-
11-08-2020, 01:11 AM #1New Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2020
- Posts
- 12
High quality UGL for subcutaneous TRT
Hey all,
Quick question for all you TRT people would love your opinions.
Anyone here do subcutaneous injections using UGL?
Do you guys prefer intramuscular or Sub TRT?
I have access to some High quality test! And I stated in a previous post I have to go on HRT... I think if I’m going on TRT for rest of my life that Subcutaneous injects sound much easier! What’s your inputs and experience would love to hear! Cheers lads!
-
11-08-2020, 03:54 AM #2Associate Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2013
- Posts
- 227
-
11-08-2020, 04:24 PM #3New Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2020
- Posts
- 12
Thanks do input man... reason I ask was because some people say not to use ugl for sub, but want to know if people have success doing it
-
11-12-2020, 02:06 PM #4New Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2020
- Posts
- 20
I tried it once and had a big hard spot on my stomach for a couple months.
-
11-13-2020, 11:28 AM #5
I get a topical Test gel from my PCP but I supplement that with a ridiculously small dose of UGL gear, 1.25mg twice week. I have administered it Sub-Q since I began pinning, so I can't compare to IM. I'm not into dropping serious iron like many on this forum are, so my 'testing' of my TRT regimen isn't as rigorous as theirs.
That said, the topical gel is 40.5mg of Test C per sachet and I smear on one per day. Comes to 283.5mg per week. Compared to 2.5 mg per week pinned Sub-Q. On the gel alone my Total T runs low 300s. With the Sub-Q, it runs closer to 1000. The difference is YUGE considering the tiny Sub-Q dose, so I know it's effective.
The reason I dose 1.25mg is that that's 0.05ccs. I've experimented with the dosage and found that that amount is where I get the first clear "setp-up" in resistance training strength and endurance. I don't get that same boost if I only dose 0.03ccs, so there's something in my system that really likes that extra 0.02ccs, and my total Test dosing is still so low that I don't need an AI (aromatase inhibitor) and I'm not spending very much on UGL gear.
I use 27-gauge needles so drawing and administering is pretty slow, even for such a small amount. The administration itself is painless (or nearly so) unless I hit a bit of scar tissue or a blood vessel. And I always get a small lump, even from pinning such a small volume, but it always disappears in a day or two. And it stands to reason that people taking heavier doses are getting bigger lumps.
-
11-13-2020, 12:40 PM #6
Not a fan of SQ personally, but many are. As long as it works, so be it.
If I'm only running a TRT dose then similar to Beetle I'll use a 27ga x .5" syringe and inject anywhere. Simple and painless. Doesn't matter if the injection ends up being part IM and part SQ. It all works.
-
11-13-2020, 12:42 PM #7
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
First Test-E cycle in 10 years
11-11-2024, 03:22 PM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS