Chuck eyeguaged Randy in Rand/Chuck III !!!!

**GQ-Bouncer** · 02-07-2006, 07:54 AM

I KNEW IT!!

**DustinJ** · 02-07-2006, 08:06 AM

Finally someone else see Chuck nice tricks, don't forget Randy/Chuck II or the Chuck/Tito fight all 3 there where definite eye "pokes"

**GQ-Bouncer** · 02-07-2006, 08:54 AM

yeah dude, infact, the only guy Liddel didnt gauge was Jackson, and Chuck lost that fight

**yourmom** · 02-07-2006, 10:14 AM

Finally! Someone else see that shit! Now tell my buddy 'The undisputed Chuck Fan' That his boy is a fraud! YM

**catabolic kid** · 02-07-2006, 01:24 PM

That picture makes me sick.

**scriptfactory** · 02-07-2006, 01:33 PM

You people are retarded. There is no eye gouge in that picture. None of Chuck's fingers are inside of Randy's eye. This was already debated on Sherdog... Randy fans just need a reason for their hero's loss. "He slipped!" "He was eye gouged!"

No.

**catabolic kid** · 02-07-2006, 01:40 PM

Originally Posted by scriptfactory

You people are retarded. There is no eye gouge in that picture. None of Chuck's fingers are inside of Randy's eye. This was already debated on Sherdog... Randy fans just need a reason for their hero's loss. "He slipped!" "He was eye gouged!"

No.

I am not sure if it was an eye gouge or not....but the picture still makes me sick. I really hated to see Randy loose. At his age, he is not what he used to be and I wished he never would have taken that fight anyway. Chuck Lidell is better than the 42 year old versoin of Randy Couture.

**scriptfactory** · 02-07-2006, 01:42 PM

Originally Posted by catabolic kid

I am not sure if it was an eye gouge or not....but the picture still makes me sick. I really hated to see Randy loose. At his age, he is not what he used to be and I wished he never would have taken that fight anyway. Chuck Lidell is better than the 42 year old versoin of Randy Couture.

I definitely agree with this.

**Grappler13** · 02-07-2006, 02:03 PM

Originally Posted by scriptfactory

You people are retarded. There is no eye gouge in that picture. None of Chuck's fingers are inside of Randy's eye. This was already debated on Sherdog... Randy fans just need a reason for their hero's loss. "He slipped!" "He was eye gouged!"

No.

His left index finger is IN Randy's eye up to the first knuckle. Also, how many open palm straight jabs do you see in MMA? Chuck beat Randy without a doubt but it doesn't excuse a cheap gouge like that.

**Hunter** · 02-07-2006, 02:14 PM

Its hard to say if it was on purpose or not. Also tito ducked into chucks hand rewatch the fight. I dont think Chuck does it on purpose also Chuck has always been clumsy on the mic so I am not sure if he met to be disrespectful or not he did give Randy his time in the octagon so its a tough call the only person that will ever really know if chuck.

**scriptfactory** · 02-07-2006, 02:29 PM

Originally Posted by Grappler13

His left index finger is IN Randy's eye up to the first knuckle. Also, how many open palm straight jabs do you see in MMA? Chuck beat Randy without a doubt but it doesn't excuse a cheap gouge like that.

Where do you see this?! Do you see the tip of his left index finger touching Randy's eyebrow? How can it be in his eye and outside of it at the same time?

Anyways, that wasn't a strike. He was pushing Randy's face away which is legal as far as I know.

**Grappler13** · 02-07-2006, 02:32 PM

Originally Posted by scriptfactory

Where do you see this?! Do you see the tip of his left index finger touching Randy's eyebrow? How can it be in his eye and outside of it at the same time?

Anyways, that wasn't a strike. He was pushing Randy's face away which is legal as far as I know.

It's always easy to second guess a still shot and they were throwing fast. I'm inclined to believe it was intentional due to Chuck's history of "clumsy" pushes. IMO, Chuck won regardless.

**GQ-Bouncer** · 02-07-2006, 03:01 PM

Originally Posted by scriptfactory

You people are retarded. There is no eye gouge in that picture. None of Chuck's fingers are inside of Randy's eye. This was already debated on Sherdog... Randy fans just need a reason for their hero's loss. "He slipped!" "He was eye gouged!"

No.

Yup, and that reason is because he was gauged...

i can sleep well at night now. Scriptfactory... dont take that away from me.... please ... don't

**USfighterFC** · 02-07-2006, 03:21 PM

You people need to let go. Randy lost and it had nothing to do with an eyepoke. He got beat by the better man. I love Randy but Chuck is just better than him plain and simple.

**swizole** · 02-07-2006, 03:37 PM

Originally Posted by USfighterFC

You people need to let go. Randy lost and it had nothing to do with an eyepoke. He got beat by the better man. I love Randy but Chuck is just better than him plain and simple.

Agreed, quit making lame excuses. When Randy beat Chuck there was no excuses. Chuck Fans coulda said well anyone has a punchers chance to win a fight, and Randy got lucky in the first fight. It's all bullshit.

**catabolic kid** · 02-07-2006, 06:07 PM

Originally Posted by swizole

Agreed, quit making lame excuses. When Randy beat Chuck there was no excuses. Chuck Fans coulda said well anyone has a punchers chance to win a fight, and Randy got lucky in the first fight. It's all bullshit.

The way Randy won the first fight could never be compared to a punchers chance. Also, when Randy won alot of people said it was becasue Chuck was not in shape.

**catabolic kid** · 02-07-2006, 06:19 PM

Originally Posted by USfighterFC

You people need to let go. Randy lost and it had nothing to do with an eyepoke. He got beat by the better man. I love Randy but Chuck is just better than him plain and simple.

Mike Tyson lost his last couple of fights in his boxing career. Can you really say that the guys that beat him are better than him? No, you cannot.

Chuck beat Randy because Randy is not in his prime...that is the bottom line. When Randy was in HW and on top of his game you know that he would have beaten Chuck.

So, yes, you are right. Randy lost and it was not because of an eyepoke. And yes, Chuck is better than the 42 year old version of Randy Couture.

**USfighterFC** · 02-07-2006, 07:01 PM

Originally Posted by catabolic kid

Mike Tyson lost his last couple of fights in his boxing career. Can you really say that the guys that beat him are better than him? No, you cannot.

Chuck beat Randy because Randy is not in his prime...that is the bottom line. When Randy was in HW and on top of his game you know that he would have beaten Chuck.

So, yes, you are right. Randy lost and it was not because of an eyepoke. And yes, Chuck is better than the 42 year old version of Randy Couture.

Yeah I can really say that the guys that beat tyson in his last fights are better than him. Why? because Tyson lost and they won, hence they are better than him. Chuck beat Randy because he was the better man that night. You can't honestly say that a "prime" randy would beat chuck. Why? Cuz the fight never happened. Chuck has beaten nearly every light heavyweight that Randy has and actually laid out more of them. Chuck also came into that first fight totally unprepared and not in great physical condition. And I dont even like Chuck I wanted Randy to win so i'm not some blind chuck liddell fan.

**catabolic kid** · 02-07-2006, 08:40 PM

Originally Posted by USfighterFC

Yeah I can really say that the guys that beat tyson in his last fights are better than him. Why? because Tyson lost and they won, hence they are better than him. Chuck beat Randy because he was the better man that night. You can't honestly say that a "prime" randy would beat chuck. Why? Cuz the fight never happened. Chuck has beaten nearly every light heavyweight that Randy has and actually laid out more of them. Chuck also came into that first fight totally unprepared and not in great physical condition. And I dont even like Chuck I wanted Randy to win so i'm not some blind chuck liddell fan.

Well, Randy is not in his prime, obviously. So, Chuck beat Randy when he was over the hill. Would you agree with that?

**swizole** · 02-07-2006, 08:46 PM

Originally Posted by catabolic kid

Well, Randy is not in his prime, obviously. So, Chuck beat Randy when he was over the hill. Would you agree with that?

I agree Randy was not in his prime, was that Chuck's fault? NO! Could Chuck have beaten Randy in his prime? You better believe it.

**USfighterFC** · 02-07-2006, 08:56 PM

Originally Posted by catabolic kid

Well, Randy is not in his prime, obviously. So, Chuck beat Randy when he was over the hill. Would you agree with that?

Yeah I'll agree with that. Randy isnt what he was.

**catabolic kid** · 02-07-2006, 09:32 PM

Originally Posted by USfighterFC

Yeah I'll agree with that. Randy isnt what he was.

Thanks. I just hate to see him go out like that. You see it in many athletes careers. Look at Jerry Rice (considered the best WR of all time), he did not even start his last 2 seasons in the NFL. But, in MMA, when you are over the hill, you get beaten badly....alot worse than not catching passes!!

**USfighterFC** · 02-07-2006, 09:41 PM

Originally Posted by catabolic kid

Thanks. I just hate to see him go out like that. You see it in many athletes careers. Look at Jerry Rice (considered the best WR of all time), he did not even start his last 2 seasons in the NFL. But, in MMA, when you are over the hill, you get beaten badly....alot worse than not catching passes!!

Yeah I agree....it also seems your skills start declining very rapidly as well....just think of Roy Jones

**dynamike** · 02-07-2006, 09:50 PM

he thows that left out open handed feelin the distance...appaerntly it didnt effect him if he did poke him..i love randy..i do hes a true peaceful warrior...but there was no reaction on his part ..that he was effected by an eye poke..

**catabolic kid** · 02-07-2006, 10:34 PM

Originally Posted by USfighterFC

Yeah I agree....it also seems your skills start declining very rapidly as well....just think of Roy Jones

I know that I read somewhere that when you age the first thing (athletic ability) to go is your quickness/agility. This cannot help your takedowns!! I think that one of the last things to go is your absolute strength. I think that Randys skills or whatever it was declined fast. After he dominated Chuck he went on to dominate Tito and Vitor....he dominated all of the light heavys the UFC had....which all 3 were world class guys at the time.

**Tedbear981** · 02-07-2006, 11:30 PM

Roy Jones was my boy.....Its a shame...

**DizzyBoy** · 02-08-2006, 02:44 AM

Originally Posted by swizole

I agree Randy was not in his prime, was that Chuck's fault? NO! Could Chuck have beaten Randy in his prime? You better believe it.

Who cares bout Couture... He retired... I wanna see Silva beat teh fuk outta Liddel. B/c we all know Silva would smoke Liddel.

**dynamike** · 02-08-2006, 03:43 AM

how can u not care about a legend like Couture..every warrior has a time to hang up the gloves,the shoulder padas, etc. simply an ignorant statement..whats past...is prologue

**DizzyBoy** · 02-08-2006, 09:00 AM

Originally Posted by dynamike

how can u not care about a legend like Couture..every warrior has a time to hang up the gloves,the shoulder padas, etc. simply an ignorant statement..whats past...is prologue

Ignorant statement? What was I lacking knowledge in? I know Couture was an awesome fighter. I meant who cares about Couture in the sense that I wanna see Silva knockout Liddel. Learn to read context. And learn some vocab. Ignorant =
1. Lacking education or knowledge.
2. Showing or arising from a lack of education or knowledge: an ignorant mistake.
3. Unaware or uninformed.

**dynamike** · 02-08-2006, 11:58 AM

great another sensitive, genius, internet tough guy...lol...have a nice day einstein!

**swizole** · 02-08-2006, 06:37 PM

Originally Posted by dynamike

great another sensitive, genius, internet tough guy...lol...have a nice day einstein!

hahaha

**Haro3** · 02-08-2006, 06:40 PM

you guys cant defend couture none of those fights are 100% clean. just because there arent pictures of couture doing it doesnt mean he doesnt ? I do agree tho thats a nast azz pic,

**swizole** · 02-08-2006, 06:40 PM

I also would like to see Silva step in the ring with Chuck.... and watch Chuck beat that fat slob all over the octagon.

**USfighterFC** · 02-08-2006, 06:54 PM

who's a fat slob?

BG · 02-08-2006, 06:58 PM

Originally Posted by USfighterFC

who's a fat slob?

Im with you US..FC. I met Chuck in AC, if anyones fat its him, not Wandy, and for the record I think Wandy would destroy Chuck Pride or Ufc rules.

**swizole** · 02-08-2006, 07:15 PM

yeah chuck is kinda fat.... haha.. but silva looks likes 250 lbs of chewed bubble gum, although he is a badass, chuck would whipe the floor with his ass.

**USfighterFC** · 02-08-2006, 07:17 PM

Silva looks like chewed bubble gum?? Are we talking about the same silva?

BG · 02-08-2006, 07:30 PM

Originally Posted by USfighterFC

Silva looks like chewed bubble gum?? Are we talking about the same silva?

I think he means Silvia???

**GQ-Bouncer** · 02-08-2006, 07:40 PM

Originally Posted by DizzyBoy

Ignorant statement? What was I lacking knowledge in? I know Couture was an awesome fighter. I meant who cares about Couture in the sense that I wanna see Silva knockout Liddel. Learn to read context. And learn some vocab. Ignorant =
1. Lacking education or knowledge.
2. Showing or arising from a lack of education or knowledge: an ignorant mistake.
3. Unaware or uninformed.

In all fairness, he was just making an argument point

**GQ-Bouncer** · 02-08-2006, 07:43 PM

Originally Posted by BigGuns101

Im with you US..FC. I met Chuck in AC, if anyones fat its him, not Wandy, and for the record I think Wandy would destroy Chuck Pride or Ufc rules.

I disagree,
Liddel, 2nd round via Eyeguage

Thread: Chuck eyeguaged Randy in Rand/Chuck III !!!!

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Chuck eyeguaged Randy in Rand/Chuck III !!!!

Come On

You may be right.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

Posting Permissions

First Test-E cycle in 10 years

Traveling/flying with testosterone

First Test-E cycle in 10 years

First Test-E cycle in 10 years

First Test-E cycle in 10 years

First Test-E cycle in 10 years