-
02-04-2014, 10:17 PM #1Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 175
Better chances for fertility with trt or short cycles
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
Seems to me the length of time HPTA is shut down even with HCG affects the return to normal function. Within reason I'm sure and depending on the aas used but I've heard of success with short 2 week cycles with test prop and quick full recoveries.
-
02-05-2014, 08:32 AM #2
Definitely better to come off then stay on. Trt is not a picnic. It's a pain in the as$. Literally speaking.
Two weeks for a burst is a little short. Why not wait till after kids.
-
02-05-2014, 10:20 AM #3Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 175
I would wait until after kids but im currently single so I don't see that in my immediate future. I don't mind the pinning or trt management I am just concerned with the effects long term. If I lose fertility it's not worth it.
Before trt I did not feel well for a while. It has definitely benefited me so far, I feel much better. If there were a way not to risk fertility and maintain the health I have gained I would do it.
-
02-05-2014, 11:21 AM #4
So are you currently on trt?
-
02-05-2014, 12:06 PM #5Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 175
Yes three months in. Debating getting off. Health benefits are great but at the possible expense of fertility.
-
02-05-2014, 12:10 PM #6
As long as HCG is used during TRT then you will stay fertile. TRT without HCG is dumb even if you dont plan on having kids.
I was mentioning earlier on here of two men I know that have been on HCG monotherapy instead of TRT. One guy for 6 years and the other for 3. Another guy I know impregnated their wife after a year on HCG + Test.
-
02-05-2014, 12:40 PM #7
There is a slight chance you can become infertile but it's extremely low on trt and hcg . I would run a low dose of clomid eod if you want to be extra cautious. I'm glad your asking and being responsible. Get bw every 3-5 months and even sperm Count.
There is more you can do in future if sperm Count is low.
If trt is working great for you then you obviously needed it.
-
02-05-2014, 01:33 PM #8Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 175
Yes I definitely felt a big difference in general and less joint pain/aches especially in my back. Libido never really went away but improved. I did it for the physical benefits that used to be natural for me. Not excited about therapy because of my age but it's worth it.
Fertility is the chief concern. I will get sperm checked and possibly frozen. I need to ensure my HCG is good and fine tune my dosing. I wasn't away that clomid is okay for long term use. Can it stimulate LH and fsh with synthetic t? And could that cause over stimulation issues? Not sure what metric would gauge the dosing
-
02-05-2014, 02:58 PM #9
Glad your worrying about fertility but your gtg. I changed my mind. Get periodic sperm check and if you see a difference throw some clomid in there. It's not good for all the time use according to what i have read and know. But i will dose e3d for a month and then stop for a few.
i was on aas for 2 years when younger and never came off and never did hcg or pct etc.
i started hcg and sperm came back and I'm gtg. This was years ago. Your body is a resilient thing
-
02-05-2014, 04:46 PM #10Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 175
Thanks for the help. Clomid seems like a good idea, maybe even better to drop test levels for a couple weeks and continue HCG with clomid. I will get checked out and adjust from there.
After 2 years of use I would say that is resiliency. Glad you were not permanently affected.
-
02-05-2014, 08:26 PM #11
-
02-05-2014, 09:01 PM #12Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 175
-
02-05-2014, 11:23 PM #13
You will be fine. Even if its low (it wont be) there are a lot of methods to increase your count. Many methods we use doctors do not even know about.
-
02-06-2014, 08:07 AM #14
-
02-06-2014, 08:15 AM #15
HCG has been shown to have an effect on sperm and there are many cases where TEST + HCG = pregnant. Obviously not to the extent of HMG but HMG is not easily accessible for nearly anyone and the cost is so much greater than that of HCG. With 75iu of HMG a day you will impregnate any girl within a 15 foot radius. haha
HMG would be awsome in conjunction with HCG but It just so damn expensive for now. In the future this might be the preferred and practical option. Only time will tell.
-
02-06-2014, 08:27 AM #16
-
02-06-2014, 08:36 AM #17Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 175
-
02-06-2014, 08:54 AM #18
-
02-06-2014, 08:58 AM #19
I ran HCG my second cycle and then used HMG on top of the HCG for the last week of the cycle at 50iu per day. I definately noticed a somewhat increase in my recovery. My source was foreign and therefore I am not 100% sure it was completely pure or potent. cannot discuss price but it was 3-4 times the cost of my HCG.
HMG is an equal combination of the two. Pure FSH analogue is rFSH and it is synthesized.
I ran it alongside my existing HCG.
So total LH analogue consumption was around 100iu per day (700iu for the week)
and FSh analogue was at 37.5iu per day. (260iu for the week)
It was a decent little experiment. The dosage of gear and duration of cycle was the same as my first. Same AI and dosage, Same PCT. Only thing different was HMG. I recovered great my first cycle. It just happened faster with the second cycle.
I have no statistical evidence but I can tell you it was a better PCT.Last edited by Test Rage; 02-06-2014 at 09:08 AM.
-
02-06-2014, 09:03 AM #20
^^^ You should edit your post and remove the prices you paid.
-
02-06-2014, 09:08 AM #21
-
02-06-2014, 09:18 AM #22
So you took HCG and HMG at the same time?
-
02-06-2014, 09:24 AM #23
Yes 75iu a day of HCG and 75iu a day of HMG. Next time I will be doing extensive blood work before during and after and making a log.
-
02-06-2014, 09:32 AM #24
-
02-06-2014, 09:43 AM #25
HMG mimics both gonadotropins. No need to use both.
~ PLEASE DO NOT ASK FOR SOURCE CHECKS ~
"It's human nature in a 'more is better' society full of a younger generation that expects instant gratification, then complain when they don't get it. The problem will get far worse before it gets better". ~ kelkel
-
02-06-2014, 10:00 AM #26
In this post I fully described what I did.
HMG does have both but IU:IU I believe the FSH in HMG is more powerful at what it does than the LH of HMG or HCG.
So i took about 700iu per week of LH analog (450iu from HCG and 250iu that is found in the HMG) and apx 250iu of week of FSH (that is occuring in the HMG).
I dont know if Im describing what I did properly for ppl to understand but hopefully that makes it more clear. Doing it again I would try to get more HMG and instead of running more during that week I would just run it for two weeks next to HCG. i feel all you need is a little FSH in the action to go a long ways. Also HMG does not aromatize as aggressively as HCG.
Im open to experimenting with both or just HMG alone. Idk what i will do next. I still have access to it but HCG only can keep a man fertile and help in recover greatly so I dont know about spending all that money on it.
Hopefully it will become better studied and more available just like HCG.Last edited by Test Rage; 02-06-2014 at 10:09 AM.
-
02-06-2014, 04:54 PM #27Associate Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2013
- Posts
- 175
Any thoughts on dosing for HCG and hmg to mimic natural secretion ? Not sure about the rather large amounts people use of HCG only two or three days a week.
Good info guys, I appreciate the posting.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Did I pin the ventrogluteal?...
Yesterday, 07:11 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS