is never depleted of all hormones. In fact, we would be in a life threatening condition if all hormonal activity was completed arrested - loss of muscle gains would in fact be the least of our concerns. While it is true, exogenous steroids will suppress endogenous productions, there is always a physiological response, weak or otherwise. Moreover, the knowledgable user would (should) observe a proper protocol in which aromatase activity would would be kept in check and a PCT including hcg to restart natural testosterone production would be followed at the end of a cycle. Thus, the body at the end of a cycle is never "a car without fuel".
Now, I don't disagree that some gains are lost. Anyone who argues that they have retained 100% of all gains is overstating reality. A loss of gains however depends on many factors and the degree of loss will vary. Sure, the guy/girl who thinks they can run a cycle of AAs and then at the end of the cycle return to a sedentary lifestyle of beer and pizza, is in for a tremendous letdown! This is why we preach the hell out of diet and exercise and tell the "new users" to spend several years developing a diet and exercise curriculum that they will stay committed to and will support their gains between cycles. In the absence of these things, gains will be hard to maintain. Another reason some gains are lost is that some anabolics promote water retention. With these compounds, naturally there will be observable losses when the compounds are stopped, but not all steroids are alike. Some promote far less water retention (e.g. Primo, winni, anavar ) and lead to sustainable lean muscle gains. The key to success, as we have said all along is a LONG TERM commitment to diet and exercise. Anyone looking to steroids for a quick fix, ought to look elsewhere.
-
07-24-2012, 03:22 PM #46
^^^ Waited all day for that post. Well said
-
07-24-2012, 03:29 PM #47Originally Posted by Capebuffalo
-
07-24-2012, 03:47 PM #48Originally Posted by adamjames
This is 100% not true. Where are you getting your information dude?
-
07-24-2012, 03:50 PM #49Originally Posted by adamjames
-
07-24-2012, 03:53 PM #50Originally Posted by adamjames
-
07-24-2012, 04:13 PM #51Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 587
You make some good points, you also make some bad points, im not going to go into a detailed counter argument to the points i disagree with because no offence but your post is too long winded and i cant be bothered atm im just watching a film(kill the irishman) and while i agree that a world with no insults would be a nice world it would also be a tremendous bore because its simply in our nature as humans to be mean sometimes, so lets celebrate our wickedness and raise a glass to Hitler
Nice tatts btw and the abbs arent to bad either bro
-
07-24-2012, 04:16 PM #52Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 587
-
07-24-2012, 04:43 PM #53Originally Posted by adamjames
I'm not ready to raise a glass to someone espousing ethnic cleansing, but to each his own.
Thanks, I can't recall which took longer, the abs or the tats or which was more painful to achieve. Perhaps the same. I cover them both well in the hospitals and clinics but it drives the nurses wild when they find out what's underneath.
-
07-24-2012, 05:11 PM #54Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 587
-
07-24-2012, 05:24 PM #55Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Location
- UK
- Posts
- 587
-
07-24-2012, 06:59 PM #56Originally Posted by adamjames
-
07-24-2012, 07:56 PM #57
I myself would like some closure on the issue. From the post the consensus seems to be you can keep your gains from your cycle. Not all your gains but your not going to deflate like a ballon.AJ seems to be the only one disagreeing with this. And no longer wishes to debate his point. Because some statements are too long winded. Fair enough. Op I hope you can draw your own conclusion from the post and the people who have posted. Being your first cycle you don't know. But I would guess there are an abundance of total cycles between all the posters and the majority my all be delusional but we do believe gains can be kept.
-
07-24-2012, 08:01 PM #58Originally Posted by Capebuffalo
How's that for brevity??
-
07-24-2012, 08:09 PM #59
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Blast cycle thoughts
Yesterday, 02:28 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS