Results 41 to 62 of 62
-
03-27-2014, 10:48 AM #41
There IS evidence showing that the quality of meat from organic live stock is superior to something from a factory farm, at least in terms of taste and quality. My university dissertation was about the future of the Beef Industry in the UK and I covered a whole ton of this stuff.
When an animal is about to be slaughtered or when they are all being boxed into some tiny truck somewhere, the stress levels in the animals increase dramatically. I can't remember the exact science but the pH in their blood increases, especially prior to slaughter and this WILL compromise the taste and quality of the meat, the meat often coming out a darker colour.
Aren't beef cows in America pumped full of hormones and all sorts so they meet finishing times and weight?
There are many pros and cons of regular food vs organic.
Anyone eating organic obviously can do because they can afford it and likely they enjoy a healthy life style. I don't think i've ever encountered an obese person that predominately eats organic meat and vegetables.
-
03-27-2014, 11:24 AM #42Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 2,220
So bc someone challenged your beliefs you resort to name calling and childish assaults. You sir are the epitome of reason and intellect. Congratulations on your mother's battle with cancer and surviving, although you've not proven causation. Many ppl battle cancer and overcome without vitamin C. Maybe she was one of them.
-
03-27-2014, 01:53 PM #43Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
The wife and I eat 95% organic. We cook almost everything we eat, with the exception of eating out once a month or so.
It can be more expensive than non organic, but really not that much. Grass fed beef is definitley more expensive, but well worth it.
Its the pesticides that are our biggest concern.
I have read that the biggest fear of the medical community is that we are becoming resistant to antibiotics. Here is why:
When a company like Monsanto, or Dow chemical GMO's a seed, they splice antibiotic tracers into the dna, so they can determin if it is their seed or not. These trace antibiotics in the food, are basically exposing us to antibiotics, therefore we are becoming resistant to them.
And they feed this to all of the livestock as well.
-
03-27-2014, 02:09 PM #44Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
Also factory farming animals live a horrible life. These are tortured souls, yes I believe animals have souls as well. Eating a tortured soul is not something I want to do. Karma and all that.
Also these large mono crop farms that all grow these GMO seeds could very easily get wiped out by some sort of blight or disease. This would destroy the food industry, and our way of life.
-
03-27-2014, 03:04 PM #45Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 2,220
Antibiotics also become less effective bc of their widespread use. Just like anything else bacteria can and will adapt. Think of vaccination. You purposely inject a modified form of what you're trying to vaccinate against in the hopes that your body will adapt and learn how to fight it in the future. Same goes for bacteria and antibiotics. Continue to treat everything with antibiotics and the bacteria will learn how to fight them off for the future.
-
03-27-2014, 03:12 PM #46Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- ky
- Posts
- 532
-
03-27-2014, 03:19 PM #47Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 2,220
-
-
03-27-2014, 03:48 PM #49Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 2,220
-
-
03-27-2014, 04:44 PM #51Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
If the crops fail, it will be too late to start over with non gmo crops. Most of livestock will die without the gmo corn feed that the farmers rely on. As well as, 90% of food in the stores are made from corn products.
Not to mention that Monsanto gmo seeds are called terminator seeds, because you cannot harvest seeds to regrow, you have to buy more seeds.
GMO crops are failing all over the world.
-
03-28-2014, 11:22 AM #52Junior Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2013
- Posts
- 96
I can get you one which shows that organic food doesn't reduce cancer.
research paper published yesterday, it's all over the news
http://www.nature.com/bjc/journal/va...c2014148a.html
Conclusions:
In this large prospective study there was little or no decrease in the incidence of cancer associated with consumption of organic food, except possibly for non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
-
03-28-2014, 11:40 AM #53Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- ky
- Posts
- 532
to be completely honest, I don't have the time or the desire to find it on the internet and paste it here. I really could care less if you believe what I say or not. I haven't been on this site in over a year since I finished my last cycle and the only reason I'm on here now is for my peptide log and a little research. This board is not my life man, as you can see I have been a member twice as long as you have and have only 1/4 of your post count. Keep on truckin man, somebody will believe you if you post it enough times.
-
03-28-2014, 11:51 AM #54Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- ky
- Posts
- 532
There is this thing called history ya know. There must be some other reason why as little as 100 yrs ago cancer was almost non existent in smaller communities( and no I'm not going to spend my time finding the statistics). Look at the ingredients of the pesticides and herbicides and then see how many of them are carcinogenic, this is simple science. It's not rocket science fellas, but keep on putting up every study, most of them biased at that, that you can find to prove it to yourselves that organic is not BEST option. It just not ****ing natural, why can't you guys understand that.
-
03-28-2014, 11:55 AM #55Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- ky
- Posts
- 532
-
03-28-2014, 12:56 PM #56Originally Posted by greenwell001
-
03-28-2014, 12:58 PM #57Banned
- Join Date
- Jun 2013
- Posts
- 2,220
It wouldn't have anything to do with the population more than tripling in the last 100yrs or so would it? Na, probably not.
Your clothes aren't natural, your car isn't natural, your toothpaste isn't natural, the toilet paper you wipe your ass with isn't natural. Natural or not, there's more at play than you care to believe unless you want to start claiming Charmin is giving you cancer too....
-
03-28-2014, 05:16 PM #58Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- ky
- Posts
- 532
-
03-28-2014, 05:17 PM #59Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- ky
- Posts
- 532
-
03-28-2014, 05:27 PM #60Senior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Location
- The Beach
- Posts
- 1,524
Actually, in a lot of toilet paper there are many harmful chemicals. Your asshole is a sensitive area, that can absorb a lot of stuff directly into your bloodstream. I would pay attention what you wipe with if I were you. Cancer of the ass does not sound like fun.
And yes you are correct, most of the things we use or touch on a daily basis are harmful and cancer causing. They use very harmful chemicals in Toothpaste, clothes, cars.
Petroleum is in almost everything. Arsenic, formeldyhyde.
They are going to make sure that everybody gets exposed to some degree or another. But the food is by far the best way to make everyone fat, sick, and weak. Profits.Profits. Healthy people are no good for business. And if you dont believe that the corporations are purposely making people sick for financial gain, then you must wake the fvck up.
-
-
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Dutasteride dosage while on and...
Today, 06:43 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS