-
10-19-2005, 04:08 PM #41
Lunacy is this a phd exam work(not sure what this is called on english) or are you already a phd?
-
10-19-2005, 04:36 PM #42Originally Posted by johan
Are you working on a PhD or have one and what kind of research do you do?
Oh, and we call "phd exam work" just working on your PhD and after you get the title of PhD you are a post-doc and do your work as a post-doc for a while until you become, if ever, a PI (principle investigator).Last edited by Lunacy; 10-19-2005 at 04:42 PM.
-
10-19-2005, 05:14 PM #43Originally Posted by johan
-
10-19-2005, 08:01 PM #44Originally Posted by johan
-
10-19-2005, 08:48 PM #45AR Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 25,737
I love my dextrose!!
~SC~
-
10-19-2005, 10:00 PM #46
id have to agree swole. whats your take on this subject? do you think high gi carbs like dextrose are more beneficial for pwo then low gi? how do you rate the importance of raising your insuling immeidately post workout with high gi carbs and whey?
-
10-20-2005, 01:14 AM #47Originally Posted by Lunacy
Im just working to get my masters of science right now in teorethical physics. But I plan on going into grad school right away when Im done. Astrophysics most probably.
-
10-20-2005, 04:46 AM #48
i was interested to see that consuming carbohydrates during exercise didnt have any effect according to that study
would that include a a cab drink, dex, or a sports drink - i see most people in my gym walking around with them
i dont personally but thats onlt cos i cant be arsed to buy them
-
10-20-2005, 07:07 AM #49
I think the only real good time to perhaps add a carbohydrate drink it during a really hard leg day. It important to hydrate yourself as well as replenish electrolytes.
-
10-20-2005, 11:03 AM #50AR Hall of Fame
- Join Date
- Dec 2002
- Posts
- 25,737
Originally Posted by jdh
Just find what works best for you, and you're good to go.
~SC~
-
10-20-2005, 11:15 AM #51
id have to agree with everything swole says, because that pretty much sums it up for me as well. and i have visited his site many times and have seen the pictures and read testimonies so based on that fact that would be the only evidence i would need to go high gi for pwo.
-
10-20-2005, 12:04 PM #52Originally Posted by jdh
-
10-20-2005, 01:45 PM #53Originally Posted by G-Force
-
10-20-2005, 01:45 PM #54
(joking)ha ha i saw that coming g-force. i picked up a few things from his site over the past year and just got to give the guy props. he knows his shit
-
10-20-2005, 01:48 PM #55
he does know his shit yes,
Last edited by G-Force; 10-20-2005 at 01:52 PM.
-
10-20-2005, 01:51 PM #56Originally Posted by G-Force
-
10-20-2005, 01:53 PM #57
but Giantz and Johan also know their shit
although i dont think they eat it
-
10-20-2005, 02:07 PM #58
well since both of them are trying to hate on me because i dont have science to back it up what i say, i would have to lean towards swolecats knowledge more because he has the clients to back it up. thats fine that they have their little "studies" to post, but thats all they have. i have yet to see any physical proof to back up their ways. but i guess since they can pull up all these studies thats all they need to justify what they have to say.
-
10-20-2005, 02:11 PM #59
well jdh science doesnt lie. I am not cut and not buff that is for sure. But studies dont lie if they are not done in a way to make them give false results. Do you doubt the medicine you take because the studies on that medicine is done in the exact same manner.
Science prevails above everything else that is my motto in life.
-
10-20-2005, 02:13 PM #60
and I think if you reread my post you will se that I was nothing but respectfull to you aswell.
and yes one properly done study to me speaks more than 1000 personal experiences.
-
10-20-2005, 02:15 PM #61
ohh and one last thing. The physical proof is in the study. Its not like they did the study on a test dummy or fake human
-
10-20-2005, 02:49 PM #62Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 123
If you looked hard enough you find a study to back up almost any idea.
-
10-20-2005, 02:52 PM #63
I knew someone would come with a reply like that sooner or later yes maby but if you realy read through the study you can tell what is bullshit and not and when several studies support eachothers conclusions the evidence gets pretty much overwhelming.
The scientific method is failsafe since it constantly corrects itself.
-
10-20-2005, 03:02 PM #64Originally Posted by Gassy
Find one...
-
10-20-2005, 03:03 PM #65
What I cant understand is why people get so defensive. No one here is claiming dextrose doesnt work. That would be ridicilous.
If you dont trust science or studies that is fine, but dont insult us because we dont rank personal experiences that high. I dont mean this as a offense to anyone. But me, giantz and g-force wants proof, real verifiable, falsifiable, repetable proof.
Can you get cut while using dextrose pwo? Offcourse we never said anything else.
Do you gain good while using dextrose? Offcourse
Do we feel there might be more healthy options that offer no gains difference but health aspects that might be overlooked aswell as a possible slight fat loss advantage? You bet.
Do we feel our position has a solid scientific foundation? Sure thing.
Do we feel personal experience with no way of keeping tabs on all factors and determining what does what is as reliable as studies? No wayLast edited by Kärnfysikern; 10-20-2005 at 03:06 PM.
-
10-20-2005, 03:07 PM #66
We should probably put this to rest, my main reason for not spiking is quite as simple as this:
Exercise Effects on Muscle Insulin Signaling and Action
Invited Review: Role of insulin in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by amino acids or exercise
Scot R. Kimball1, Peter A. Farrell2, and Leonard S. Jefferson1
1 Department of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey 17033; and 2 Noll Physiology Research Center, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Protein synthesis in skeletal muscle is modulated in response to a variety of stimuli. Two stimuli receiving a great deal of recent attention are increased amino acid availability and exercise. Both of these effectors stimulate protein synthesis in part through activation of translation initiation. However, the full response of translation initiation and protein synthesis to either effector is not observed in the absence of a minimal concentration of insulin. The combination of insulin and either increased amino acid availability or endurance exercise stimulates translation initiation and protein synthesis in part through activation of the ribosomal protein S6 protein kinase S6K1 as well as through enhanced association of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4G with eIF4E, an event that promotes binding of mRNA to the ribosome. In contrast, insulin in combination with resistance exercise stimulates translation initiation and protein synthesis through enhanced activity of a guanine nucleotide exchange protein referred to as eIF2B. In both cases, the amount of insulin required for the effects is low, and a concentration of the hormone that approximates that observed in fasting animals is sufficient for maximal stimulation. This review summarizes the results of a number of recent studies that have helped to establish our present understanding of the interactions of insulin, amino acids, and exercise in the regulation of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle
-
10-20-2005, 03:08 PM #67Junior Member
- Join Date
- Jul 2005
- Posts
- 123
Johan, I always repcect your opinions and think you are a smart guy. I have to disagree with you about the scientific method being failsafe. My Mom is a clinical researcher for a huge drug company. It takes at least 7 YEARS of studies and millions of dollars to get a drug approved by the FDA, huge studies. And the research studies are still wrong a lot, viox lawsuits are gonna cost Merk $100's of millions. I understand that these drug companies are crooked and interested in profits, but the point is that studies do show different results, can be misleading and plain wrong all based on who is doing the study and what thier motives are.
-
10-20-2005, 03:12 PM #68Originally Posted by Gassy
Whoa dude, terrible comparison. That's pharmacology not quite the same as Physiology.
-
10-20-2005, 03:13 PM #69
yes but the studies that are misleading is usualy done that intentionaly to push a medicine for approval ect. In other words mostly when there is a financial gain behind it. When it comes to this specific topic there is no financial gain anywhere so the motives of the researches can pretty much be trusted.
And yes studies can be twisted, turned and made to look in a certain way to prove a point. I dont fully agree with many comonly accepted things(like the whole cholesterol hypothesis for instance).
But in this particular case what I have read and understood myself makes sense, but since I am far from educated in nutrition I dont trust my own oppinion totaly either thats why I also go with respted oppinions from for instance trainers that has undergone the rigours studies to get a masters or phd in nutrition. Or just general phds in nutrition not neccesarly involved with bodybuilding.
I might add though that Im glad Im into physics because physics is alot like maths. A study cant lie and live for long in physics cause everything is so easily falsifiable
-
10-20-2005, 03:28 PM #70
look at it like this
the gym guru might know WHAT works. But the phd can get down into WHY it works and possibly improve on it. That doesnt mean that what used to work suddenly stops working. It doesnt mean that the "what" guy is wrong either(obviously something that works isnt wrong), there is nothing wrong with doing what is proven to work.
It just means that the methods can be slightely improved if one gets down to the science of it all.
No method is perfect, there is always ways to improve. The only way to know for sure how to improve something is through scientific scrutiny.
-
10-20-2005, 04:20 PM #71
good read...
nice g11 and johan
-
10-20-2005, 09:11 PM #72
im going to refer back to swolecat and the fact that he has helped thousands reduce bodyfat and retain muscle while using dextrose for pwo. i dont have a study to back it but isnt the success of thousands worth something?
-
10-20-2005, 11:20 PM #73
i think you're beating a dead horse, jdh...just agree to disagree and keep doin what works for you.
-
10-21-2005, 03:18 AM #74Originally Posted by jdh
yes he is successful - but who's to say he couldnt be more successful if he had incorporated low GI PWO - who's to say that he couldnt have seen even more results from the people he has trained?
could you say that? NO
could i say that? NO i couldnt
could swole? i dont know, i cant answer for him, but probably not because he has most likely never tried it
-
10-21-2005, 03:57 AM #75
jdh. I am in no way trying to take anything away from swole and I think he is a awsome trainer. Offcourse his methods works I have said several times dextrose DO work.
But maby dextrose isnt the best.
There are highely succesfull trainers that use low gi pwo aswell.
Im gonna withdraw from this thread now I dont think nothing else can get out of it realy.
-
10-21-2005, 08:48 AM #76
im also withdrawing from this. like i said before to each his own, but dont take to heart every study you read. g-force swole actually responded earlier in this thread saying he had tried low gi.
-
10-21-2005, 09:15 AM #77
People once thought the world was flat, and also that the earth was the certer of the universe.
-
10-22-2005, 05:47 AM #78Originally Posted by jdh
-
10-29-2005, 01:17 AM #79Associate Member
- Join Date
- Sep 2003
- Posts
- 241
would powdered gatorade be ok as the carb source in the pwo
-
10-29-2005, 05:18 AM #80
wait...so in regard to pre workout meal, how earlier before and what should it consist of?
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Expired dbol (blue hearts)
01-11-2025, 04:00 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS