Results 1 to 15 of 15
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By kelkel

Thread: Testosterone and Reduced Mortality

  1. #1
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,121

  2. #2
    Java Man's Avatar
    Java Man is offline Known Troll
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Location
    The Matrix
    Posts
    4,327
    Interesting. This is very recent, too.

  3. #3
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,121
    Another shameless bump.
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

  4. #4
    LowT Mike is offline HRT Specialist, P.A. - LowTestosterone.com
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Posts
    2,305
    Hey!! Good Bump though.

  5. #5
    ctenosaura's Avatar
    ctenosaura is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    310
    Okay I guess I'm going to look stupid because I don't fully understand the definition of a few key words, but in a nut shell, is the article saying men with higher T die sooner or later? And what is ischemic? Thanks for your patients with me

  6. #6
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,121
    Ischemic refers to blood flow issues.
    We all die!
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

  7. #7
    ctenosaura's Avatar
    ctenosaura is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    310
    Quote Originally Posted by kelkel View Post
    Ischemic refers to blood flow issues.
    We all die!
    Lol! This is true. So does the article say those men on T were living longer? It seemed like the test group of men were older like in their mid 70s and 80s.

  8. #8
    dreadnok89 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    978
    Dht is king

  9. #9
    phaedo's Avatar
    phaedo is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Posts
    190
    Good post kelkel!

    ...Optimal androgen levels are a biomarker for survival because older men with midrange levels of T and DHT had the lowest death rates from any cause...
    Yet more good evidence to explain why raising serum testosterone levels into the supraphysiological range should be avoided.

  10. #10
    ctenosaura's Avatar
    ctenosaura is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    310
    So would you say if the so called normal range according to Labcor is 348 – 1197, and you are always in the 1000 to 1100 range, would you consider your levels supraphysiological? Or should one drop dosage for lower levels? Kel? Low T?

  11. #11
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,121
    Quote Originally Posted by dreadnok89 View Post
    Dht is king
    To a point, yes.
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

  12. #12
    dreadnok89 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    978
    Quote Originally Posted by ctenosaura View Post
    So would you say if the so called normal range according t?o Labcor is 348 – 1197, and you are always in the 1000 to 1100 range, would you consider your levels supraphysiological? Or should one drop dosage for lower levels? Kel? Low T?
    Ranges are for insurance reasons . Find a number that's good for you!

  13. #13
    ctenosaura's Avatar
    ctenosaura is offline Associate Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    310
    Well, I feel great, strong, and virile, at 1000 T (estradiol good at this range too)......but now not sure now if this is safe for the long term

  14. #14
    dreadnok89 is offline Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    978
    Quote Originally Posted by ctenosaura View Post
    Well, I feel great, strong, and virile, at 1000 T (estradiol good at this range too)......but now not sure now if this is safe for the long term
    Even if you used that scale they have your normal range.

  15. #15
    kelkel's Avatar
    kelkel is offline HRT Specialist ~ AR-Platinum Elite-Hall of Famer ~ No Source Checks
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    East Coast Dungeon
    Posts
    30,121
    Quote Originally Posted by ctenosaura View Post
    So would you say if the so called normal range according to Labcor is 348 – 1197, and you are always in the 1000 to 1100 range, would you consider your levels supraphysiological? Or should one drop dosage for lower levels? Kel? Low T?
    If the rest of your BW is consistently good, you feel good and you're not always taking remedial action then your GTG imho.
    -*- NO SOURCE CHECKS -*-

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •