-
11-02-2005, 11:55 PM #1
How long on GH b4 I start seeing any results?
I mean anything. I know most guys say that fat loss startes to come before actual growing does, but how long are we talking before it gets noticeable? I plan on running it 6 months at 3-4 iu/day
-
11-03-2005, 01:25 AM #2
3-4 is a little on the low side. I have known people to not really notice gains for quite awhile. Maybe introduce some slin with it for better gains.
-
11-03-2005, 08:30 AM #3
depends.. on how old you are (older people (35+) get better and faster results.. 3-4 is low, but is what is recommended for a 1st cycle..
6 months. 5 on 2 off.. but that is more because of $$$.. run it 6/1 instead..
takes 2 months before you really notice anything.. and 4 before you think you have discovered the fountain of youth.. (if older)..
that's my experience anyway..The answer to your every question
Rules
A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted
to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially
one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.
If you get scammed by an UGL listed on this board or by another member here, it's all part of the game and learning experience for you,
we do not approve nor support any sources that may be listed on this site.
I will not do source checks for you, the peer review from other members should be enough to help you make a decision on your quest. Buyer beware.
Don't Let the Police kick your ass
-
11-03-2005, 09:15 AM #4
I agree with the above comments that 3-4 iu's is low dose.To be rather honest you don't see any HGH related growth til you hit the 6+ iu mark.And that's with anabolics included in the cycle.If you're just running HGH by itself you'll see no muscle gain at all running a dose under 8 iu's ED(That's everyday,7 days straight).
~Pinnacle~
-
11-03-2005, 10:37 AM #5Originally Posted by Pinnacle
For the reasons mentioned, I would use LR3 if I were going to use over 4iu of HGH. The cost to result ratio is better then HGH, I'm not much of an HGH fan. I've used it 3 times and seen better results using LR3 and it didn't cost as much.
JohnnyB
-
11-03-2005, 12:52 PM #6
I agree with Johnny here. My run with IGF was much more anabolic than my current run with HGH. I gained some mass DURING pct! I'm 39, so I'm using low dose HGH (2iu/day) for overall health and re-juve. Still yet to feel like it's the fountain of youth but looking forward to getting shredded in 6 mo! Just starting to notice speedier hair growth, nail growth, and the 5-6 gray hairs that have made my temples their home are now gone.
-
11-03-2005, 05:29 PM #7Originally Posted by Pinnacle
-
11-04-2005, 10:53 AM #8Originally Posted by stayinstacked
~Pinnacle~
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Gearheaded
12-30-2024, 06:57 AM in ANABOLIC STEROIDS - QUESTIONS & ANSWERS